Make us your home page

Automakers say self-driving cars are on the horizon

Jarrod Snider, the lead engineer of the driverless car project at Carnegie Mellon University, rides in an automated car as it negotiates a road in Pittsburgh. Researchers are contemplating how cities could change if our cars start driving for us, including narrower streets as parking spots could become unnecessary.

New York Times (2012)

Jarrod Snider, the lead engineer of the driverless car project at Carnegie Mellon University, rides in an automated car as it negotiates a road in Pittsburgh. Researchers are contemplating how cities could change if our cars start driving for us, including narrower streets as parking spots could become unnecessary.

It has been a futurist fever dream since at least 1939, when visitors to the General Motors pavilion at the New York World's Fair marveled at a glimpse of the automotive future: a miniaturized model of a city prowled by 50,000 robot cars, controlled not by drivers but by centralized radio waves.

That future may have been delayed a bit (the GM pavilion boldly predicted that people would be out from behind the steering wheel by 1960), but it's no longer pulpish science fiction: Several car companies say they'll begin selling vehicles that can drive themselves — at least part of the time — by the end of this decade. And Florida will be ground zero of the automotive revolution.

"We want to be the state that's ready for innovation," says Ananth Prasad, Florida's transportation secretary. "We want to be the state where entrepreneurs and great minds can come to try things, rather than the state that just says no."

One of just four states that permit experimental driverless vehicles to be driven on public roads, Florida has been the site of tests to see how their crash-averting sensors react to sudden and vicious thunderstorms. A section of Interstate 4 between Orlando and Tampa already has been equipped with transponders that feed the cars information about traffic and road conditions.

And when auto manufacturers and government officials from across the country held a summit last year to work out some of the legal and technological issues surrounding the vehicles, they chose Tampa to host it.

During a car show accompanying the summit, Prasad took one of the prototypes out for a spin. Or, maybe, it took him.

"It felt a little odd, sitting there with my hands away from the wheel, on an interstate with people going by me at 70 miles an hour," he recalls. "But it wasn't scary or intimidating. Of course, obviously I was in a car full of Google engineers if anything went wrong."

Google, the Internet company that has been testing Priuses and Lexuses festooned with radar, lasers and video cameras that allow the vehicles to be driven by their software rather than humans, says it expects its "autonomous driving system" to be on the road by 2018.

Several car manufacturers are only slightly less optimistic. Nissan, Mercedes-Benz and Renault all have announced plans to market cars in 2020 that can drive themselves at least part of the time.

"A lot of people question whether we're going to see this in our lifetime," Prasad says. "I think they're going to be very, very surprised. … Autonomous vehicles are much, much closer than we think."

In fact, they're already here — kind of. Several of the key technologies in creating a full-blown driverless car already have been deployed. Some Mercedes models sold in Europe can be put on autopilot in low-speed traffic jams; taking cues from the vehicles ahead of them, they stop or go, speed up or slow down as traffic permits, while keeping themselves inside the lane.

Volvo equips some cars with a pedestrian-protection system that hits the brakes hard if the car's radar spots a person in the street ahead.

• • •

Surely, many of the 31,000 Americans who die in traffic accidents each year would be saved if drivers and their unfortunate tendencies to drink beer, send texts, apply makeup and race trains were taken out from behind the wheel — not to mention the elimination of things like fog-bound pileups and collisions due to rearview mirror blind spots.

"That death toll — it's like having an airliner crash every day of the year," says Paul Feenstra, senior vice president of the Intelligent Transportation Society of America. "If that were to happen, we'd have congressional hearings every day to get to the bottom of it. But it's become an acceptable norm on the nation's highways, and it doesn't have to be."

The quixotic dreams of urban planners for vast tracts of parkland and bike paths and playgrounds might become affordable if cities could get rid of all their parking lots. And, maybe, they could.

"You probably don't need parking garages anymore once you have driverless cars," says Chandra Bhat, director of the Center for Transportation Research at the University of Texas. "You'd just call an autonomous taxi to pick you up in the morning and return you in the afternoon. Somewhere from 20 to 80 percent of urban land area could be repurposed."

Some theorists think the entire foundation of private car ownership will be shattered. "There's a lot of talk about people joining fleets or clubs, like Netflix for cars, where you'd just order one up when you needed it," says Loren Smith, an analyst who follows government automotive policy for the research firm Capital Alpha. "You wouldn't have a car sitting in the driveway for 23 hours a day, doing nothing."

The productivity of American workers would soar as commute times shrink — traffic jams would be a thing of the past as computers mass driverless cars into perfectly spaced convoys traveling at uniform speeds — and workers can spend the time working on their laptops instead of trying to cut in front of the guy in the next lane.

• • •

Google thrilled the industry a couple of years ago with a video of a blind man in the driver's seat of one of its automated cars as it carried him first to a fast-food restaurant and then to pick up his dry cleaning. Driverless cars promise new independence to disabled people and — not inconsequential in a country where the massive baby boom generation is passing into retirement — senior citizens whose driving skills have waned.

Whatever its potential benefits, the road to a driverless car horizon is filled with legal, political and social potholes.

One of the biggest: liability law. No matter how good the technology is, there are going to be accidents, especially with a mix of human drivers and robots, which will be the situation for decades as the new cars penetrate the market. It can be something as simple as a tire blowout or as complicated as a power surge that knocks out some of the technology while the driver is asleep and can't take over. Lawyers and insurance companies will be watching carefully and looking at the question of who is responsible.

Technology failures might not be just legally complicated, but terrifying: What if a virus or a hacker invaded the software of vehicles and sent them reeling out of control? What if terrorists start using driverless cars to deliver suicide bombs that don't require suicides?

• • •

Infrastructure is another problem that may take years to overcome. No one has even ventured a guess as to how much it will cost to embed America's 8 million lane-miles of roads with the network of transponders and sensors necessary to relay road and weather conditions to vehicles.

Privacy issues associated with driverless cars may prove nettlesome. The technology in a driverless car will record exactly where it has been and when, information that the owner might not want to have available to a nosy government agency or a truculent divorce lawyer.

Then there are potential corporate commercial clashes with privacy, too. What if Google, which knows you have a weakness for Big Macs because of information it has collected from your Web browsing, strikes a deal and instead of mapping your driverless car on the shortest route to the office sends it to one that takes it past a McDonald's?

"The privacy people are going to go crazy when they figure out all the implications of this stuff," predicts Robert Poole, editor of the industry newsletter Surface Transportation Innovations. "It's massive data collection, the GPS big-brother box in the car."

Poole, though a fervent supporter of driverless-car technology, thinks there's "a lot of mindless optimism" among its backers. He thinks its adoption will take much longer than anyone expects, and fall considerably short of the complete overhaul of society that they hope for.

"You just aren't going to see blind people traveling alone in these cars on freeways, or traffic jams disappear, or cities completely re-engineer themselves," he says. "As strong a technology as it is, things break and stuff goes wrong, and there will always have to be a human driver sitting there, ready to take control."

Three upcoming key moments

Any day now: The U.S. Department of Transportation will announce the results of a $25 million field test that began in Ann Arbor, Mich., in 2012. About 3,000 vehicles were equipped with sensors and wireless communications devices to determine whether they could successfully pass warnings about potential collisions to one another. The preliminary indications are good: The state of Michigan has decided to take over the pilot program and expand it to 30,000 vehicles.

Late 2014: The National Telecommunications and Information Administration, the federal office that advises the White House on telecommunications policy, is expected to come up with important recommendations about the part of the broadband spectrum set aside for driverless cars. Cable companies and other big broadband consumers want the spectrum to be shared with smartphones and other commercial devices; car companies are worried the smartphones will interfere with the new collision-avoidance systems on their vehicles. The NTIA's preliminary announcements have seemed favorable to the automakers.

Late 2016: The Obama administration says it will issue proposed rules establishing a common standard for vehicle-to-vehicle communications and a timetable for their installation in new vehicles. Vehicle-to-vehicle communications are the cornerstone technology of driverless cars, allowing them to warn one another of impending collisions, and a single standard will ensure that all vehicles can talk to one another. Once the rules are proposed, there will be a period of at least three months for public comment and debate, which could be a real turning point for smart cars.

Potential roadblocks

Liability law: America has more than a century of laws and judicial precedents on the books for who's responsible for damages in a traffic accident. That all goes out the window when cars are driving themselves, probably way out the window if a human driver and a robot car collide. The plaintiffs' bar, the trial lawyers who represent accident victims, is legendarily combative over changes in liability law. And insurance companies will certainly have an opinion or two.

Broadband spectrum: Cable companies, one of the wealthiest and most powerful lobbies in Washington, are hungrily eyeing the part of the broadband spectrum set aside for driverless cars. The cable companies say their customers' smartphones can safely share that spectrum with the cars; and besides, driverless cars are years in the future and smartphones are here now. Car manufacturers say driver safety should trump the ability of Starbucks customers to stream Bachelor Party 2 on their smartphones. If this dispute can't be resolved amicably, or at least definitively, it will be devastating for driverless cars.

Infrastructure: Just for starters, there are about 8 million miles of traffic lanes in the United States and about 300,000 traffic lights. Then there are stop signs, bridges that ice up, low-lying roads that flood in heavy rain — the list goes on and on. For cars to be truly driverless, they've all got to be equipped with sensors and transponders (and the lanes fully mapped). Even when driverless cars start to roll off the assembly lines, it will be decades — if ever — before they really fulfill their utopian promise.

Automakers say self-driving cars are on the horizon 03/21/14 [Last modified: Friday, March 21, 2014 6:47pm]
Photo reprints | Article reprints

© 2017 Tampa Bay Times


Join the discussion: Click to view comments, add yours

  1. Founder of Tampa home sharing platform questions Airbnb, NAACP partnership


    TAMPA — A Tampa rival to Airbnb, which was launched because of discrimination complaints on the dominant home sharing platform, has concerns about the new partnership between Airbnb and NAACP announced this week.

    Rohan Gilkes poses for a portrait at his home and business headquarters in Tampa. 

Innclusive, a Tampa-based start-up, is a home-sharing platform that focuses on providing a positive traveling experience for minorities. [CHARLIE KAIJO | Times]
  2. Appointments at Port Tampa Bay and Tampa General Medical Group highlight this week's Tampa Bay business Movers & Shakers



    Port Tampa Bay announced that Jamal Sowell has been named director of special projects. Sowell, a former member of the U.S.Marine Corps, will support internal, external and special projects, assist the executive team with management oversight and serve as a liaison on a variety of port …

    Port Tampa Bay announced this week that Jamal Sowell has been named director of special projects. [Handout photo]
  3. Drones restrictions coming at Tampa Bay area airports


    Starting Sept. 1, Tampa International Airport officials will be enforcing new height restrictions for drones and other unmanned aircraft systems, according to a press release.

    In this February 2017 file photo, a drone flies in Hanworth Park in west London. Starting Sept. 1, Tampa International Airport officials will be enforcing new height restrictions for drones and other unmanned aircraft systems,
[John Stillwell/PA via AP, File]
  4. Gov. Scott backs off boycott of companies doing business in Venezuela

    State Roundup

    TALLAHASSEE — Gov. Rick Scott will ask the Florida Cabinet next month to prohibit the state's investment managers from doing something they already do not do: invest in companies or securities owned or controlled by the Venezuelan government.

    Florida Governor Rick Scott interacts with people as he holds a Venezuelan Freedom Rally at El Arepazo 2 restaurant on July 10 in Miami. [Joe Raedle | Getty Images]
  5. Superior Uniform Group reports $65.6 million in sales for second quarter


    SEMINOLE — Superior Uniform Group Inc. reported sales of $65.6 million in net sales for the second quarter, up a percentage point from the same quarter last year, the Seminole-based company reported Thursday.

    Superior Uniform Group Inc. saw a sales increase for the second quarter, the company reported Thursday. Pictured is Michael Benstock, CEO. | [Courtesy of Superior Uniform Group]