Testing Grounds The latest industry being outsourced to India is clinical drug trials. And any number of tragic things can happen on the way to your medicine cabinet.
Friday Night Rewind It doesn't matter which team you cheer for. We've got video previews of every high school football program in Hillsborough, Pinellas, Pasco and Hernando County.
Is the state's offer of $1.75-billion for all of U.S. Sugar Corp.'s land and assets a good price?
Good question.
Most of the price is for U.S. Sugar's land, about 187,000 farm-rich acres in four South Florida counties. But the company's assets include much more.
There is the antebellum-style, red-brick corporate headquarters in Clewiston. A 5.5-acre, state-of-the-art cane sugar refinery. A sugar mill, warehouses, orange groves, packing plants, railroad lines, tractors, office furniture and computers. The state may not want all these accoutrements, but it's a package deal.
"They're acquiring us lock, stock and barrel," said U.S. Sugar's public relations director, Judy Sanchez. "It's soup to nuts. That's the only way we'd do the deal."
In Hendry County, U.S. Sugar's mill, refinery, packing plant and other equipment are valued by the property appraiser at $617-million. He said he could not provide a value for the company's 63,000 agricultural acres in Hendry.
Next door in Palm Beach County, the property appraiser puts the worth of U.S. Sugar's 100,076 acres at $395-million. Buildings and equipment add another $37-million.
In Glades County, the property appraiser said the company has 21,000 acres. In Gilchrist, U.S. Sugar has 80 acres and a citrus tree replacement farm.
The $1.75-billion price tag agreed upon by the state and U.S. Sugar isn't fixed, and state appraisers will determine the worth of the company before the deal is sealed.
Allen Zech, manager of the agricultural department for the Palm Beach appraiser, thinks the price is too high, especially because much of U.S. Sugar's property is muck land, inaccessible in the rainy season and not adaptable to many other forms of agriculture.
"If you figure the price is for the acreage, it's $9,000 or $10,000 an acre, and I think it should be more like $3,500 to $5,000 an acre. I don't know why anyone in their right mind would pay that much," Zech said.
Jeff Danter, director of Florida's Nature Conservancy office, sees it another way. Danter believes the U.S. Sugar land provides a huge, vital link that could reduce the cost of the multibillion-dollar state and federal effort to restore the Everglades, saving an ecosystem and protecting the water supply for South Florida.
"It could lower the cost of what else is going on there, and provide a benefit for both people and nature,'' Danter said. "In that case, the price could be a real bargain."
[Last modified: Jun 27, 2008 06:56 PM]
Comments on this article
by Marc
Jun 27, 2008 6:56 PM
We are "saving" the Everglades, and destroying the economies and tax revenues in several counties, let alone the massive loss 1700 jobs and the loss to vendors. It is a ripoff to all taxpayers and should be voted on by all Floridians. Jobs first!
by John Parke Wright IV
Jun 26, 2008 6:40 PM
Big Picture: U.S. Sugar to sell out to Florida, can work to save our Everglades, only if sugar production will stop. This is an opportunity to re-locate sugar production back to Cuba, where it is naturally produced without the same pollution effect.
by Dan
Jun 26, 2008 6:39 PM
Mr Danter is right and quality of life is beyond monetary price points.
by Rusty
Jun 26, 2008 6:39 PM
Is US Sugar getting a premium for their land? Yes, but in order to remove the largest agricultural polluter of the Everglades the State had to provide an incentive for the potential future cash flow from each acre, beyond the asset value.
by Rich
Jun 26, 2008 6:34 PM
I wonder what the price tag will be to demolish all the buildings, decontaminate the land, It's only taxpayer $$$
I have a great idea, let's tax something
Is Jeff Danter guarenteening all he says, or the suspect words COULD and
PROBABLY
by JT
Jun 26, 2008 6:34 PM
Considering that the U. S. taxpayer has been providing substantial subsidies to US Sugar over many years, there is an arguement that the company should already be in public hands. Now, what about ethanol from sugar cane?
by Denise
Jun 26, 2008 5:33 PM
Now the sugar embargo can be lifted and inexpensive ethanol from Brazil can be imported and an embargo can be place on oil from Chavez in Venezuela.
by Alex
Jun 26, 2008 4:21 PM
Police, teachers, and Everglades restoration comes from DIFFERENT POTS OF MONEY. If we weren't buying this land, the cash cannot be spent on other taks. The price is a little high, but worth it.
by Ralph
Jun 25, 2008 1:17 PM
What is wrong with this picture? Why not use this land for Ethanol production, instead of drilling off our cost. I guest Charlie is an Oil man he has just taken competition away from BIG OIL, so typical. What ever happen to save-our-homes?
by Wade
Jun 25, 2008 1:17 PM
Hey govenor. How about kicking in 25million that the Pinellas county Commision is demaning from the Sheriff's Office. Your amendment 1 is killing the Sheriff's Office!!!!! Thnx 4 nothin!
by tim
Jun 25, 2008 1:17 PM
I guess it's better than giving them a big grant to make ethanol - at our expense.
by rick
Jun 25, 2008 11:35 AM
Govenor Christ promised help with high property taxes and homeowners insurance, instead he is spending our taxes on sugar properties.We put you in that position, so we should be able to ask you to wake up or take a hike(like our Mortgage payments.
by Julia
Jun 25, 2008 11:11 AM
I think saving nature is more important then the price. The wild life chain will fix itself if we let it.
by Fred
Jun 25, 2008 11:11 AM
Is it wise to remove 700,000 tons of sugar that could be used for Ethanol from production? Do we have land elsewhere that could offset this loss? Not wise given our energy problems.
by Marty S.
Jun 25, 2008 11:00 AM
I read about corrections deputies being laid-off and school workers being laid-off and I ask myself, "Where is the state getting $1.75 BILLION to buy unfarmable swamp land?"
by Todd
Jun 25, 2008 11:00 AM
I've got a couple of bridges over the everglades i'd be happy to sell to Charlie too! This is the dumbest thing i've ever heard of. Pay teachers, cops & firemen, then worry about buying swampland, buildings & equipment we DON'T EVEN WANT! Not now!
Subscribe to the Times
Click here for daily delivery
of the St. Petersburg Times.