Three State Department officials resign over failures cited in Libya report

WASHINGTON — Three senior State Department officials in charge of diplomatic security resigned Wednesday after an independent panel found "systematic failures" in leadership that contributed to security lapses in the deadly Sept. 11 attacks on U.S. posts in eastern Libya.

Members of the Accountability Review Board, appointed by Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton in the aftermath of the deadly attacks, presented their findings to the Senate and House foreign relations committees in closed hearings, with top State Department officials scheduled to appear in open sessions today to answer the report's sharp criticisms of security conditions at the time of the siege that killed Ambassador Chris Stevens and three other Americans in Benghazi.

The report stopped short of deeming the lapses a dereliction of duty, which would have required proof of intentional misconduct, and instead blamed poor leadership of senior officials for leaving the Benghazi consulate a highly vulnerable target in a volatile city where other visiting diplomats already had shut down operations or taken more precautions.

"We did conclude that certain State Department bureau-level senior officials in critical positions of authority and responsibility in Washington demonstrated a lack of leadership and management ability appropriate for senior ranks in their responses to security concerns," retired Adm. Michael Mullen, former chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff and deputy chairman of the review board, told reporters Wednesday.

Three of those officials resigned after the findings were made public: Eric Boswell, assistant secretary of state for diplomatic security; Charlene Lamb, deputy assistant secretary in charge of embassy security; and a third unidentified official with the Bureau of Near Eastern Affairs, a congressional official told McClatchy Newspapers. The resignations were first reported by the Associated Press.

The State Department would neither confirm nor deny the resignations. At least one lawmaker on the foreign affairs committees, however, acknowledged the resignations in a statement on the review board's findings.

"The report made strong recommendations regarding personnel who should be held accountable, and I am pleased that some individuals in positions of responsibility have resigned today," said Sen. Marco Rubio, R-Fla., a member of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee.

"However, such resignations are a small step toward addressing this issue, which can only be fully resolved by an open and transparent internal review of the State Department's relevant policies, operations and procedures."

The consulate in Benghazi, according to the review board's report, had an inadequate number of security agents and a lack of protective equipment, and was overseen by officials who failed to appreciate and craft a response to the city's rapidly deteriorating security situation. The Libyan militia that was assigned to protect U.S. convoys was on strike at the time of the attack, upset over wages and working hours.

While the report doesn't fill in the gaps on what the Obama administration knew about the attacks and when, the panel did find that there was no anti-American demonstration preceding the attack, as senior officials once had insisted.

"The board concluded that there was no protest prior to the attacks, which were unanticipated in their scale and intensity," stated the unclassified version of the report that was released publicly.

Intelligence agency reports failed to provide any "immediate, specific tactical warning" of the Sept. 11 attacks, the panel found, adding that "known gaps existed in the intelligence community's understanding of extremist militias in Libya and the potential threat they posed to U.S. interests."

Report

also faults

Stevens

WASHINGTON — Perhaps the most uncomfortable aspect of an independent panel's review of the deadly Sept. 11 attacks on U.S. posts in Benghazi is that part of the blame for security lapses lay with the incident's most prominent casualty: Ambassador Chris Stevens.

The Accountability Review Board's report, released late Tuesday and the subject of congressional hearings this week, praised Stevens as "an exceptional practitioner of modern diplomacy" who personified the U.S. commitment to a democratic Libya. However, the report suggests on numerous pages, Stevens also failed to respond seriously to the deteriorating security situation around him, while his prominent stature made Washington unusually deferential to him on security and policy matters.

As chief of mission for Libya, the report's authors said, Stevens would have been the authority on the dangers posed to U.S. interests.

The two top officials on the review board, retired Ambassador Thomas Pickering and retired Adm. Michael Mullen, chose their words carefully at a news conference Wednesday as they weighed Stevens' responsibility in the security lapses, saying that he did support having more security personnel.

"As the chief of mission, he certainly had a responsibility in that regard, and actually he was very security conscious and increasingly concerned about security," Mullen said. "But part of his responsibility is certainly to make that case back here, and he had not gotten to that point where you would, you might get to a point where you would be considering, 'It's so dangerous, we might close the mission.' "

Three State Department officials resign over failures cited in Libya report 12/19/12 [Last modified: Wednesday, December 19, 2012 10:41pm]

Copyright: For copyright information, please check with the distributor of this item, McClatchyTribune.
    

Join the discussion: Click to view comments, add yours

Loading...