Make us your home page

Israel criticizes U.N. nuclear proposal

JERUSALEM — Israel on Saturday sharply criticized an action plan on nuclear weapons agreed to by the United States and 188 other countries, rebuffing its most novel proposal — a conference in 2012 to discuss ridding the Middle East of weapons of mass destruction.

The action plan stressed the "importance" of Israel joining the Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty but did not mention Iran's expanding atomic program, the Israeli government noted.

The agreement, reached a day earlier, had put U.S. officials in an awkward position: Rejecting it would have spelled failure for a month-long conference on the treaty, which has curbed the spread of nuclear weapons for 40 years. But accepting it created a new source of tension between the allies, just days before a visit to Washington by Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu.

In a statement Saturday, the Israeli government called the plan "deeply flawed," adding that "it ignores the realities of the Middle East and the real threats facing the region and the entire world."

The plan "singles out Israel, the Middle East's only true democracy and the only country threatened with annihilation," the statement said. "Yet the terrorist regime in Iran, which is racing to develop nuclear weapons and which openly threatens to wipe Israel off the map, is not even mentioned."

Netanyahu is scheduled to meet with President Barack Obama on Tuesday to discuss Iran, the peace process with the Palestinians and the treaty resolution.

The U.S. delegation at the treaty review in New York had fought to excise all mentions of Israel in the final document. But on Thursday evening, as delegations prepared for a last round of talks, the conference president informed them that the latest draft of the text was a take-it-or-leave-it document, officials said. Final treaty documents require a consensus.

Israel criticizes U.N. nuclear proposal 05/29/10 [Last modified: Saturday, May 29, 2010 9:53pm]
Photo reprints | Article reprints

Copyright: For copyright information, please check with the distributor of this item, Washington Post.

Join the discussion: Click to view comments, add yours