Clear49° FULL FORECASTClear49° FULL FORECAST
Make us your home page
Instagram

Clinton gives forceful defense of U.S. response to Benghazi attacks

Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton offers various reactions during her six-hour testimony Wednesday on Capitol Hill.

Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton offers various reactions during her six-hour testimony Wednesday on Capitol Hill.

WASHINGTON — In what was likely her final major public appearance as secretary of state, Hillary Rodham Clinton spent Wednesday delivering a forceful defense of the Obama administration's response to the murders of four Americans in Libya last year and praising the commitment of America's diplomats.

Clinton, who returned to work this month after suffering a concussion and blood clot in early December, spent six hours testifying and answering questions. She started at 9 a.m. before the Senate Foreign Relations Committee and ended after 5 p.m. with the House Foreign Affairs Committee.

Clinton's long-awaited testimony provided little in the way of new information about the Benghazi attacks. But confronting her critics and delivering a spirited defense of the administration's response was essential to the effort to put the tragedy behind her as she leaves a job for which she has received wide praise and contemplates a possible run for president in 2016.

At times, the usually composed Clinton was emotional, choking up as she described meeting the caskets of U.S. Ambassador J. Christopher Stevens and the three other Americans who died in the attack on Benghazi, Libya, on Sept. 11. Occasionally her patience wore thin. After one Republican pressed Clinton on the administration's shifting explanations for the attack — which it initially described as the result of a protest — she pounded the table.

"What difference, at this point, does it make?" Clinton demanded. "It is our job to figure out what happened and do everything we can to prevent it from ever happening again."

She reiterated that she takes responsibility for what an independent investigation called security lapses and systemic failures within the State Department. But she rejected all suggestions by Republicans that there had been a coverup in the aftermath of the assault. She also said she never saw requests for more security in Libya made by Stevens and others.

Controversy over the Benghazi attacks has dogged the administration for months. Republican accusations that U.N. Ambassador Susan Rice gave a misleading description of the events leading up to the attack led her to withdraw from consideration to replace Clinton, opening the door for the nomination of Sen. John Kerry, D-Mass.

An investigation by an Accountability Review Board appointed by the State Department faulted the department for security shortcomings and failing to heed warnings about the dangers in Benghazi and elsewhere in Libya. The board recommended sweeping changes in security and a re-evaluation of the way the department spends money and Congress provides it.

Clinton pledged to adopt all 29 recommendations from the review board, saying that many are already being implemented. But she insisted that diplomats must be able to travel and work in dangerous places in order to do their jobs.

The promises did not satisfy her toughest critics. Rep. Ileana Ros-Lehtinen, R-Miami, called it "outrageous" that Clinton was not interviewed by the investigators who conducted the independent review.

"I was not asked to speak," Clinton said, adding that she would have done so if the investigators had thought it important.

For the most part, questions from Democrats were prefaced with praise for Clinton's tenure as secretary and focused on ways to improve diplomatic security. Republicans were harsher.

Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., greeted Clinton politely, but switched tone quickly, telling her "your answers are not satisfactory to me." He said that "numerous warnings" about militant activity in Libya were not addressed and that the State Department's desire for a "soft footprint" in the country "was to some degree responsible for what took place."

Sen. Rand Paul, R-Ky., said he would have fired Clinton if he had been president, eliciting a gasp from one onlooker. Rep. Dana Rohrabacher, R-Calif., trying to pin Clinton down later in the day, observed, "everybody has their own CYA to do here."

On a lighter note, Rep. Steve Chabot, R-Ohio, drew chuckles when he wished Clinton "the best in your future endeavors — mostly."

Clinton, who lost the Democratic nomination to President Obama in 2008, had always said she would serve only one term in his Cabinet. Kerry, though still chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, chose not to participate in the hearing to avoid the appearance of a conflict, aides said.

Clinton praised diplomats working in peril and on a shoestring, asking Congress to both free up existing funds and provide more money for security at high-risk embassies and other diplomatic posts worldwide.

Clinton cast the attacks that killed Stevens, diplomat Sean Smith and CIA contractors Tyrone Woods and Glen Doherty as part of a larger rise of militancy across a vast swath of northern Africa and the Middle East.

"We are in a new reality. We are trying to make sense of changes that nobody had predicted but which we're going to have to live with," she said. "Let's be honest with ourselves. Let's avoid turning everything into a political football."

Clinton's voice broke as she described receiving the caskets of the dead Americans at Joint Base Andrews a few days after the attacks.

"For me, this is not just a matter of policy. It's personal," she said, choking up. "I stood next to President Obama as the Marines carried those flag-draped caskets off the plane at Andrews. I put my arms around the mothers and fathers, the sisters and brothers, the sons and daughters, and the wives left alone to raise their children."

Testimony excerpts

Rep. Jeff Duncan, R- S.C.: "Madam Secretary, you let the consulate become a death trap. And that's national security malpractice. You said you take responsibility. What does responsibility mean, Madam Secretary?"

Clinton: "We are working diligently, overtime to implement their recommendations. That is my responsibility. I'm going to do everything I can before I finish my tenure."

Sen. Rand Paul, R-Ky., questioned Clinton's leadership, saying it was "inexcusable" that she did not read the relevant cables before the attack and that "cost these people their lives." He told Clinton if he had been president at the time of the Benghazi attack "I would have relieved you of your post. I think it's inexcusable that you did not know about this."

Clinton said that there had been personnel removed from their jobs and placed on administrative leave after the independent review. She said the accountability board put into place was intended to take the investigation "out of the heat of politics" and into the hands of those who "have no stake in the outcome."

Sen. Ron Johnson, R-Wis. questioned Clinton about the State Department's immediate response, saying that officials "misled" the American people.

Clinton: "What difference at this point does it make? Was it because of a protest, or was it because of guys out for a walk one night who decided they'd go kill some Americans? What difference, at this point, does it make? It is our job to figure out what happened and do everything we can to prevent it from ever happening again, Senator. The fact is that people were trying in real time to get to the best information."

Sen. Marco Rubio, R-Fla., asked Clinton about what steps were being taken to make sure that Libya meets its responsibility as a host country to provide adequate security for embassy personnel.

Clinton: "What I found with the Libyans was willingness but not capacity. The Libyans were very responsive, willing but no levers to pull." She added that the United States was trying to "help them build a decent security force."

New York Times

Clinton gives forceful defense of U.S. response to Benghazi attacks 01/23/13 [Last modified: Wednesday, January 23, 2013 11:09pm]
Photo reprints | Article reprints

Copyright: For copyright information, please check with the distributor of this item, Washington Post.
    

Join the discussion: Click to view comments, add yours

Loading...