Appointment of former mayor to Dunedin finance board draws protest
DUNEDIN -- Everyone agrees that former Dunedin Mayor, Commissioner and state Rep. Tom Anderson (photo at right) will do a great job in his role as the newest member of Dunedin's Board of Finance.
But not everyone - including two residents who have resigned their positions on four other citizen advisory boards - approves of how he got there.
Controversy has erupted since last week's 3-2 vote by the Dunedin City Commission to appoint Anderson to the finance board, a group of 13 volunteers that advises the commission and city manager on budget proposals and other financial matters.
Under the normal appointment process for a city advisory board, the members review applications from individuals who want to fill board vacancies, then recommend their top pick to the City Commission. Commissioners make the appointment.
But last week, Commissioner David Carson made a motion to immediately appoint Anderson to one of two finance board vacancies, circumventing the board's desire to vet eight potential applicants itself.
"Going through these years of turmoil with the budget, I think his experience and knowledge would be a huge asset to this city," Carson said. "There are two seats open on that board. To appoint one at this time I don't think is that big of a deal."
Vice Mayor Ron Barnette and Commissioner Julie Scales voted no. Both agreed that Anderson would make a "terrific" addition to the board. However, they declined to set a precedent and disregard members' wishes when, they said, Anderson could still attend meetings and participate.
"This is a big deal, really, because we have established processes that ensure all people are fairly considered and that the group that they'll be working with has reviewed and had their input," Scales said. "We should respect that process, otherwise we go down that slippery slope" of doing away with standard guidelines.
In a June 14 letter to the commission, board chairman John Tornga said the group hadn't been able to consider replacements because of the increased workload while reviewing Dunedin's proposed 2013 budget and the difficulty in coordinating the 11 existing board members' schedules.
"It was also felt that we could complete our tasks with the current members," he wrote.
He asked that members be allowed to follow their normal selection process after they submitted their budget report around June 21 - the date the commission appointed Anderson.
Anderson - who has master's degrees in business and finance, worked for years as a management consultant, and is already active on the city's aging committee - will finish a three-year term that expires in October.
In an interview Wednesday with the Tampa Bay Times, Anderson said he didn't realize there were other candidates and was surprised when Carson intervened on his behalf. Backlash over the commission's decision surprised him even more.
"One of the comments made was that they didn't want to change the process. But every rule that's made, there are exceptions made to it. And the city commission votes on making exceptions all the time," he said. He referenced this month's debate over whether commissioners should invoke a new procedure that allows elected leaders to take decision-making authority about certain home construction projects away from city staff.
He believes he likely would have been selected for the finance board position under the normal process anyway: "Why would you want to wait four months if you're going to have the same decision?"
That explanation doesn't placate David Pauley, a longtime member of Dunedin's Code Enforcement Board and Local Planning Agency, and Norma Tillges, who served nine years on the Marina Advisory Committee, spent more than six years on the Community Redevelopment Agency Advisory Committee, and even worked on Anderson's Tallahassee campaign.
Both resigned their board positions last week. They said they respect Anderson, admire his contributions to the community and agree that he is qualified and likely will make a good finance board member.
"But the process didn't happen. That's my problem," Pauley said.
"This has happened in the past, where they've gone over the boards' recommendations, and I think it's complete disrespect for the chairpeople, for the committees, and for the applicants that are on file for any committee," he said. "How would you feel if you're someone who sat there for two years to be considered and your name isn't even brought up at the meeting?"
--Keyonna Summers, Times Staff Writer