Overcast60° FULL FORECASTOvercast60° FULL FORECAST
Make us your home page
Instagram

Your standards should be the basis for setting priorities

Adapted from a recent online discussion.

Setting the right priorities for your circumstances is your job

Q: My parents make a strong, overt distinction between married and nonmarried significant others, meaning the former are included in absolutely everything, appropriate or not, and the latter are routinely excluded from things that are family-only.

For instance, my sister's husband was invited to (and attended) my otherwise all-female baby shower, while my boyfriend, now the father of my child, was not invited to our annual holiday vacation. Mom's argument is that being treated like family is one of the benefits/incentives of legal marriage.

I declined to go with them, but now I'm seething at being forced to make that choice. I'm trying to see things Mom's way. What are your thoughts?

Maryland

A: Mom sounds bullheaded and arbitrary, and from an outsider's distance I dig the irony of a "pro-family" move that splinters a family. But since my opinion counts for nothing here, and since dwelling on the rightness or wrongness of Mom's policy hasn't gotten you anywhere (nor is it likely to), your better bet for pondering is your situation.

Are you doing all you can to serve your child, your sense of what's right and the health of your relationship? If not, then answer your Mom agitation by focusing on what your own family needs — not by your mom's standards, but by yours. And if you feel you are meeting those needs already, then use that as an internal rebuttal to your mother and keep reminding yourself that you've got the right priorities for your circumstances.

It sounds as if your mom believes that priorities are independent of circumstances, and that's just a different worldview from yours, one she's entitled to just as you are to yours.

There's often a reasonable account when things seem 'off'

Q: What do you have to say about two people who have a child together, but insist they are not ready to make the marriage commitment? Are these two types of commitment really so different, or is that (as I see it) just a huge load of bull?

Va.

A: I'd have to know the circumstances to call something bull, because there's often a reasonable explanation for something that appears off. (And as everyone knows who has been to a traditional, all-hoops-jumped-through wedding of two people who turned out to be terrible together, there can be a whole lot that's off about something that appears sound.)

To give an example of something I'd call reasonable, take a statistic that I dug up a while back for a column. A couple of sources put the rate of premarital sex among American adults at 85 to 95 percent. So, darn near everybody. And since birth control (and self-control) can be imperfect, sometimes unready couples conceive. And sometimes these couples decide that despite their unreadiness as a couple, they like each other enough and want children enough to want no part of abortion or placing their child for adoption. So, they step forward gingerly into the business of being a family.

That's just one example of a cart-before-horse couple who I wouldn't call a "huge load of bull" or banish from Christmas — but, then, I can only Christmas for myself.

Your standards should be the basis for setting priorities 04/23/12 [Last modified: Monday, April 23, 2012 4:59pm]
Photo reprints | Article reprints

Copyright: For copyright information, please check with the distributor of this item, Washington Post Writers Group.
    

Join the discussion: Click to view comments, add yours

Loading...