Make us your home page
Instagram

Economic solutions won't come without finesse, compromise

WASHINGTON — If you step back and look at the big economic policy issues — health care, financial regulation, immigration, education reform, the budget deficit — they appear to boil down to one question: What is the best tradeoff between fairness, stability and social cohesion on one hand and disruptive and growth-inducing innovation on the other?

At its simplest level, this debate comes down to a choice between big and small government, between regulation and deregulation, between European-style socialism and American free-market capitalism.

Jim Manzi provides a perceptive analysis of these trade­offs in the latest issue of National Affairs, a new conservative journal. Best known as a corporate executive and high-tech investor, Manzi began his career in a newsroom.

"We are between a rock and a hard place," he writes. "If we reverse the market-based reforms that have allowed us to prosper, we will cede global economic share; but if we let inequality and its underlying causes grow unchecked, we will hollow out the middle class — threatening social cohesion, and eventually surrendering our international position anyway. This, and not some 'world-is-flat' happy talk, is what the challenge of globalization means for America."

Manzi is concerned that the pendulum is about to swing back too far, that the United States is on the verge of turning itself into France. But the debate, it seems to me, needs to go beyond simply determining where the pendulum should come to rest. Equally important is how effective the two sectors are in delivering all that social justice and growth-inducing innovation.

When investors engage in herd behavior and deploy scarce capital merely to bid up the price of assets, that does nothing to improve economic output or efficiency.

What good is competition if it drives corporate executives to knowingly engage in increasingly risky behavior?

What good is innovation that is used to snooker consumers, mislead investors or subvert sensible regulation?

The question is not simply whether innovation will be "stifled," as the business community likes to suggest, but whether those innovations serve a larger social purpose.

But just because markets have recently failed us does not excuse a free pass to those who argue for tougher regulation or bigger government.

History is replete with examples of well-intentioned regulation that turned out to be easily evaded or resulted in unintended and unwanted consequences. And too much of what passes for vital public expenditure turns out to be nothing more than special interest rent-seeking and economy-distorting subsidies.

And while it is now beyond dispute that labor markets are generating incomes that are increasingly unequal, governments have found it difficult to come up with cost-effective programs that offset those effects.

"An America that wants to keep its global edge cannot neglect the necessity of innovation and growth, any more than it can ignore the necessity of social cohesion and stability," Manzi concludes. The political challenge for the next decade is to strike the proper balance while perfecting the public and private institutions that can deliver on those promises.

Economic solutions won't come without finesse, compromise 01/03/10 [Last modified: Monday, January 4, 2010 7:27am]
Photo reprints | Article reprints

© 2017 Tampa Bay Times

    

Join the discussion: Click to view comments, add yours

Loading...
  1. Macy's chairman replaces ex-HSN head Grossman on National Retail Federation board

    Retail

    Terry Lundgren, chairman of Macy's Inc., will replace Weight Watchers CEO Mindy Grossman as chair of the National Retail Federation, the organization announced Wednesday. Grossman stepped down from her position following her move from leading St. Petersburg-based HSN to Weight Watchers.

    Weight Watchers CEO and former HSN chief Mindy Grossman is being replaced as chair of the National Retail Federation. [HSN Inc.]
  2. Unexpected weak quarter at MarineMax slashes boating retailer shares nearly 25 percent

    Business

    CLEARWATER — Just then you thought it was safe to go back into the water, a boating business leader issued a small craft warning.

    Bill McGill Jr., CEO of Clearwater's MarineMax, the country's biggest recreational boat retailer. [Courtesy of MarineMax]
  3. CapTrust moving headquarters to downtown Park Tower

    Corporate

    TAMPA — CAPTRUST Advisors, a Raleigh, N.C.-based investment consulting firm, is moving its Tampa offices into Park Tower. CapTrust's new space will be 10,500 square feet — the entirety of the 18th floor of the downtown building, which is scheduled to undergo a multi-million-dollar renovation by 2018.

    CAPTRUST Advisors' Tampa location is moving into Park Tower. Pictured is the current CapTrust location at 102 W. Whiting St. | [Times file photo]
  4. Good news: Tampa Bay no longer a major foreclosure capital of the country

    Real Estate

    Once in the top five nationally for foreclosure filings, the Tampa Bay area no longer makes even the top 25.

    A few short years ago, Tampa Bay was a national hub for foreclosures. Not any more. [Getty Images/iStockphoto]
  5. Tampa-based start-up takes on Airbnb by promoting inclusion, diversity

    Tourism

    NEW TAMPA — Last May, Rohan Gilkes attempted to book a property in Idaho on the home-sharing platform Airbnb. After two failed attempts, the African-American entrepreneur asked a white friend to try, and she was "instantly" approved for the same property and dates.

    Rohan Gilkes poses for a portrait at his home and business headquarters in Tampa. 

Innclusive, a Tampa-based start-up, is a home-sharing platform that focuses on providing a positive traveling experience for minorities. Rohan Gilkes, the founder, said he created the organization after several negative experiences with Airbnb.
[CHARLIE KAIJO   |   Times]