Senator speaks of back room dealing in Florida testing legislation
When Republican and Democratic senators a week ago were grappling with how to reach middle ground on proposed testing reforms for K-12 public schools, they hashed out their differences, quite literally, in a backroom meeting out of the public's eye.
Senate Democratic Leader Oscar Braynon, of Miami Gardens, revealed the existence of the meeting while speaking with his caucus at a public breakfast Monday, the final day of the 2017 session.
Confined in that small space, no member of the public could have observed or overheard what the three Republicans and three Democrats discussed, even though the chamber was in open session just outside. The conversations and negotiating that took place in that room helped yield a 72-page rewrite to a House education bill (HB 549), which senators later approved unanimously on Thursday.
While discussing a 278-page K-12 budget bill (HB 7069) House Republicans had produced late Friday -- which incorporated most of, but not all, of the testing bill the Senate passed and myriad other policies -- Braynon complained that input provided by Democrats wasn't reflected in the final product.
"A lot of those things got combined into one education bill, and many things got left off -- and they got left off because people like Senator [Darryl] Rouson, Senator [Bill] Montford, Senator [Gary] Farmer were in a room negotiating with Senator [David] Simmons, Senator [Kelli] Stargel, Senator [Anitere] Flores to make sure that we produced a product that we, as an entire Senate, agreed what was to happen in Florida. Not just what one side wants," Braynon said.
Rouson of St. Petersburg, Montford of Tallahassee and Farmer of Lighthouse Point are Democrats. Simmons of Altamonte Springs, Stargel of Lakeland and Flores of Miami are Republicans.
Farmer told the Herald/Times after Monday's Democratic caucus that the meeting Braynon spoke of had taken place in a Senate floor conference room -- known as "the bubble" -- during a daily floor session last week. (The testing bill was supposed to be taken up Wednesday but was delayed amid vehement concerns by Montford and others. The rewrite was filed under Flores' and Stargel's names later that night.)
The Constitution allows only two lawmakers to meet privately if they're deciding on "formal legislative action" or "pending legislation or amendments." But any "prearranged" meetings of more than two lawmakers discussing such topics have to be noticed in advance and open to the public.
The senators' gathering in "the bubble" presents a grey area to those Sunshine requirements.
"This is the problem [with] the constitutional provision ... and the ease by which the right of access can be negated - it applies only to 'pre-arranged' gatherings," First Amendment Foundation President Barbara Petersen said by email.
She questioned why a group of senators would be negotiating "these important and substantive issues" in a room like "the bubble."
"The public should know that major policy decisions are being made [without] any public oversight or input," she said.
At the caucus breakfast Monday, Braynon vented frustration that Democratic senators had "negotiated in good faith" with the Republican senators -- only for their combined work to be disregarded and distorted through House Republicans' unexpected compilation of various policies in HB 7069.
Simmons, the Republican chairman of the Senate's pre-K-12 budget committee, said on the floor Monday he wasn't given a draft until Thursday evening -- less than 24 hours before the rewrite of HB 7069 was made public. Lawmakers narrowly passed the bill before ending their annual session on Monday, although some expect -- and want --- Republican Gov. Rick Scott to issue a veto.
"We accepted something that probably we may not have accepted were it not for: It was a negotiation and it was a negotiation in good faith," Braynon said during Monday's breakfast.
"To turn around and have [HB 7069] come up on the floor that has many of the things that were negotiated out, many of the things that were not talked about, put back in -- not only that, a bill that was killed in Rules ... I believe that just the concept of us doing this conforming bill, like this, is contrary to what we, as a Senate, are supposed to be," he said.