|
Why real journalists should be asking tough questions about Jett Travolta's death
When I first saw a news account citing Kawasaki disease as a possible cause of Jett Travolta's death,
my journalism Spidey Sense started tingling like crazy.
You see, my son suffered from Kawasaki as a toddler. It was a painful, frightening ordeal, in which he suffered a high fever and his extremities swelled and peeled off loads of skin, keeping him from sleeping, going to the restroom or even taking a bath.
But our biggest problem was that the disease was so rare, doctors didn't know what it was when they saw it. When a young physician who knew the disease diagnosed it, and my son was given transfusions of blood products to combat it, our only worry was whether the virus had affected his heart.
So why was anyone hinting that Kawasaki might have caused the seizure that killed Jett?
The St. Petersburg Times has a great story today dissecting the rumors and facts about the 16-year-old, son of John Travolta and Kelly Preston, concluding that Jett may have died of the simplest reason: a seizure that came despite any medicine he was taking or treatment provided.
The story also suggests that a breathless press, rushing to find some explanation for the teen's sudden death, took past family statements about Jett's brush with Kawasaki and asthma and blew them up into misleading conclusions.
I sympathize with folks, like my pal and Times movie critic Steve Persall, who wish the full weight of tabloid and legitimate media could lay off a bit when something this awful happens to a celebrity.
But because the Travoltas are well-known Scientologists, and their religion does not believe in treatment for psychological disorders, there were, I think, legitimate questions for journalists to ask about whether this kid of famous parents got the medical help he needed. Believe me, if the kid's name was Jett Johnson from Ocala, with parents who belonged to a controversial religion that might affect his treatment, journalists would likely be asking the same questions. There just wouldn't be as many.
But this is the problem when celebrity and real news intersects; sometimes it's hard to figure out where the real journalism imperative lies.
As I've said before, the solution isn't for the press to turn away, but for responsible journalists to practice good journalism -- and shame the bottom feeders by proving there's more to the subject than titillating speculation.
(Photos: Rogers & Cowan publicity/AP)
*
Most Recent Blog Posts
About the bloggers
The best TV shows, the worst shows, TV news, media issues and debates ... it's all here at the Feed, a blog on TV, media and modern life by Tampa Bay Times TV/media critic Eric Deggans. Possibly the most critical guy at the Times, he has served as music, media and TV critic at various times over 10 years.
E-mail Eric Deggans:
deggans@tampabay.com
Get updates from The Feed via Twitter
Twitter Badges
Advertisement
Most Popular Categories
Follow us on Facebook
Comment Policy
| Please be sure your comments are appropriate before submitting them. Inappropriate comments include content that: |
| Is libelous |
| Is abusive, harassing, or threatening |
| Is obscene, vulgar, or profane |
| Is racially, ethnically or religiously offensive |
| Is illegal or encourages criminal acts |
| Is known to be inaccurate or contains a false attribution |
| Infringes copyrights, trademarks, publicity or any other rights of others |
| Impersonates anyone (actual or fictitious) |
| Solicits funds, goods or services, or advertises |
| The Tampa Bay Times does not edit posts but reserves the right to delete comments that violate our policy. |
Registration FAQ
| Read our Frequently Asked Questions on how to register to comment on the site. |
