Today's paper | eEdition | Subscribe
The Truth-O-Meter
Latest print edition
St. Petersburg Times
Consumer
Special report
Video report
Multimedia report
  • Owning vs. renting
    The end of the real estate boom has led to a community mix that some owner-occupants say they didn't bargain for. See detailed, clickable maps with data for your neighborhood.
  • More multimedia reports
Fill out this form to email this article to a friend
Your name Your email
Recipient email
You may enter up to 20 multiple email addresses, separated by commas.
Your message
Nominated corporations

Column: Vote for the corporate abuser that's the worst

By Ivan Penn, Times Staff Writer
In print: Sunday, March 23, 2008


Social Bookmarking [+]
Digg Facebook Stumbleupon
Reddit Del.icio.us Newsvine
ADVERTISEMENT

Who says there's no justice for consumers?

Opportunity has come again for consumers to vote their displeasure with corporate abuse.

The polls opened last week for the crowning of the worst corporations of the year, a

14-year-old project of Corporate Accountability International.

It's sort of like the Razzies (you know, the worst actor, worst picture Hollywood awards) for corporations that behaved badly over the past year.

Of course, the Consumer's Edge refers to them as members of the Greedy Family.

There are eight nominees this year for the so-called Corporate Hall of Shame. The idea is by calling them out, consumers might persuade them to get their acts together. (You know, like when the teacher yells Johnny's name in front of the whole class and he gets embarrassed).

Well, one of the nominees is Nestle, for, among other things, "threatening community water supplies with its bottled water brands."

Sara Joseph, a spokeswoman for Corporate Accountability International, contacted me about Nestle's nomination after reading my reports on drinking water on March 14 and 15. (Find it at

www.tampabay.com/news/)

In the reports, I pointed out that the state allows Nestle to draw up to 588-million gallons a year for free from a state park in northern Florida. In addition, Nestle uses the same water at the same plant to bottle some of its different brands and then sells them at different prices at the grocer.

This highlighted to Joseph the reason why her operation had nominated Nestle as a potential inductee to the Hall of Shame.

The others rounding out the eight nominees are Mattel, Countrywide, Wal-Mart (which is up for induction into the Hall of Shame for its second year in a row), Toyota, Wendy's, Blackwater Worldwide and Archer Daniels Midland.

Consumers can cast their vote through July 4. The three companies with the most votes will be inducted this year.

"Make no mistake, we believe all of the nominees deserve this infamous dishonor, but we look forward to seeing which corporations the voting public selects as the worst of the worst," Kelle Louaillier, executive director of Corporate Accountability Interntional, said in a statement.

Last year's inductees were Wal-Mart, ExxonMobil and Halliburton. The illustrious club includes Philip Morris/Altria, Columbia/HCA and waste disposal giant Waste Management.

Don't think it doesn't matter. Thomas Frist, CEO of Columbia/HCA, didn't take kindly to his company's induction: "I can't tell you how much that hurts — the Hall of Shame," he told the Wall Street Journal after his company's 2000 induction.

Here's your opportunity to voice your displeasure with some corporate actions. Visit

www.stopcorporateabuse.org to cast your ballot.

Ivan Penn can be reached at ipenn@sptimes.com or (727) 892-2332.


NestlE, for labor violations, including child exploitation, and threatening community water supplies when siting water bottling plants. • Archer Daniels Midland for contributing to global warming by clearing endangered forests to develop palm oil plantations • Blackwater

Worldwide, for killing unarmed Iraqi civilians, and using its ties to the Bush administration to secure lucrative contracts • Countrywide, for predatory mortgage lending to elderly and non-English-speaking borrowers, and for gouging minority borrowers with discriminatory rates and fees • Mattel, for producing lead-contaminated children's toys and lobbying against bans on other toxic chemicals. • TOyota, for lobbying against measures to reduce global warming gas emissions while hypocritically spending millions to advertise its environmental "leadership" and Prius hybrids • Wal-Mart, for displacing local businesses, failing to cover employees under the corporation's health plan and opposing legislation that would increase homeland security • Wendy's, for its contribution to the growing childhood obesity and diabetes epidemics and for refusing to meet nutrition label regulations.

Source: Corporate Accountability International

. Go to www.stopcorporateabuse.org

to place your votes.


[Last modified: Mar 23, 2008 10:49 PM]



Subscribe to the Times
Click here for daily delivery
of the St. Petersburg Times.

Email Newsletters

ADVERTISEMENT

 
ADVERTISEMENT