Talks stall over Iranian nuclear access

WASHINGTON — The U.N. nuclear agency said Friday that it had failed to reach agreement with Iran on gaining access to suspected atomic research sites, dampening hopes for a breakthrough during high-level nuclear talks scheduled this month.

In an unusually blunt statement, officials of the International Atomic Energy Agency called the outcome of Friday's meeting "disappointing" and said Iran appeared to retreat from commitments it had made during earlier meetings in the Iranian capital.

"There has been no progress, and indeed Iran raised issues that we have already discussed and added new ones," Herman Nackaerts, the IAEA deputy director general, said after the talks concluded in Vienna.

No date was set for future negotiations, which were aimed at clearing up a years-long dispute over allegations of secret nuclear weapons research conducted by Iranian scientists nearly a decade ago.

The IAEA has been particularly eager to visit Iran's Parchin military base, where Iranian scientists are alleged to have tested explosive triggers for nuclear weapons inside a large, tanker-shaped test chamber.

Iran says such experiments — detailed in documents obtained by Western spy agencies — never occurred, but it has refused to allow IAEA officials near the site since 2005. Satellite photos in recent weeks have shown major renovation underway at the site, with several buildings razed and soil removed near the place where the alleged test chamber once stood. Iran has consistently said that its nuclear program is for peaceful purposes, not making weapons.

The setback in negotiations occurred less than three weeks after IAEA officials claimed success in persuading Iran to grant its inspectors access to key facilities and scientists said to have been involved in the weapons research. IAEA chief Yukiya Amano, after traveling to Iran on May 20, said the agency expected to sign a formal agreement within days spelling out the terms of the deal.

Since then, nuclear diplomacy with Iran has taken a negative turn. On May 24, Iran balked at a plan offered by six world powers that called for strict limits on Iran's nuclear activities, in part to assuage concerns that Tehran is seeking a nuclear weapons capability.

And Iranian leaders have struck a defiant tone this week in public statements about an upcoming round of negotiations set to begin June 18 in Moscow. The talks will be the third this year between Iran and the P5-plus-1 block, which consists of the United States, Britain, China, France, Germany and Russia.

Sen. James M. Inhofe, R-Okla., is raising questions about Brett McGurk, President Barack Obama's nominee for ambassador to Iraq, after leaked emails surfaced purporting to show that McGurk had a relationship with an Iraq correspondent for The Wall Street Journal while he was the top Iraq adviser to the White House under President George W. Bush.

Inhofe has not yet put a hold on McGurk's nomination, an aide said. But the senator did cancel a planned meeting with the nominee.

"I don't think we'd say we've reached the decision point yet," Jared Young, Inhofe's press secretary, said Friday in an interview.

The emails did not come up during a Senate Foreign Relations Committee hearing for McGurk earlier this week. The panel has not voted on the nomination.

McGurk was a senior White House adviser and lead negotiator of the failed talks on the U.S. troop presence in Iraq in 2008 when he began a relationship with Gina Chon, an Iraq correspondent with The Wall Street Journal, according to the leaked emails, which were posted Tuesday, the day before his Senate hearing, on the Cryptome website.

McGurk and Chon are now married.

"I'm not going to get into emails between Mr. McGurk and the woman who subsequently became his wife," a State Department spokeswoman, Victoria Nuland, said Friday. "With regard to Mr. McGurk's nomination, I think you know that he spent the better part of the last decade serving our country in and out of Iraq, working for a Republican administration, a Democratic administration.

"He is, in our view, uniquely qualified to serve as our ambassador, and we urge the Senate to act quickly on his nomination."

Talks stall over Iranian nuclear access 06/08/12 [Last modified: Friday, June 8, 2012 11:53pm]

Copyright: For copyright information, please check with the distributor of this item, Washington Post.
    

Join the discussion: Click to view comments, add yours

Loading...