Make us your home page

A chance to have your say on airline ticketing policies

How often has that eye-catching $79 airfare actually cost $79? Exactly never.

Nobody minded much when airlines tacked on a few more bucks for government taxes and fees. At least they totaled up the final price before you hit the "purchase'' button.

But the onslaught of fees — bag fees, reserved seat fees, early boarding fees and the like — now can launch that ticket price into the stratosphere after you've already agreed to buy the basic transportation.

Enter Uncle Sam. On June 2, the Department of Transportation filed a bundle of proposed consumer protection rules that took up 23 pages of small type in the Federal Register.

Passengers denied boarding on oversold flights would get more money. Travelers could cancel reservations within 24 hours without penalty (some airlines already allow it). The feds might even ban peanuts on flights or establish "peanut-free zones'' to protect fliers allergic to the snack.

None of the ideas would impact more travelers than DOT's ideas for making airlines disclose the full ticket price, fees and all, before a buyer pulls the trigger.

"Consumers never really know what they're paying,'' says Charlie Leocha, director of the Consumer Travel Alliance. "You give them your credit card number, then they tell you about the additional fees.''

Major U.S. airlines and their primary trade group, haven't taken a stand yet. Carriers agree on the need for a reliable and "economically viable'' air transportation system, the Air Transport Association said. They'll consider all the proposed rules based on those standards and on "minimizing potential passenger inconvenience.''

Expect airlines to fight tooth and nail to stop new fee disclosures. Here are a few of the arguments they'll make:

How many customers will wade through a laundry list of options before taking their business elsewhere? Will airlines be forced to disclose the price of shipping of snow skis? Or the fees for a pet or an unaccompanied child?

Carriers will gripe about being the most regulated unregulated industry in the land. They'll ask, does the movie theater have to give you prices for the large popcorn and Raisinets before selling you a ticket?

Nonsense. There ought to be a way for consumers to compare the full cost of a trip without searching websites of several airlines for various fees.

The DOT hasn't embraced an answer but asks for public comment on two ideas:

• Require carriers to advertise two prices. One a "full fare'' with only the airfare and government taxes and fees. The other a full fare, plus bag charges that airlines used to provide for free (a laptop or purse, a carry-on bag and one or two checked bags. Maybe an assigned seat, too.)

• Make airline websites display a checklist of optional fees. Consumers could pick what they want and get a total price before they buy.

In the meantime, DOT officials put airlines on notice they've zeroed in on some interim steps. They include putting notice of new or increased bag fee on an airline website's home page and displaying bag fees on each passenger's e-ticket confirmation.

If airlines don't like extra government scrutiny, they've got no one to blame but themselves, outspoken aviation consultant Michael Boyd said. "The airlines are generating consumer outrage because of all these gotcha rules."

A chance to have your say on airline ticketing policies 06/15/10 [Last modified: Tuesday, June 15, 2010 11:06pm]
Photo reprints | Article reprints

© 2017 Tampa Bay Times


Join the discussion: Click to view comments, add yours

  1. Unexpected weak quarter at MarineMax slashes boating retailer shares by 20 percent


    CLEARWATER — Just then you thought it was safe to go back into the water, a boating business leader issued a small craft warning.

    Bill McGill Jr., CEO of Clearwater's MarineMax, the country's biggest recreational boat retailer. [Courtesy of MarineMax]
  2. CapTrust moving headquarters to downtown Park Tower


    TAMPA — CAPTRUST Advisors, a Raleigh, N.C.-based investment consulting firm, is moving its Tampa offices into Park Tower. CapTrust's new space will be 10,500 square feet — the entirety of the 18th floor of the downtown building, which is scheduled to undergo a multi-million-dollar renovation by 2018.

    CAPTRUST Advisors' Tampa location is moving into Park Tower. Pictured is the current CapTrust location at 102 W. Whiting St. | [Times file photo]
  3. Good news: Tampa Bay no longer a major foreclosure capital of the country

    Real Estate

    Once in the top five nationally for foreclosure filings, the Tampa Bay area no longer makes even the top 25.

    A few short years ago, Tampa Bay was a national hub for foreclosures. Not any more. [Getty Images/iStockphoto]
  4. Tampa-based start-up takes on Airbnb by promoting inclusion, diversity


    NEW TAMPA — Last May, Rohan Gilkes attempted to book a property in Idaho on the home-sharing platform Airbnb. After two failed attempts, the African-American entrepreneur asked a white friend to try, and she was "instantly" approved for the same property and dates.

    Rohan Gilkes poses for a portrait at his home and business headquarters in Tampa. 

Innclusive, a Tampa-based start-up, is a home-sharing platform that focuses on providing a positive traveling experience for minorities. Rohan Gilkes, the founder, said he created the organization after several negative experiences with Airbnb.
[CHARLIE KAIJO   |   Times]

  5. McMansions, state sewage order on tap at St. Petersburg City Council

    Local Government

    ST. PETERSBURG — The City Council is set Thursday to vote on two major issues: controversial zoning changes aimed at curbing big McMansion-style homes and a consent order with the state that will require St. Petersburg to fix its ailing sewage system.

    Two big, blocky homes on the 2300 block of Dartmouth, Ave N under construction in April. Several new homes under construction.
in St. Petersburg's Historic Kenwood Neighborhood are too big, residents complain. The St. Petersburg City Council on Thursday is set to consider ordinances aimed at curbing the construction of big "McMansions." [LARA CERRI   |   Times]