Make us your home page

Today’s top headlines delivered to you daily.

(View our Privacy Policy)

Next Steps

Son hopes father's prenup protects his inheritance

Q: As an only child, my father named me beneficiary of his profit-sharing plan at work after he and my mother divorced.

When he remarried, he insisted on a premarital agreement by which my stepmother gave up her rights to all assets that my father did not will to her. When he died unexpectedly, half of his property was willed to her and half to me; however, she is now claiming the profit-sharing plan even though I am still the beneficiary.

My lawyer — the same one who represented my father and prepared the premarital agreement — says "no way" because she gave up her rights before they married. There is quite a bit of money at stake.

Do I have anything to worry about?

A: You sure do. The benefit paid after the death of a married employee goes to the spouse in the form of a survivor annuity unless the spouse agrees in writing to the employee's election of another beneficiary.

Since the premarital agreement was signed before the marriage and therefore before she became a spouse, your stepmother had no rights to waive. These waivers must be signed after the premarital agreement and marriage.

Bottom line: She is probably entitled to the profit-sharing plan. Given the complexities involved in employee benefits, either research or getting an opinion from an expert in the field would have been wise.

In our opinion, you should revisit this question with your lawyer.

Nursing home errs in trying to discharge man

Q: My mother's last illness — she died two years ago — left my father almost destitute. Aside from Social Security and a small pension (totaling less than $800 per month), he has his house and little more.

Early this year, at age 87, my father fell and broke his hip. After being hospitalized for surgery, he was discharged to a nursing home for rehabilitation, which did not go well at all.

He is still unable to walk, get out of bed, go to the bathroom, etc., and his doctor says that he has reached maximum improvement.

His nursing home care was paid for by Medicare and, since he had a Medigap policy, there were no charges for him during his stay in the nursing home.

But after 85 days into his stay, the nursing home staff told my brother and me that they could not do anything more for my father and would have to discharge him unless we could pay $6,700 per month to keep him there as a private-pay patient.

When we told them that he had been approved for Medicaid, the nursing home told us that they did not have a Medicaid bed and that we could either pay privately or take him home.

His doctor says that he needs to be watched around the clock, an expense that he — and we — cannot afford.

What can we do to make sure our father gets the care he needs?

A: Under the facts as you state them, the nursing home cannot discharge your father, and you need to hire an experienced elder law attorney.

The actions threatened by the facility violate federal and state regulations which provide, in pertinent part, that the facility can not transfer or discharge your father unless (a) the facility cannot meet your father's needs, which is clearly not the case; (b) your father's health has improved to the extent that he no longer needs long-term care, which is clearly not the case; or (c) your father has failed, after reasonable and appropriate notice, to pay for (or to have paid under Medicare or Medicaid) his stay at the facility, which is clearly not the case.

As the facility knows, conversion to Medicaid does not allow them to discharge your father.

In addition, before transferring or discharging a resident, the facility must (a) give 30 days' notice to the resident and family member of the proposed transfer or discharge, (b) state in writing the reason(s) for the discharge, the date of the discharge and the location of the place to which the resident is to be transferred or discharged; and (c) state that the resident has the right to appeal to the state agency that administers the Medicaid Program in your state.

The names/designations of the agencies vary from state to state.

By telling you and your brother that your father could stay if you and he guarantee that you will pay the private pay rate, the facility has again breached the federal and state guidelines in that a facility cannot require a third-party guarantee of payment to the facility as a condition of admission, expedited admission or continued stay in the facility.

If your father is qualified for Medicaid, the facility cannot charge, solicit, accept or receive — in addition to any amount otherwise required to be paid under the state plan — any gift, money, donation or other consideration as a precondition of admission, expedited admission or continued stay in the facility.

It is unfortunate that nursing facilities accept patients, take Medicare or private pay, and then try to discharge the patients when they run out of money — but it happens.

Jan Warner is a member of the National Academy of Elder Law Attorneys and has been practicing law for more than 30 years. Jan Collins is editor of the Business and Economic Review published by the University of South Carolina and a special correspondent for The Economist. You can learn more information about elder care law and write to the authors on

Son hopes father's prenup protects his inheritance 04/27/09 [Last modified: Monday, April 27, 2009 4:30am]
Photo reprints | Article reprints


Join the discussion: Click to view comments, add yours

  1. Iraqi forces sweep into Kirkuk, checking Kurdish independence drive


    KIRKUK, Iraq — After weeks of threats and posturing, the Iraqi government began a military assault Monday to curb the independence drive by the nation's Kurdish minority, wresting oil fields and a contested city from separatists pushing to break away from Iraq.

    Iraqi security forces patrol Monday in Tuz Khormato, about 45 miles south of Kirkuk, a disputed city that the government seized in response to last month’s Kurdish vote for independence.
  2. Trump and McConnell strive for unity amid rising tensions


    WASHINGTON — President Donald Trump and Sen. Mitch McConnell, the Republican leader, tried to convey a sense of harmony Monday after months of private feuding that threatened to undermine their party's legislative push in the coming weeks to enact a sweeping tax cut.

    President Donald Trump and Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell field questions Monday in the Rose Garden of the White House. “We have been friends for a long time,” Trump said.
  3. 'Me too': Alyssa Milano urged assault victims to tweet in solidarity. The response was massive.

    Human Interest

    Actor Alyssa Milano took to Twitter on Sunday with an idea, suggested by a friend, she said.

    Within hours of Alyssa Milano’s tweet, tweets with the words “me too” began appearing. By 3 a.m. Monday, almost 200,000 metoo tweets were published by Twitter’s count.
  4. Tampa tax shelter schemer too fat for his prison term, attorney says


    TAMPA — A federal judge sentenced two Bay area men to prison terms last week for peddling an offshore tax shelter scheme that cost the IRS an estimated $10 million.

    Duane Crithfield and Stephen Donaldson Sr. were sentenced to prison after marketing a fraudulent offshore tax strategy known as a "Business Protection Plan" to medical practices, offering doctors and others coverage against unlikely events such as a kidnapping.

  5. Weinstein Co., overwhelmed by backlash, may be up for sale


    NEW YORK — The Weinstein Co., besieged by sexual harassment allegations against its namesake and co-founder, may be putting itself up for sale.