|
The Cackle, Hillary's Cleavage and Giuliani's Cellphone: Why Is This the Talk of the Presidential Campaign?
I was listening to a weekend edition of National Public Radio's interesting youth-oriented morning show,
the Bryant Park Project -- thank you satellite radio! -- when a panel discussion's talk turned to The Cackle.
If you haven't seen the New York Times story, The Cackle is the term reporter Patrick Healy uses to describe Clinton's hearty laughter during interviews and debates. Healy's piece implies the laugh is a calculated move, avoiding charges of sexism by claiming the term was coined by her friends. And the Project chewed over the issue a bit.
I was sitting in my car wondering: Is this what dialog about the presidential election has come to?
Ditto with stories about Rudy Giuliani taking cell phone calls from his wife during speeches. And the infamous Washington Post story dissecting Hillary's cleavage.
Two years into a presidential campaign, with all the expected front runners leading the pack three months before a real vote is cast, this is to be expected, I guess. Reporters who have been covering this crew intensely for so long are likely running out of new stories to file. So who can blame journalists for turning to cackle and cleavage?
Also, Hillary's laugh is an interesting strategy, but not for the reasons I've seen pundits outline. For decades, Republicans and right wing pundits have won political conflicts by mastering The Code -- a way of speaking to their supporters in a way that communicates their message without making definitive statements an opponent can use against you.
Bush references The Bible and evangelical culture. Bill O'Reilly makes hateful references to rap culture. Lou Dobbs talks about illegal alien criminals. And Hillary has her laugh.
Deployed in response to a question about partisanship from Fox News, the laugh was Hillary's way of saying to supporters Can you believe this? The most partisan TV news network in American is asking me about being too partisan? All communicated without saying a single thing host Chris Wallace could challenge.
Sure, it humanizes Clinton a bit. But the laugh -- I agree with the Huffington Post's Rachel Sklar and others that the term cackle seems a bit pejorative and female-specific -- also allows Hillary to speak volumes without saying a word.
And considering all the minute ways we're dissecting modern candidates these days, that's a serious advantage.
Most Recent Blog Posts
About the bloggers
The best TV shows, the worst shows, TV news, media issues and debates ... it's all here at the Feed, a blog on TV, media and modern life by Tampa Bay Times TV/media critic Eric Deggans. Possibly the most critical guy at the Times, he has served as music, media and TV critic at various times over 10 years.
E-mail Eric Deggans:
deggans@tampabay.com
Get updates from The Feed via Twitter
Twitter Badges
Advertisement
Most Popular Categories
Follow us on Facebook
Comment Policy
| Please be sure your comments are appropriate before submitting them. Inappropriate comments include content that: |
| Is libelous |
| Is abusive, harassing, or threatening |
| Is obscene, vulgar, or profane |
| Is racially, ethnically or religiously offensive |
| Is illegal or encourages criminal acts |
| Is known to be inaccurate or contains a false attribution |
| Infringes copyrights, trademarks, publicity or any other rights of others |
| Impersonates anyone (actual or fictitious) |
| Solicits funds, goods or services, or advertises |
| The Tampa Bay Times does not edit posts but reserves the right to delete comments that violate our policy. |
Registration FAQ
| Read our Frequently Asked Questions on how to register to comment on the site. |
