Make us your home page

Teeth removed in reworked financial reform bill

WASHINGTON — OMG! I'm turning into Mitch McConnell! :(

Wading through the 1,336-page "chairman's mark" of the Senate's financial regulatory reform bill, my initial reaction was the same as the Senate Republican leader's response to any Democratic initiative: put this sucker aside and start over.

Don't get me wrong — I'm all for clever compromise, but this one looks like the proverbial camel concocted by a committee that set out to design a horse.

When Banking Committee Chairman Chris Dodd, D-Conn., unveiled his first draft last year, it was noteworthy for its elegant policy design, its intellectual integrity, its determination to build a robust new regulatory architecture from the ground up, no matter whose toes were stepped on.

Dodd 2.0, by contrast, reads like the chairman and his Senate colleagues couldn't make up their minds about who or what caused the financial crisis or who could be trusted to fix the system. They've come up with a set of jury-rigged patches designed to placate as many interest groups as possible while preserving the existing regulatory apparatus and prerogatives.

Certainly, the strangest compromise in the latest draft was the creation of a consumer protection agency for financial products within the Fed, which until the crisis had a record in the consumer area unblemished by success. This was supposed to be a clever accommodation to industry types who warned of the end of finance as we know it if consumer protection were transferred to a single-minded new agency. But on closer inspection, housing it at the Fed was just a political ruse. Under Dodd 2.0, the Fed's governors cannot appoint or remove the agency's director, intervene in any enforcement action, review any of the agency's reports or reject any of its proposed regulations.

Surely the strongest section of the latest Senate bill is the one, crafted by Mark Warner, D-Va., and Bob Corker, R-Tenn., that would bury the idea that there are banks that are too big to fail and therefore must be bailed out when they get in trouble.

Under this proposal, any big bank facing possible insolvency could be taken over and forced into an orderly, government-supervised liquidation, with shareholders and managers losing everything and unsecured creditors forced to accept losses. But even that section reflects distaste with recent bailouts given its arcane, convoluted process for deciding whether to pull the plug, one that involves the Fed, the systemic risk council, a panel of bankruptcy judges in Delaware, the treasury secretary and expedited legal appeals all the way to the Supreme Court.

Call it checks and balances on steroids.

Still to come is the bipartisan provision requiring that credit-default swaps and other derivatives be traded on regulated exchanges or processed through regulated clearing houses. It's already clear, however, that there will be so many exceptions for "customized" contracts and companies using such instruments to hedge business risks that it's only a matter of time before trading-desk wise guys figure out how to subvert the new rule.

And that's the problem with Dodd 2.0. There are so many political accommodations involving carve-outs and size limits and overlapping responsibilities that it creates exactly the kind of complexity, the opportunities for regulatory arbitrage and the lack of accountability that got us into this mess in the first place.

Financial regulation works best when the rules and structures are simple and straightforward and regulators are invested with discretion for achieving broadly stated goals.

Teeth removed in reworked financial reform bill 03/21/10 [Last modified: Sunday, March 21, 2010 4:30am]
Photo reprints | Article reprints

© 2017 Tampa Bay Times


Join the discussion: Click to view comments, add yours

  1. 'Toxic' times: How repeal of Florida's tax on services reverberates, 30 years later

    State Roundup

    TALLAHASSEE — Long before Hurricane Irma attacked Florida, the state faced a troubled fiscal future that the storm will only make worse.

    Robertson says the tax debate is now “toxic.”
  2. Fewer Tampa Bay homeowners are underwater on their mortgages

    Real Estate

    The percentage of Tampa Bay homeowners underwater on their mortgages continues to drop. In the second quarter of this year, 10.2 percent of borrowers had negative equity compared to nearly 15 percent in the same period a year ago, CoreLogic reported Thursday. Nationally, 5.4 percent of all mortgaged homes were …

    The percentage of Tampa Bay homeowners underwater on their mortgages  continues to drop. [Times file photo]
  3. 'What Happened'? Clinton memoir sold 300,000 copies in first week


    Despite being met with decidedly mixed reviews, What Happened, Hillary Clinton's new memoir about the 2016 presidential campaign, sold a whopping 300,000 copies in its first week.

    The new memoir by former presidential candidate Hillary Clinton sold 300,000 copies in its first week.
  4. After Irma topples tree, home sale may be gone with the wind

    Real Estate

    ST. PETERSBURG — To house hunters searching online, the home for sale in St. Petersburg's Shore Acres neighborhood couldn't have looked more appealing — fully renovated and shaded by the leafy canopy of a magnificent ficus benjamini tree.

    Hurricane Irma's winds recently blew over a large ficus tree, left, in the yard of a home at 3601Alabama Ave NE, right, in Shore Acres which is owned by Brett Schroder who is trying to sell the house.
[SCOTT KEELER   |   Times]

  5. Unemployment claims double in Florida after Hurricane Irma


    The number of Americans seeking unemployment benefits dropped by 23,000 last week to 259,000 as the economic impact of Hurricane Harvey began to fade.

    Homes destroyed by Hurricane Irma on Big Pine Key last week. Hurricane Irma continued to have an impact on the job market in Florida, where unemployment claims more than doubled from the previous week.
[The New York Times file photo]