The surrogate
It begins with a woman who yearns for a baby and another who is willing and able to give her one. You can imagine the motives of the prospective parents. But what about the woman willing to carry a baby, give birth and then walk away?
Friday Night Rewind It doesn't matter which team you cheer for. We've got video previews of every high school football program in Hillsborough, Pinellas, Pasco and Hernando County.
Florida Power & Light on Tuesday won state approval to build the state's first new nuclear plants in more than two decades.
The unanimous decision from the Florida Public Service Commission paved the way for the utility to build two new nuclear plants at its Turkey Point power station, 25 miles south of Miami. It also signaled the state's unwavering support for new nuclear power, despite cost estimates that have tripled in little more than a year.
The project could cost $12-billion to $24-billion, depending on the type of reactor FPL selects. It would be among the largest investments ever undertaken by the nation's electric industry, and perhaps the most expensive construction project ever built in Florida.
"This is a critical first step toward securing Florida's future with additional energy that is safe, reliable, cost-efficient and clean," FPL president Armando Olivera said.
The decision Tuesday is good news for St. Petersburg-based Progress Energy Florida. The utility last week asked the commission for approval to build two new reactors in Levy County, several miles north of its Crystal River power station. Hearings on its case are slated to start in May.
Progress Energy estimated the cost at $17-billion, although it insisted that the estimate is "non-binding" and could go much higher. The cost has tripled since the utility announced its plans in late 2006.
Despite the rising cost, nuclear could prove to be cheaper in the long run, especially if natural gas prices continue to rise and if utilities are forced to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, the state's PSC emphasized. Florida also needs to diversify its fuel supply, reduce greenhouse gas emissions, and ensure reliable power for its growing population.
Asjylyn Loder can be reached at aloder@sptimes.com or (813) 225-3117.
[Last modified: Mar 21, 2008 10:57 AM]
Comments on this article
by Steve
Mar 21, 2008 10:57 AM
Bad things can and do happen, even if you forget about Three Mile Island and Chenoble.Remember that no insurance company or the operators of the plant will accept the liability of an accident. So the tax payers have to underwrite the liability.
by beth
Mar 21, 2008 10:53 AM
progress energy,told us they would buy our homes not at value..tax market value, neighbors 80-93 yrs old...cant by homes for 85000.00 since they built in 80's. where are they putting them....out on the streets...said emiment domain..this is
by ra
Mar 20, 2008 6:05 PM
Good!!!
by George Waring
Mar 20, 2008 3:39 PM
No Scott, over the winter "Global Warming" became "Global Climate Change"
they have to cover thier bases.
by kabiru Musa Yauri
Mar 20, 2008 1:00 PM
Whatever the intention,hope it is strictly for peaceful purposes.
by Steve
Mar 20, 2008 12:53 PM
I don't think it will ever by built. By the time they break ground it will be $34 billion, and just not make sense. Nuclear only worked back in the 60's when nobody cared about spent fuel or the environment.
by Sean
Mar 20, 2008 9:58 AM
Nuclear is the best answer at this point. This is great news!
by Pam
Mar 19, 2008 9:33 PM
We are like lemmings for the cliff. Dumber than ants. Our arrogance will precede us when future life (hopefully) on earth pieces together how we nuked ourselves alive.
by Dale Owens
Mar 19, 2008 9:58 AM
Our lungs thank you, FPL. We don't need another "clean" coal plant in the Sunshine State.
by Al
Mar 19, 2008 9:58 AM
That's great and I'm behind Nuclear 100%, but I think China's building a new coal plant every month. They'll soon be the leaders in CO2 emissions. Then we'll be back in the same boat.
by Scott
Mar 19, 2008 9:58 AM
What happened to the ?No Nukes!? crowd? Oh yeah, they?re the ones crying about ?Global Warming? now.
Subscribe to the Times
Click here for daily delivery
of the St. Petersburg Times.