|
What's the plan at receiver?
We dropped a lot of names around here yesterday as the Bucs blanketed the league with phone calls to prospective signees.
But you may have noticed that very few of those players were receivers. And you're probably wondering why in the world that is.
So were we. Here's what we've gleaned from various conversations:
It's clear the Bucs aren't that thrilled with the crop of free-agent receivers. We have yet to hear them connected to Bernard Berrian, who was considered the prize entering the weekend (assuming Randy Moss isn't up for grabs). No one has told us anything that indicates they're in the race for Donte' Stallworth, either. Regarding Seattle's D.J. Hackett, word is the Bucs don't think he's all that different from Michael Clayton and Maurice Stovall. So, why pay ridiculously to get him? They also had no intention of chasing Jerry Porter, who got a surprising $30-million deal from Jacksonville.
We expect they'll make a run at Devery Henderson, who visited Friday, or some other middle-of-the-pack free agent receiver. But it's becoming clear the Bucs think they can find a difference-maker in the draft. They might just be right. The selection in the draft is much deeper than what's on the free-agent market. And with Tampa Bay picking 20th overall, the Bucs are confident one of the better receivers will fall to them.
It's an interesting approach they're taking at a position that needs addressing. We'll see soon enough how it all plays out and -- more important -- whether it worked.
Most Recent Blog Posts
About the blog
Tampa Bay Buccaneers fans: Keep up with your team news on Bucs Beat, our blog for all things Bucs. Tampa Bay Times sports writers keep you posted on the latest Bucs news, and you can weigh in with your own thoughts.
Advertisement
Most Popular Categories
Follow us on Facebook
Comment Policy
| Please be sure your comments are appropriate before submitting them. Inappropriate comments include content that: |
| Is libelous |
| Is abusive, harassing, or threatening |
| Is obscene, vulgar, or profane |
| Is racially, ethnically or religiously offensive |
| Is illegal or encourages criminal acts |
| Is known to be inaccurate or contains a false attribution |
| Infringes copyrights, trademarks, publicity or any other rights of others |
| Impersonates anyone (actual or fictitious) |
| Solicits funds, goods or services, or advertises |
| The Tampa Bay Times does not edit posts but reserves the right to delete comments that violate our policy. |
Registration FAQ
| Read our Frequently Asked Questions on how to register to comment on the site. |