Make us your home page

'Grand bargain' on federal deficit still on the table

WASHINGTON — Even as President Barack Obama and congressional leaders focus on a fallback plan to lift the nation's debt ceiling, top Democrats and Republicans have begun to map a new way to craft the same sort of ambitious deficit-cutting plan they abandoned last week.

As part of the deal being discussed to raise the debt ceiling, leaders on Capitol Hill are forming an especially powerful congressional committee that would be charged with drawing up a new "grand bargain," possibly by the end of the year.

Key elements for a big deal remain in place. Obama has been clear that he wants one and has started making the case to skeptical factions of his own party that getting the nation's fiscal house in order is in their best interest. House Speaker John Boehner, R-Ohio, also remains committed to an ambitious plan, having told his troops that he didn't become speaker to do small things. And, perhaps most critically, the markets are demanding it. The credit rating agency Standard & Poor's says Washington must agree to reduce the debt by $4 trillion over 10 years to avert a downgrade.

"We cannot as a country fail to deal with the debt threat," said Senate Budget Committee Chairman Kent Conrad, D-N.D., one of the bipartisan "Gang of Six" senators who tried to reach an agreement in recent months. "Every serious economic analysis tells us we've reached the danger zone. And just kicking the can down the road? That can't be. We're better than that. We've got to be better than that."

But hopes for a grand resolution in coming months face the same question that hangs over the current crisis: whether tea party-aligned conservatives in Congress who forced the debt-ceiling showdown will provide the necessary votes for an eventual major deal if it includes new taxes.

The Gang of Six — which tried to come up with its own plan — has apparently disbanded over the possibility of new taxes. The big deal pursued by Obama and Boehner faltered amid criticism from congressional Republicans opposed to additional revenue.

House Majority Leader Eric Cantor, R-Va., who has emerged as the leader of this contingent, has argued against such a deal. But his views may be shifting along with those of some rank-and-file House Republicans whose imaginations have been captivated by the idea of slicing as much as $5 trillion out of the federal budget over the next decade.

In a caucus meeting last week, some freshmen wanted to know whether they could slice that much out of the budget in the next two years, GOP aides said. (Answer: No. The entire federal government is expected to spend about $3.6 trillion this year.)

In public at least, conservatives are maintaining that the answer is to "cut, cap and balance" — passing a balanced-budget amendment that would cap federal spending at 18 percent of the nation's gross domestic product, down from its current 24 percent.

The House is expected to vote Tuesday on such an amendment, but it has scant odds of getting the needed supermajority in the Senate. Democrats say an 18 percent cap in a country with an aging population and rising health care costs would lead to ruinous cuts.

But conservatives said Saturday that they are holding out for the amendment and are not ready to accept a stopgap measure being put together by Senate leaders Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., and Harry Reid, D-Nev., that would raise the debt ceiling before the nation hits its borrowing limit Aug. 2.

"I didn't get elected to punt this problem down the road another six months," said Rep. Jason Chaffetz, R-Utah. "We are the body, we are the commission to make these tough decisions. … Guys like me are not coming along. We're not going along just to get along."

Rep. Allen West, R-Plantation, was equally blunt. "The quote-unquote McConnell-Reid plan is no plan. That's the abdication of the responsibilities of our Congress," he said. "It's nothing but the typical D.C. two-step, and I'm not going to be part of that."

Under the stopgap plan, Congress would allow Obama to raise the debt ceiling in three increments totaling $2.5 trillion over the next year. Each time, Congress would vote on a resolution of disapproval, allowing Republicans to blame the increases on Obama.

To get backing from House Republicans, McConnell and Reid are adding $1.5 trillion in spending cuts. And they are drawing up the committee, with six lawmakers from each party, which would report by the end of the year.

The committee would resemble the fiscal commission chaired last year by Alan Simpson and Erskine Bowles, minus presidential appointees. But its path would be easier: The panel will require only a simple majority to report a plan to Congress, it would be protected from Senate filibuster and it would not be subject to amendment, similar to the system used for closing military bases.

The Bowles-Simpson commission recommended saving $3.8 trillion by raising the retirement age for Social Security, slashing spending across government and wiping out more than $100 billion a year in popular tax breaks, including the tax deduction for mortgage interest and the tax-free treatment of employer-provided health insurance. It recommended larger Pentagon cuts and revenue increases than the White House sought this month.

The Gang of Six arrived at about $4.65 trillion in savings, according to Conrad, but disbanded after failing to get buy-in from its Republican members, especially Sen. Tom Coburn of Oklahoma. Coburn plans to offer his own proposal on Monday, the most ambitious yet, with $9.5 trillion in savings.

Obama calls

for compromise

President Barack Obama called Saturday on both parties in Congress to compromise to pass legislation needed by Aug. 2 to prevent the U.S. government from defaulting on its loan obligations. "Let's be honest — neither party in this town is blameless. Both have talked this problem to death without doing enough about it. That's what drives people nuts about Washington," Obama said in his weekly Internet and radio address. "I'm willing to do what it takes to solve this problem, even if it's not politically popular. And I expect leaders in Congress to show that same willingness to compromise," he added. In the Republicans' address Saturday, Sen. Orrin Hatch of Utah argued for passage of a balanced-budget amendment. He blamed Democrats for failing to embrace adequate budget cuts and said "the solution to a spending crisis is not tax increases."

Times wires

'Grand bargain' on federal deficit still on the table 07/16/11 [Last modified: Saturday, July 16, 2011 10:43pm]
Photo reprints | Article reprints

Copyright: For copyright information, please check with the distributor of this item, Washington Post.

Join the discussion: Click to view comments, add yours