Make us your home page

Antitax pledge loses some GOP allegiance

WASHINGTON — In GOP activist circles, it is known simply as the pledge, and over the past 25 years, it has become the essential conservative credential for a whole generation of Republicans seeking elective office in a party defined by its implacable opposition to raising taxes.

Of the 242 Republicans serving in the House of Representatives, all but six have signed the antitax pledge that has emerged as a key enforcement mechanism of the Republican orthodoxy on taxes.

But now an increasing number of Republicans running for Congress are declining to sign the pledge. It is a small sign that could signal a big shift in the GOP's politics on taxes amid spiraling national deficits.

Of the 25 candidates this year promoted by the National Republican Congressional Committee as "Young Guns" and "Contenders" — the top rungs of a program highlighting promising candidates challenging Democrats or running in open seats — at least a third have indicated they do not plan to sign the pledge.

Two of the seven candidates promoted by the NRCC as the "Young Gun Vanguard" — candidates competing in open seats that are considered Republican-leaning — have declined to sign.

Written by antitax crusader Grover Norquist, the pledge compels candidates to resist any effort to raise tax rates for individuals or businesses. They also pledge to oppose the elimination of tax credits and deductions unless they are matched dollar-for-dollar with other tax cuts.

Norquist insists that Americans for Tax Reform, the powerful group he founded in 1986, is ahead of schedule in collecting pledge signatures from congressional candidates for the year.

But among Republican challengers, there are defections.

Republican candidates declining to sign generally indicate that they nevertheless oppose tax hikes. But some are chaffing against the constraint on eliminating tax loopholes, believing those restrictions limit Republicans' ability to negotiate seriously with Democrats on a deal to tackle the nation's mounting debt.

In Pennsylvania, Republican state Rep. Scott Perry said he was disappointed to see his party's presidential candidates — all but one of whom signed the pledge — uniformly indicate in a debate last year that they would reject a deficit reduction deal that paired $1 in revenue increases for every $10 in spending cuts.

"I just think it's imprudent to hem yourself in where you can't make a good agreement that overall supports the things you want to do," said Perry, who recently won a Republican primary in a conservative district over candidates who had signed the pledge.

Others insist they can make promises to voters without signing a pledge circulated by a Washington lobbying group, a sign that Democrats might be having some success at painting Norquist as a D.C. insider instead of the antiestablishment rebel he portrays himself as.

"If there's a loophole that can be closed that ends up generating additional revenue that can be used specifically to pay down the national debt, I'm not going to lose sleep," said Richard Tisei, an NRCC "Young Gun" and former Republican state senator in Massachusetts running against Democratic Rep. John Tierney. "And I don't want to be bound by the pledge not to close it."

A handful of incumbent Republicans who signed the pledge when they first ran for office are also rejecting it.

Rep. Scott Rigell, a Republican freshman from Virginia who signed the pledge in 2010, recently posted an open letter to constituents indicating he would not renew the promise as he runs for re-election for fear it could stand in the way of an everything-on-the-table approach to tackling mounting debt.

This month, Norquist's organization helped Indiana state Treasurer Richard Mourdock defeat six-term Sen. Richard Lugar in a Republican primary.

In an interview, Norquist said the pledge is as strong as ever.

"The pledge isn't what keeps them from raising taxes," he said. "It's what confirms to voters that they won't raise taxes."

Antitax pledge loses some GOP allegiance 05/25/12 [Last modified: Friday, May 25, 2012 11:28pm]
Photo reprints | Article reprints

Copyright: For copyright information, please check with the distributor of this item, Washington Post.

Join the discussion: Click to view comments, add yours