Make us your home page
Instagram

Today’s top headlines delivered to you daily.

(View our Privacy Policy)

Debating the best way to describe people of a certain age

A few days ago, a young gal asked me if I wrote about "senior citizens." I told her I hadn't written about them in years. In fact, I rarely even write about "seniors" anymore.

I'm not alone.

In its recent magazine, the AARP avoided the word "seniors" until a health piece about "An ER for You" forced them to talk about a 65-plus facility designed for "seniors."

There might be references to "Medicare recipients" and other indicators of age, but that nasty word "senior," made even nastier when followed by "citizen," is carefully avoided.

Wondering why? Go back and check out that definition of "senior citizens," the one we operated under for years. It says people 60-plus are "elderly." Indeed, until 2000 the U.S. Census classified anyone 54-plus as "near elderly" and those over 60 as "elderly."

Now there's nothing wrong with being elderly. I hope I am some day.

But we don't talk about ourselves getting "elderly" anymore. Instead, we are "aging." Which equates with ripening on the vine. Growing mature. Reaching our potential.

Yes, we're hopelessly confused about words.

SeniorPeopleMeet.com, an online dating service, says it's a site for people 45-plus but technically "seniors" are of retirement age, according to the U.S. government. In fact, seniors get Medicare so they must be 65.

So why not agingpeoplemeet.com? Sounds awful, right?

The conundrum is, of course, the result of our extended life span.

The term "senior" theoretically covers everyone from the oldest boomer through the Greatest Generation to centenarians, those over 100.

Indeed, the New England Centenarian Study at Boston University has found centenarians now occur at a rate of about one per 6,000. When the study began in 1994, the rate was one centenarian per about 10,000 people.

No, no, no. This is not a discussion of rising health care costs.

I'm talking about verbiage.

Who are we at 65? And 110? Are we all "seniors" who are "aging" or are we "old" or "elderly"?

Why do so many of us balk at "senior citizens"? A friend says it is because she associates "senior citizens" with the old people who needed a daily hot meal at a senior center because they were eating cat food for lunch. That was before government benefits for 65-plus people.

Let's go back to that AARP magazine and an article on unleashing your inner genius. The article talks about Mack Orr, a 65-year-old Memphis bluesman who did not begin playing the guitar until he was 45 — or "middle-aged," as the article describes him.

Today, he's "part of a groundswell of older Americans finding deep fulfillment through the arts and immersing themselves in new pursuits later in life."

There's that "older" phrase again.

Then there's the piece on how technology can be a safety net and help you "age" in place. The piece even includes a description of how some technologies can help you overcome those "senior moments" of forgetfulness.

Even an organization representing 30 million 50-plus Americans doesn't know what to call its members, because the label is bound to offend someone.

I was leaving my doctor's office the other day after joking with one of the staffers about my aches and pains.

"Don't tell me you're getting old," she said, laughing.

"I'm not old. I'm aging," I blurted.

But am I, really?

Jane Glenn Haas can be reached at jghaas@cox.net.

Debating the best way to describe people of a certain age 11/23/10 [Last modified: Tuesday, November 23, 2010 3:30am]
Photo reprints | Article reprints

Copyright: For copyright information, please check with the distributor of this item, Orange County (Calif.) Register.
    

Join the discussion: Click to view comments, add yours

Loading...
  1. No toll lanes north of downtown Tampa in three of four interstate proposals

    Transportation

    TAMPA — Express lanes may not be coming to downtown Tampa after all. Or at least not to the stretch of Interstate 275 that goes north through Bearss Avenue.

    Seminole Heights resident Kimberly Overman discusses the new interstate options with V.M. Ybor resident Chris Vela (left), Hillsborough County Commissioner Pat Kemp and HNTB consultant Chloe Coney during a Tampa Bay Express meeting Monday night at the Barrymore Hotel. [CAITLIN JOHNSTON  |  Times]
  2. No lack of issues facing St. Petersburg's six council candidates

    Elections

    ST. PETERSBURG — The six candidates for City Council gathered Monday evening in the very chamber to which they aspire to serve.

    St. Petersburg City Council candidates (from left)  Brandi Gabbard and Barclay Harless in District 2; Jerick Johnston and incumbent council member Darden Rice in District 4; and Justin Bean and Gina Driscoll of District 6. All six candidates appeared at Monday night's forum at City Hall sponsored by the League of Women Voters. [CHERIE DIEZ   |   Times]

  3. Iraq's Kurds vote on independence, raising regional fears

    World

    IRBIL, Iraq — Iraqi Kurds voted Monday in a landmark referendum on supporting independence, a move billed by the Kurdish leadership as an exercise in self-determination but viewed as a hostile act by Iraq's central government. Neighboring Turkey even threatened a military response.

    People celebrate Monday after voting closed in a referendum on independence in Irbil, Iraq.
  4. North Korean diplomat says Trump has 'declared war'

    War

    UNITED NATIONS — North Korea's top diplomat said Monday that President Donald Trump's weekend tweet was a "declaration of war" and North Korea has the right to retaliate by shooting down U.S. bombers, even in international airspace.

    North Korean Foreign Minister Ri Yong Ho, center, speaks outside the U.N. Plaza Hotel in New York on Monday.
  5. Pinellas grants St. Pete's request to add millions to pier budget

    Local Government

    Times Staff Writer

    The Pinellas County Commission has granted St. Petersburg Mayor Rick Kriseman's request to dedicate millions more toward the city's new pier.

    The St. Petersburg City Council on Thursday  voted 7-1 to appropriate $17.6 million for the over-water portion of the Pier District. This is a rendering of what the new Pier District could look like. [Courtesy of St. Petersburg]