Make us your home page

Supreme Court weighs in on donations, judicial bias

WASHINGTON — Elected judges must disqualify themselves from cases involving people who spent exceptionally large sums to put them on the bench, the Supreme Court ruled on Monday in a 5-4 decision.

The decision, the first to say the Constitution's due process clause has a role to play in policing the role of money in judicial elections, ordered the chief justice of the West Virginia Supreme Court to recuse himself from a $50 million case against a coal company whose chief executive had spent $3 million to elect him.

Thirty-nine states elect at least some of their judges. Elected judges routinely accept contributions from lawyers and litigants who appear before them, and they seldom disqualify themselves for cases involving donors.

Justice Anthony Kennedy, writing for the majority in a decision that split along familiar ideological lines, said the Constitution required disqualification when an interested party's spending had a "disproportionate influence" in a case that was "pending or imminent."

The practice of electing judges is all but unknown in the rest of the world. Federal judges are appointed.

In the West Virginia case, Chief Justice Brent Benjamin, the beneficiary of the coal executive's spending, twice joined the majority in 3-2 decisions throwing out the $50 million jury verdict against the company, Massey Energy. Benjamin said there was no objective reason to suggest he could not rule fairly in the case.

"We do not question his subjective findings of impartiality and propriety," Kennedy wrote of Benjamin in Monday's decision, Caperton vs. A.T. Massey Coal Co. "Nor do we determine whether there was actual bias."

Other decisions

by the court

Iraq: Ruled that the current government in Iraq cannot be held responsible for the actions of Saddam Hussein's regime. The high court unanimously turned away lawsuits from Americans who were held in Iraq during the Gulf War. The court said a federal law enacted in 2003 gave Iraq back the immunity that was stripped because of the Hussein government's designation as a sponsor of terrorism.

Camp Lejeune: Refused to hear a Marine's lawsuit blaming the government's dumping of toxic chemicals at Camp Lejeune in North Carolina for his son's illnesses. Donal McLean Snyder Jr. argued the dumping of trichloroethylene, an ingredient in cleaning solvents, in the 1970s polluted the water and made his son ill.

Associated Press

Supreme Court weighs in on donations, judicial bias 06/08/09 [Last modified: Monday, June 8, 2009 11:15pm]
Photo reprints | Article reprints

Copyright: For copyright information, please check with the distributor of this item, New York Times.

Join the discussion: Click to view comments, add yours