Make us your home page

Despite difference in values, a friendship with a history is worth saving

Despite changes in social habits, long friendship is worth saving

Q: An old friend and I have changed over the past couple of years. I converted, she became a little more wild. Now, the only thing we have in common is that we are both female, and that we have been friends nearly our whole lives. I really want to be friends again, but, because we don't really share ideals anymore, it might just completely deteriorate if I try to bring our friendship back where it once was. Should I just give up the friendship, or try to re-instill it, and possibly break down whatever we have left?

Distressed in Dallas

A: Surely there's more to you both than your social habits? You read, you watch movies, you have opinions about food or sports or music?

In other words, not every detail of your humanity has been subsumed by your conversion, presumably, nor has her humanity gone entirely wild. That's where you start your effort to renew your friendship — with the understanding that neither of you is just a vessel for your differing ideals.

It may be that a shared lifestyle is all you liked about each other, and your divergent paths have taken you to the point where nothing is shared, and no amount of effort will make her company enjoyable again. It happens. But as "friends nearly our whole lives," you hold — and shaped — so much of each other's history. For that reason alone, you owe it to both of you to look for what you once valued in her. Maybe new things, too.

Love for a son should trump attraction to a married woman

Q: I am a divorced, 30-year-old father of a bright, happy 11-year-old. I have been in several long-term relationships that he has been a part of, growing to know and care for my partners.

I've been dating a married woman for six months. She had said from the beginning she's going to get a divorce. She has been staying with me the past couple of months, only stopping at her shared apartment with her husband to get clothes and things she needs. They are still talking, working out the logistics of their separation.

My concern is how I present her to my son. I have been very tentative and protective of him in the past (he doesn't meet my girlfriends until I've been with them at least six months.) However, this has been so great of a relationship he has already met her. Honestly, if she weren't married, I'd have proposed already. I believe she is the one, and she says the same about me.

Am I being foolish? I'm experienced enough to know this could be the real deal, but I still know to shade my son from the infidelity side of it. Should I keep these two separated until she's actually divorced?


A: A little late for that, no? But I'll answer you anyway: Yes, you're being foolish. And yes, keep the new woman away from your son until she's actually divorced.

Then keep her at arm's length until you're able to appreciate that chucking your old protectiveness is not the good sign you believe it to be. It doesn't say, "She's the one"; it says, "She's the one who dismantled my impulse-control system," and that's about attraction, not love. Sometimes love follows attraction, but never bet the household-with-children on it.

Despite difference in values, a friendship with a history is worth saving 01/14/12 [Last modified: Saturday, January 14, 2012 3:31am]
Photo reprints | Article reprints

Copyright: For copyright information, please check with the distributor of this item, Washington Post Writers Group.

Join the discussion: Click to view comments, add yours