Today's paper | eEdition | Subscribe
The Truth-O-Meter
Latest print edition
St. Petersburg Times
Special report
Video report
Multimedia report
Fill out this form to email this article to a friend
Your name Your email
Recipient email
You may enter up to 20 multiple email addresses, separated by commas.
Your message
Validation Code
Hear
validation
code
  Enter validation code

New airport scanners take a peek beneath your clothes

By Steve Huettel, Times Staff Writer
In print: Friday, August 8, 2008


Social Bookmarking
Digg Facebook Stumbleupon
Reddit Del.icio.us Newsvine
ADVERTISEMENT
A worker of the company that makes the ProVision scanners demonstrates what security screeners will see thanks to the devices. Civil liberties advocates equate the scans to electronic strip searches. Others disagree.
[Getty Images]
A worker of the company that makes the ProVision scanners demonstrates what security screeners will see thanks to the devices. Civil liberties advocates equate the scans to electronic strip searches. Others disagree.

Related Links

Airport security officers might examine an image of everything under your clothes — or nearly everything — in the not-too-distant future.

Tampa International Airport will receive four new whole-body imaging machines from the Transportation Security Administration in the next 30 days. TSA officers should begin scanning travelers for hidden weapons and explosives within the next few months, said John Van Dyke, a spokesman for the agency in Tampa. "Our goal is to be proficient with them before the Super Bowl," in Tampa in February, he said.

Ten airports nationwide are testing the body scans on randomly chosen travelers or those who don't pass an initial screening. One hundred twenty machines, manufactured by L-3 Communications in St. Petersburg under the brand name ProVision, will be deployed in 24 U.S. airports by year end.

TSA officials say the technology is a good alternative to physically patting down travelers. The machine also catches plastic and ceramic weapons that pass through metal detectors.

"Passenger imaging technologies enable TSA to screen quickly and unobtrusively for prohibited items including weapons, explosives and other metallic and nonmetallic objects … without physical contact," said TSA spokeswoman Sari Koshetz.

Civil liberties advocates call the scanners "an electronic strip search" and worry their use will spread to other public venues.

"You don't use the most intrusive equipment as your first line of defense," said Howard Simon, executive director of the American Civil Liberties Union of Florida.

ProVision machines, which sell for $150,000 each, bounce harmless radio frequency signals off travelers standing in a booth as they raise their hands. A TSA officer in another room or a booth examines the image. If a suspicious object appears, the officer calls a colleague to physically search the passenger.

The TSA says its procedures protect people's privacy. Faces are blurred on images. Neither officers looking at the image nor the subjects see each other. Images are deleted after viewing, and officers can't "save, store, print or transmit" them, said TSA spokesman Christopher White.

He describes the images as robotic, like someone in a tight-fitting leotard. "You can see detail, but it's not a naked picture," White said.

Attorney Chris Calabrese with the American Civil Liberties Union in New York disagrees. "It reveals explicit details of people's bodies and medical details like colostomy bags," he said. He doubts the TSA can protect images from those seeking to sell pictures of celebrities or people with odd body shapes.

Those who refuse to go through the scanners must submit to pat-down searches.

One benefit might play well in Florida. It's a way to confirm that travelers who say their artificial hips set off the metal detectors aren't telling a fib, White said.

Steve Huettel can be reached at huettel@sptimes.com or (813) 226-3384.



[Last modified: Aug 13, 2008 08:11 PM]



Comments on this article
by Jill Aug 8, 2008 2:31 PM
OMG people!Didn't you read the whole articule above!Not every single person is going to be scanned.Just people that raise an alarm.TIA is trying to keep it very discrete but all are blowing it out of proportion.Look at what we currently through now.
by mumbles Aug 8, 2008 2:04 PM
It will also catch drug mules who swallow cocaine-filled and heroin-filled balloons
by JEA Aug 8, 2008 1:53 PM
Dear family members of 9/11 victims: This is too obtrusive, not to mention ineffective. The next airline attack will be from a checked bag, not something hidden on a traveller. Use the scanners on luggage.
by Edison Aug 8, 2008 1:53 PM
Two words: Total Recall
by Bob Aug 8, 2008 1:34 PM
Great, now I'll need to 'prepare myself' in case of a scan. 'It's cold in this airport, haven't you heard of shrinkage?!?'.
by Bob Aug 8, 2008 1:34 PM
As said in "Butch Cassidy", "Morons, I've got morons on my team". They want to be ready for the Super Bowl but the screeners are screening pople leaving Tampa, and they will not be checking anyone bringing weapons to Tampa for Super Bowl weekend.
by C Aug 8, 2008 1:34 PM
What if a woman is pregnant? Isn't this a danger to the fetus? And what if a woman is having her period. This is insanity.
by Lynn Aug 8, 2008 1:34 PM
Not to get too personal, but if a woman is wearing a sanitary napkin....it seems that this will show up too and then what? Will the next concern be is the women hiding something? This technique go entirely too far.
by Tim Aug 8, 2008 1:34 PM
For all of you that are complaining about this, there is one simple solution to your concerns....Don't fly!!! Flying a plane is not a right. If you don't want to be scanned for weapons or explosives, get in your car in drive.
by Steve Aug 8, 2008 1:33 PM
Someone tell the family members of victims of 9/11 that this is "too obtrusive". Scan me all you want. Don't fly if you have a problem with it.
by Bill Aug 8, 2008 1:33 PM
Anyone wonder if no one can "save, store, print or transmit" the image, where the sample came from that we are looking at? Hmmmm....
by Heidi Aug 8, 2008 1:33 PM
Other nations for a long time (well before 9//11), have used much more sophisticated NONINTRUSIVE methods to help ID potentially threatening individuals. Watching people's behavior is much more effective & less $$, but requires smarter staff!
by robert Aug 8, 2008 1:33 PM
I'll show mine, if they (tsa/homeland security) show theirs first. What a bunch of BS. Why not let them put on the latex gloves while they are at it. Oh, if they made everyone drink some Barium 1 hr prior to departure, it would be even more effective.
by blame americans Aug 8, 2008 1:33 PM
you have people like CB and MJ, "wah wah wah, save me, protect me, i don't care what it takes" - stop being such crybabies and accept that you're not any safer because of this, but we're all worse off.
by Chester Aug 8, 2008 1:33 PM
I love it. I wish I had a similar machine for personal use. What a crock. You know they are not going to delete these images. One more civil liberty down the drain. Wake up America
by amy Aug 8, 2008 10:21 AM
Remember to wear your pasties everybody!
by tim Aug 8, 2008 10:21 AM
During the political hijackings of the 70's it was best to calmly wait it out. Then with "911" we saw the intent to kill. Today, any passenger who brandishes a weapon will be promptly beaten to a pulp by fellow passengers. The TIA is a big fat waste.
by ENough Aug 8, 2008 10:20 AM
If airlines think they have slumping sales now, wait til this hits them. This is not only invasive, it is humiliating. More BIG BROTHER is watching you. I bet most flyers would rather die than be exposed like this.
by Cathi Aug 8, 2008 10:20 AM
I have two daughters 18 and 9, I refuse to let someone look at either of them like this. This is sick, things have gone too far. I understand safety issues, but this crosses the line.
by Joe Aug 8, 2008 10:20 AM
There is no way to transmit them? No one heard of cell phone cameras? Some have better quality than a digital camera. If I get selected for one, I'm asking for a pat down.
by Eric M Aug 8, 2008 10:19 AM
Every time I hear a (new) aspect of technology applied, it worries me. If someone tried to hijack a jet w/ a pair of nail clippers, I'd die laughing. Take away the target-[The US] and it would slow down.No matter what,if they are determined we lose.
by Eric M Aug 8, 2008 9:49 AM
This sounds like a perverts dream. Just because security is Federal now, it doesn't mean squat. I agree safety is #1; but this type of "Safety" stuff is creeping into our lives a bit too fast. Make an obstacle,and someone will try until they beat it.
by Butch Aug 8, 2008 9:45 AM
There will be a lot of pervs signing up for that detail
by ctb Aug 8, 2008 9:45 AM
Who wants to bet that screeners will eventually be found abusing this technology, getting their jollies looking @ 'nude' victims... er,passengers?
by Arlene Aug 8, 2008 9:45 AM
Give me a break. What an invasion of privacy that is. What's wrong with the wand? I personally have had a lot of radiation with my cancer treatments and would refuse to subject myself to that. I can't believe it isn't harmful in some way.
by Eric Aug 8, 2008 9:45 AM
It's official. The terrorists have won.
by Kay Aug 8, 2008 9:45 AM
I am horrified. This is highly intrusive. As a person who dresses very modestly, I would never agree to this scan. I just don't know if we could tell it was happening for sure. I would prefer a pat-down but I think I'll just avoid flying.
by C B Aug 8, 2008 9:45 AM
Hey..if this technology keeps me safe on an airplane...then scan away. My safety is more important than being worried about people looking at me!
by Jack Aug 8, 2008 9:45 AM
This is outrageous and should NOT be allowed. What is this, Nazi Germany? Our government has gone too far by using terrorism as a catcheall excuse to take our rights. I bet $ that the company that makes the machines contributes heavily to Republicans
by Perry Aug 8, 2008 9:45 AM
You know if we make the process of departure from an airport a 3 or 4 hour process, the potiential terrorists will be bored to death, give up, and go home. Bring on the strip search!
by Mary Aug 8, 2008 9:45 AM
ENOUGH already! Still can't understand why all the security hoops for the passengers but zip on the luggage that goes on the same aircraft? Haven't they figured it out yet that, if a terrorist wanted to blow up a plane,just put it in the checked bag?
by MJ Aug 8, 2008 9:45 AM
Great idea, it's getting scary out there...we need all the protection we can get. Go fo it.
by Melissa Aug 8, 2008 9:44 AM
Looking at the sample scan it is clear that this is an invasion of privacy.
by Devlin Aug 8, 2008 9:44 AM
Who would even want to fly these days ? More B.S. from the feds.
by Jean Aug 8, 2008 9:44 AM
Great, now I have to hit the gym before I go to the airport. :)
Subscribe to the Times
Click here for daily delivery
of the St. Petersburg Times.

Email Newsletters

ADVERTISEMENT

 
ADVERTISEMENT