Video Games

Monday, February 27, 2006

Sony's Blu-Ray problem

The New York Times has an important article up about the looming next-gen DVD format war. After reading this, things really aren't looking good for Sony and its Blu-Ray allies.

The gist of the story is that as cost and production problems have cropped up for Blu-Ray, industry giants have gone from staying neutral to exclusively backing HD-DVD (Microsoft and Intel) or from only supporting Blu-Ray to backing both formats (Hewlett-Packard and LG Electronics). The quotes tell the tale:

"The pendulum is swinging back to the HD-DVD camp," said John Freeman, who runs a technology research firm, Strategic Marketing Decisions, which last year declared Blu-ray the front-runner. "It will be interesting to see if the Blu-ray group can recover. It's only a matter of time before people start backing out of the Blu-ray camp."
...
"It's too early to move into this market," said Katsuhiko Machida, the president of Sharp, a Blu-ray company that has not released details for its players in the United States. "Blu-Ray won't be a big business until probably 2008," he said, so "we can watch and see what happens."
...
Most important/worrisome: "It was very, very clear that Sony was not going to back down from Blu-ray, and they are basically betting their company on it," said Kevin Tsujihara, the president of Warner Brothers Home Entertainment Group.
All of the PlayStation 3's delays, problems and unknowns can be traced to Blu-Ray. No Blu-Ray, no extra $300 drive whose technology isn't quite ready -- and thus no high price tag or huge loss taken on each unit sold. Without Blu-Ray to worry about, Sony likely could have overcome the troubles with mass producing a complicated new graphics chip/processor, since that happens with every new console. Without the uncertainty of Blu-Ray, all the other details could have fallen into place long ago -- and we would have seen working demos by now, and actual mockups of the console.

I'm worried -- and all gaming fans should be -- that Sony has chosen the PS3 to make its last great proprietary stand. Sony had to back down on its original DVD format and join a rival group. The 90s explosion of cheap, high-quality electronics from elsewhere in Asia made Sony's brand-name edge moot. The company missed out on a whole new generation of consumer electronics when Apple succeeded with the iPod and iTunes. The flat-panel TV boom has made Sharp and Samsung as prominent as Sony. The PSP's proprietary UMD format is fizzling.

Sony is apparently hoping that its huge PS2 installed base and the PS3's hype will give it a built in, insurmountable head start in the DVD war -- and will deliver the kind of proprietary victory that has eluded the company for a couple of decades. Which is a fine plan, in theory -- if it made logistical and financial sense. With each passing week and each new article, that seems not to be the case. And as the Times story shows, the rest of the consumer electronics/entertainment world recognizes this.

In a typically astute New Yorker column about Sony's proprietary vanity, James Surowiecki wrote: "Ultimately, Sony doesn’t have much choice: it will either change or continue to come up short." The Blu-Ray bet shows Sony is not yet ready to change. This might be the final time the company has a choice in the matter.

1 Comments:

  • At 16:32, audioeric said…

    Good article. I think the thing to remember here is that Sony has never had a proprietary medium 'make it'. Look at Beta, MiniDisc, MemorySticks, UMD's, MMCD (rival to DVD), ATRAC (their rival to MP3 and AAC)... It's not that those mediums weren't good. I'd say that they were mostly all better than their rivals. MiniDiscs were better than CD's, in that they were in a case, and were smaller.. Beta looked better than VHS..

    Why has Sony failed everytime? BluRay has better specs than HD-DVD on paper, but judging by history, that dooms to format even more.

    Then along comes the PS3, who everyone has speculated will come with a BluRay player and be < $500... Now, Samsung is supposed to be launching their BR player not much sooner than the PS3 is supposed to come up, and it will retail for about $1000. Now, if the PS3 were going to come with a BR player, wouldn't it have to be more expensive than the stand alone players? Why would Samsung try to sell a Standalone player for more than a PS3, it just wouldn't happen at all.

    Look at the history of the PS2. It had DVD capabilities, but it was also more expensive than DVD players when it came out.

    I think people need to realize that PS3 to BluRay isn't the same as PS2 to DVD, but rather PS1 to DVD. When PS1 was debuting, DVD was just about to launch. It would have been huge for Sony to throw their MMCD into that, but it would never have worked because of cost.

    Sony has always been so good at overhyping all of their entertainment products (Emotion Engine anyone?), but the hype behind the PS3 has just been ridiculous. 120FPS, 1080p on Dual monitors.. Most people see that and go WOW!! However, there is no qualification of what that actually pertains to. How many polygons is that rendering, what kind of AI is that, what kind of physics engine, etc.. From the previews that have been posted online in various places, the games are all running rather well at 720p, and then can be upconverted to 1080p. Which is much like the 360 upconverting to just another resolution, or using an upconverting DVD player..

    Back to the BluRay, I really just don't see it winning at all, but I do agree with other industry folk when they say that this may very well be the last of the format wars. How much easier would everything be if movies were available on any media, and upgrading to a new standard was nothing more than a BIOSFlash upgrade. How long until we have our own portable hard drive that will contain all of our documents, songs, movies, etc.. My 60GB iPod comes close to this, but it would be cool to see this with better compression(such as Divx), HD capable output, and longer battery life...

    eric

     

Post a Comment

<< Home