Make us your home page
Instagram

Youngest in work force have different view of when, where work should be done

I marvel at young reporters who turn stories in on deadline while sipping a cappuccino in Starbucks. The concept of working from anywhere at any time is second nature, something they never even question. It's an option my generation never had when we came on the work scene, when laptops, WiFi and compassionate bosses were scarce. • Now, here we are, the 30- and 40-year-olds who make up Generation X, managing the 20-somethings as their supervisors and mentors and trying to figure out why they have such a different attitude about work and what to do about it. Most of us haven't really thought about the important role we play in molding this new generation of workers.

I wrote recently about how the recession has been a giant slice of humble pie for younger workers, turning bold and brash Generation Y into Generation Comply.

From their first entry into the workplace a few years ago, Gen Y has bumped up against corporate cultures steeped in the chained-to-your-desk mentality. Nationally, advocacy groups are putting up a good fight to coax workplaces to be more accommodating about where and when work gets done. The White House even launched its own push for flexibility. But Gen Y consistently says their biggest obstacle is managers who can't let go of the need to exercise authority over employees — in person.

Jaret Davis, a 35-year-old partner at the law firm Greenberg Traurig, considers himself "a bridge between two extremes." He's smack in the middle of the younger lawyers who want flexibility and work-life balance and the older lawyers in top management who want to preserve a corporate culture where tradition and face time is valued.

"The Gen Y perspective is not foreign to my generation," Davis said. "We came with the mind-set to work hard, do what it takes, but we're open to Gen Y who looks at it as, 'How can I work hard and master my craft while not sacrificing my life?' "

Davis says he's working with young lawyers at his firm to figure out how to tap into innovations that would give millennials flexibility and still get the work done.

A few months ago, while working on a Father's Day column, I learned that new fathers who work in corporate America are using informal flexibility at work, rather than the formal flexibility many mothers use. They said their immediate managers (Gen Xers) as opposed to top executives (boomers and matures), were from dual-career households, too, and were quite supportive of the work-life challenges they face. That was the first time I saw my generation as a bridge.

Like Davis, Karen Gilmartin, a Miami Lakes workers' compensation lawyer, understands her role in modernizing the workplace.

The young lawyers need Gen Xers to teach them that they can have success but they have to earn it, she said. Gilmartin, 49, leads by example, showing her young female associates that it's possible to be a respected law partner and a mom. "I'm here at 7 a.m., but I might cut out early to go to my child's hockey game," she says.

Clearly, we were the pioneers who suffered the perils of flex time and allowed personal schedules to take us off our career paths. But maybe as pioneers we can help the next generation build on our experience and figure out how to do it even better, how to use a flexible work arrangement without it taking someone off the path to the top.

Behind the millennials come an even different bunch, already being referred to as the iGeneration. As a mother of a 13- and 14-year-old, I see how different they are from the 20-somethings. This generation would rather text than talk. They want to be constantly connected, available and multitasking in a way even the millennials don't quite get. They don't remember a time without the constant connectivity to the world via sophisticated handheld devices. In a decade, when they enter the workplace, I bet they won't be able to fathom why they can't split early to go to a baseball game when clearly they can handle any client need from their smart phones.

It's telling that even in this time of high unemployment, millennials don't feel compelled to take any old job offered to them. According to an annual survey by the National Association of Colleges and Employers, 41 percent of college grads who were offered jobs turned them down and 57 percent believe another, better job opportunity will come up in just a few months.

Meanwhile, they are comfortable with economic uncertainty and content to live with their parents and hold out for that perfect opportunity or start their own businesses on a shoestring. "They are still searching for what is purposeful," says Tamara Bell, founder and editor in chief of Y Gen Out Loud, an online news organization.

Gen Y is telling us they are not going to put up with unappreciative workplaces and arrogant bosses, particularly after the economy recovers. I see my generation as smart enough to realize that companies need young workers to keep them relevant in the digital age. We need their perspective, energy and know-how. We are the current and future bosses who will try to hang on to Gen Y workers, incorporate their ideas and work styles and make sure they advance. From my view, we're up to the task.

Cindy Krischer Goodman is CEO of BalanceGal LLC, a provider of news and advice on how to balance work and life. She can be reached at balancegalgmail.com.

Youngest in work force have different view of when, where work should be done 09/11/10 [Last modified: Saturday, September 11, 2010 4:30am]
Photo reprints | Article reprints

Copyright: For copyright information, please check with the distributor of this item, Tribune News Service.
    

Join the discussion: Click to view comments, add yours

Loading...
  1. For Gov. Rick Scott, 'fighting' could mean vetoing entire state budget

    State Roundup

    Every day, Gov. Rick Scott is getting a lot of advice.

    The last time a Florida governor vetoed the education portion of the state budget was in 1983. Gov. Bob Graham blasted fellow Democrats for their “willing acceptance of mediocrity.”
  2. Potential new laws further curb Floridians' right to government in the Sunshine

    State Roundup

    TALLAHASSEE — From temporarily shielding the identities of murder witnesses to permanently sealing millions of criminal and arrest records, state lawmakers did more this spring than they have in all but one of the past 22 years to chip away at Floridians' constitutional guarantees to access government records and …

    The Legislature passed 17 new exemptions to the Sunshine Law, according to a tally by the First Amendment Foundation.
  3. Data breach exposes 469 Social Security numbers, thousands of concealed weapons holders

    Corporate

    Social Security numbers for up to 469 people and information about thousands of concealed weapons holders were exposed in a data breach at Florida the Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services. The breach, which the agency believes happened about two weeks ago, occurred in an online payments system, spokesperson …

    Commissioner of Agriculture Adam Putnam on Monday that nearly 500 people may have had their Social Security numbers obtained in a data breach in his office.
[Times file photo]

  4. Trigaux: Can Duke Energy Florida's new chief grow a business when customers use less power?

    Energy

    Let's hope Harry Sideris has a bit of Harry Houdini in him.

    Duke Energy Florida president Harry Sideris laid out his prioriities for the power company ranging from improved customer service to the use of more large-scale solar farms to provide electricity. And he acknowledged a critical challenge: People are using less electricity these days. [SCOTT KEELER   |   Times]
  5. Citigroup agrees to pay nearly $100 million fine for Mexican subsidiary

    Banking

    NEW YORK — Citigroup has agreed to pay nearly $100 million to federal authorities to settle claims that a lack of internal controls and negligence in the bank's Mexican subsidiary may have allowed customers to commit money laundering.

    Citigroup has agreed to pay nearly $100 million to federal authorities to settle claims that a lack of internal controls and negligence in the bank's Mexican subsidiary may have allowed customers to commit money laundering. 
[Associated Press file photo]