Make us your home page

Accusations against generals cast shadow over Army

Gen. William “Kip” Ward is accused of using taxpayer funds to support a high-rolling lifestyle.

Associated Press (2006)

Gen. William “Kip” Ward is accused of using taxpayer funds to support a high-rolling lifestyle.

WASHINGTON — The accusations leveled against three Army generals over the past six months are as varied as they are striking, the highest-profile of a growing number of allegations of wrongdoing by senior military officials.

A one-star general was flown home from Afghanistan last spring to face criminal charges, including sexual assault. A four-star general formerly in charge of the increasingly vital Africa command was accused of financial mismanagement, accepting inappropriate gifts and assigning staff personal tasks.

And a three-star general who oversees the U.S. Missile Defense Agency was described in an inspector general report as an abrasive and verbally abusive boss.

The investigations have become an embarrassment for the Army, raising questions about how thoroughly the military has screened senior leaders before putting them in crucial assignments.

The Defense Department's inspector general reviewed 38 cases of alleged wrongdoing by senior officials in 2011, and substantiated the accusations in nearly 40 percent of them, up from 21 percent in 2007. The total caseload this year is on track to exceed last year's.

"It's always concerning when senior leaders have issues, because we have very specific faith in senior leaders," Gen. Ray Odierno, Army chief of staff, said in a recent interview. Odierno said all such cases are taken seriously, but argued that "we can't allow a few to detract from the honorable service of many."

The investigation into Gen. William "Kip" Ward, the former chief of Africa Command, is being closely watched at the Pentagon, where rank-and-file officers wonder aloud whether senior leaders will be reticent to punish one of their own.

A June 26 report, compiled after investigators pored through a trove of emails and expense reports, portrays a general using taxpayer funds to support a high-rolling lifestyle. The inspector general concluded that Ward used government funds to pay for personal travel expenses; assigned staff to run errands for him and his wife; and accepted meals and Broadway tickets from a defense contractor, in violation of Pentagon rules. The inspector general's report says he wasted and misused tens of thousands of taxpayer dollars.

Ward rejected several of the accusations of wrongdoing in a written response to the inspector general's findings, arguing, for instance, that many of the expenses in question were legitimate. He declined a request for comment.

The inspector general's conclusions on Ward were released two months before the agency issued a report documenting allegations that Lt. Gen. Patrick O'Reilly created a toxic atmosphere at the Missile Defense Agency by berating staff members. Quoting a witness, the inspector general's report described his style as "management by blowtorch and pliers."

The report says that the general maintains that he "never insulted or verbally abused anyone."

O'Reilly remains in charge of the agency, although the Senate is set to vote on a nominee to be his successor. He also did not respond to a request for comment.

The case that came to light most recently involved the criminal investigation against Brig. Gen. Jeffrey Sinclair, who was removed from his job as the deputy commander of the 82nd Airborne Division in May and flown home from Afghanistan. Although the military has released few details about the investigation, officials at Fort Bragg, N.C., where the 82nd is based, released a summary of the criminal charges filed against him last month. They include forcible sodomy, wrongful sexual conduct, engaging in inappropriate relationships, misusing a government charge card and possessing alcohol and pornography while deployed.

Sinclair will appear before the military equivalent of a grand jury Nov. 5 to establish whether there is sufficient evidence for a court-martial.

Accusations against generals cast shadow over Army 10/28/12 [Last modified: Sunday, October 28, 2012 10:21pm]
Photo reprints | Article reprints

Copyright: For copyright information, please check with the distributor of this item, Washington Post.

Join the discussion: Click to view comments, add yours