Nielsen ratings delays prove the danger of monopolizing TV ratings
But a key bit of information used to make those calls — how many people watched those shows’ last episodes — has not been available this week from the only company that provides viewership ratings data to the TV industry: Nielsen Media Research.
Citing “server issues,” Nielsen delayed the release of overnight ratings information — providing data from Sunday night’s broadcasts late Wednesday and promising to issue statistics from Monday and Tuesday sometime today.
The result, is that the very currency of the TV industry has been switched off for long days, just when many clients need it the most.
Given that there is no other company that provides overnight, comprehensive TV ratings to the industry, companies which pay millions each year for Nielsen's services are wondering why the media giant didn't at least have a backup system ready to deal with such issues.
The problems raised new questions about Nielsen's outsourcing of work at its Oldsmar facility -- did it hamper the company's ability to recover from the breakdown? And as even some of Nielsen's public relations people struggled to understand details of what went wrong, the company sent clients memos filled with technical jargon on how the problem emerged and efforts underway to repair it.
“This is a tough time, we know,” said Nielsen spokeswoman Karen Gyimesi, who said the problem likely occurred at the company’s sprawling data collection center in Oldsmar. “We’re working around the clock to try and catch up.”
According to memos sent to Nielsen customers, the company had a software problem inside servers that collect viewership information from TV sets across the country through telephone lines.
Though the problem mostly affected data from Saturday and Sunday night, because the company releases data chronologically, it couldn’t provide ratings for the rest of this week until the weekend problems were resolved.
The problems also affected markets where local TV stations get detailed overnight ratings on who watched shows, including the Tampa Bay area. And the problems surfaced at the start of the May “sweeps” ratings period, where viewership is used to set advertising rates at many local stations for several months.
“It’s mostly an annoyance right now,” said Jennifer Yarter, a ratings analyst for WFLA-Ch. 8. “This is the first time I can remember Nielsen has been dark this long for something that is their fault.”
Last month, Nielsen was sued by the owner of Miami Fox affiliate WSVN, which claimed “wildly inaccurate” ratings cut the station’s viewership by 40 percent and cost $100-million.
Other industry experts have expressed unease over Nielsen’s dominance of the TV ratings business, noting that the company told TV networks recently it may be undercounting those who watch television inside its sample households by up to 8 percent.
“The whole industry eats, sleeps and breathes these numbers . . . Why didn’t they have a backup system?” said Shari Anne Brill, a ratings analyst at New York ad-buyer Carat USA. “As they used to say on I Love Lucy, I think they’ve got some ‘splainin’ to do.”