Make us your home page
Instagram

Senate panel examines flood insurance rate increases

A rush to stave off huge flood insurance rate hikes comes to a head at a Senate hearing in Washington, D.C., today.

Testimony is expected to focus on "unintended consequences" of the Biggert-Waters Flood Insurance Reform Act, a 2012 law enacted to keep the National Flood Insurance Program solvent by phasing out lower, subsidized rates for older properties in flood zones.

But with just two weeks before the harsher provisions in Biggert-Waters take effect, time is running out, especially for home­owners like Penny Lee.

Lee bought a house in St. Pete Beach in September 2012. She had never heard of Biggert-Waters. Neither her real estate agent nor mortgage company told her that recent buyers of homes subsidized with lower flood insurance rates would immediately lose their subsidy when they renew their policies after Oct. 1.

She found out what it meant when she talked to her insurance agent a week ago, on her birthday: Her flood insurance premium ballooned from $1,339 to $8,859.

"That was my birthday present," Lee said. "I'm hit just because I happened to buy a house last year. … This is more than my house payment. It just blows your mind."

Her home — like many affected by the spike in flood rates — is modest: a two-bedroom, cinder-block, one-story cottage that's not on the water.

Lee moved from Atlanta to St. Petersburg with visions of retiring here. She made a big down payment, buying a $200,000 home thinking that would keep her monthly mortgage manageable.

The flood insurance crisis blew "manageable" out the window. If her bank pays the higher flood premium next month — and recoups the funds from her over the next 12 months — her monthly house payment would jump from $977 to more than $1,700. That's after she raised her deductible and cut as much of her content coverage as possible to whittle her flood payment down to $7,149.

Lee feels luckier than many. She has some savings, and she knows other homeowners are facing even sharper rate hikes.

Following recent media coverage, several politicians representing Central Florida have taken up the cause. U.S. Reps. Kathy Castor, C.W. "Bill" Young, Gus Bilirakis and Rich Nugent, along with Sen. Bill Nelson, are among those urging at least a delay in implementing some of the rate increases.

Penny Lee stands in front of her modest St. Pete Beach home on Tuesday. Lee bought her home in 2012, the year Congress passed a law that will raise her flood insurance from $1,339 to $8,859.

CHRIS ZUPPA | Times

Penny Lee stands in front of her modest St. Pete Beach home on Tuesday. Lee bought her home in 2012, the year Congress passed a law that will raise her flood insurance from $1,339 to $8,859.

Rate hike deluge

Barring any congressional action, here are parts of the Biggert-Waters Flood Insurance Reform Act going into effect Oct. 1:

• Owners of homes in flood zones that were subsidized with lower rates could face an annual rate increase of 16 to 17 percent, plus a 5 percent fee going toward a new flood insurance reserve fund.

• Anyone who bought a subsidized home after July 6, 2012, loses the subsidy upon the next renewal.

• Owners of businesses with subsidized policies and those property owners with severe repetitive losses will see rates rising 25 percent a year until their premiums reflect true market risk.

Senate panel examines flood insurance rate increases 09/17/13 [Last modified: Tuesday, September 17, 2013 10:23pm]
Photo reprints | Article reprints

© 2017 Tampa Bay Times

    

Join the discussion: Click to view comments, add yours

Loading...
  1. Massachusetts firm buys Tampa's Element apartment tower

    Real Estate

    TAMPA — Downtown Tampa's Element apartment tower sold this week to a Massachusetts-based real estate investment company that plans to upgrade the skyscraper's amenities and operate it long-term as a rental community.

    The Element apartment high-rise at 808 N Franklin St. in downtown Tampa has been sold to a Northland Investment Corp., a Massachusetts-based real estate investment company. JIM DAMASKE  |  Times
  2. New York town approves Legoland proposal

    News

    GOSHEN, N.Y. — New York is one step closer to a Lego dreamland. Goshen, a small town about fifty miles northwest of the Big Apple, has approved the site plan for a $500 million Legoland amusement park.

    A small New York town, Goshen approved the site plan for a $500 million Legoland amusement park. Legoland Florida is in Winter Haven. [Times file  photo]
  3. Jordan Park to get $20 million makeover and new senior housing

    Real Estate

    By WAVENEY ANN MOORE

    Times Staff Writer

    ST. PETERSBURG —The St. Petersburg Housing Authority, which bought back the troubled Jordan Park public housing complex this year, plans to spend about $20 million to improve the 237-unit property and construct a new three-story building for …

    Jordan Park, the historic public housing complex, is back in the hands of the St. Petersburg Housing Authority. The agency is working to improve the 237-unit complex. But the latest plan to build a new three-story building for seniors will mean 31 families have to find new homes. [LARA CERRI   |   Tampa Bay Times]
  4. Coming soon at two Tampa Bay area hospitals: a cancer treatment that could replace chemo

    Health

    A new cancer treatment that could eventually replace chemotherapy and bone marrow transplants — along with their debilitating side effects — soon will be offered at two of Tampa Bay's top-tier hospitals.

    Dr. Frederick Locke at Moffitt Cancer Center in Tampa is a principal investigator for an experimental therapy that retrains white blood cells in the body's immune system to fight cancer cells. The U.S. Food and Drug Administration approved these so-called "CAR-T" treatments for adults this month. In trials, 82 percent of cases responded well to the treatment, and 44 percent are still in remission at least eight months later, Locke said. [CHRIS URSO   |   Times]
  5. Regulator blasts Wells Fargo for deceptive auto insurance program

    Banking

    Wells Fargo engaged in unfair and deceptive practices, failed to properly manage risks and hasn't set aside enough money to pay back the customers it harmed, according to a confidential report by federal regulators.

    Wells Fargo engaged in unfair and deceptive practices, failed to properly manage risks and hasn't set aside enough money to pay back the customers it harmed, according to a confidential report by federal regulators.
[Photo by Spencer Platt/Getty Images, 2017]