Detours: a country in search of direction
On the eve of the election, a reporter and photographer set out for Washington, via America. We tell stories from seven towns, touching on seven issues from politics and real life.
Friday Night Rewind It doesn't matter which team you cheer for. We've got video previews of every high school football program in Hillsborough, Pinellas, Pasco and Hernando County.
TALLAHASSEE — Progress Energy's $17-billion nuclear project won unanimous approval Tuesday from state regulators, paving the way for the utility to start charging customers for the plant as early as January.
The decision puts Florida on the forefront of the U.S. "nuclear renaissance," with two of the nation's 23 planned nuclear projects slated for the Sunshine State. Both have now won unanimous approval, a development that would have been next to impossible 30 years ago when multibillion-dollar boondoggles and the Three Mile Island accident brought the nuclear boom to a screeching halt.
The Levy County nuclear plant will be among the most expensive construction projects ever undertaken in Florida. If completed on schedule in 2016, it will be the first nuclear power plant brought online in the state in more than 30 years. Another big utility, Florida Power & Light, completed St. Lucie 2 in 1983 on Florida's east coast.
With no debate, the Florida Public Service Commission swiftly approved the project Tuesday morning. It still faces several regulatory hurdles, but customers will likely pay even if the project stumbles. The impact on electric bills will be decided by the commission at a September hearing.
Progress Energy estimated in March that residential customers would see an increase of about $9 a month. That estimate may have changed as the utility has redacted previously public estimates in recent filings before the commission.
The St. Petersburg utility plans to file this summer for a license from the federal Nuclear Regulatory Commission, which will take two to three years. Progress Energy is also waiting on a review by the state Department of Environmental Protection.
Preliminary construction work could begin next year on the 5,100-acre Levy County site, which stretches north of the Florida Barge Canal along the east side of U.S. 19, several miles north of Crystal River. The utility needs to build access roads, and possibly a barge loading dock in the canal and a rail line to the construction site.
Progress Energy said the project is the best way to meet growing power needs while reducing greenhouse gas emissions.
"Carbon-free nuclear power is a strategic asset in our statewide effort to become energy-independent, to reduce our reliance on more volatile-priced fossil fuels, and to provide a balanced approach to meet the challenges of growth and climate change," said Jeff Lyash, president and chief executive officer of Progress Energy Florida.
Critics have attacked it as too expensive and risky.
"This project has a long ways to go, and there's a lot of money at stake," said Bill Newton, executive director of the Florida Consumer Action Network. "We think it's a big mistake to raise people's power bills for something that may never be needed."
The utility plans to build two Westinghouse AP1000 nuclear reactors at a cost of $14-billion, plus $3-billion for nearly 200 miles of transmission lines through nine counties. The first reactor is schedule to come on line in 2016, and the second the following year.
Asjylyn Loder can be reached at aloder@sptimes.com or (813) 225-3117.
>>FAST FACTS
What does the decision mean for you?
Customers could start seeing the cost of the plant in their monthly bills starting in January. The amount will be determined at a hearing in September.
What's next?
Progress Energy needs to return before the Public Service Commission in September for the rate hearing. The utility also needs to win approval from the Florida Department of Environmental Protection and the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission. The federal licensing application could take two to three years. Progress Energy wants to have the first reactor on line in 2016 and the second the following year.
Sources: Progress Energy, Florida Public Service Commission
[Last modified: Jul 19, 2008 10:25 AM]
Comments on this article
by Patrick
Jul 19, 2008 10:25 AM
Projected growth is Florida has decreased. It will never be the same here. Nuclear plants are not needed, unless Progress energy wants to sell excess power to other states while ruining hours. PUBLIC SERVICES COMMISSION, WHAT A JOKE. POOR CUSTOMER.
by darryl
Jul 18, 2008 11:03 AM
i know this will be better for all in the long run.but this is no diffrent then the baseball stadium thing.why is this passing with-out our vote?why do we have to pay for the construction?can we charge people for gas when we go pay bills?
by Vladislav
Jul 18, 2008 10:57 AM
Solar panels? Windmills? What a joke. Did any of you have any idea how many of those you need to replace just one reactor? Aparently not but you sure like your A/C's and your SUV's. Over 10 million households in Florida X $9 X 8 years ~ 9 billion !!!
by DBB
Jul 18, 2008 10:34 AM
Why are we paying 17 billion for a couple o nukes when they are spending 5 billion in Texas for wind farms to power 4 million homes?!?!?!
by Greg
Jul 17, 2008 7:51 AM
Thank you progress energy. I need more power to charge my next car and to power my a/c and other luxuries at a reasonable cost. I do not want my electric bill to be $600/month using oil in 2016. $150/month would be better on nuclear.
by aj
Jul 16, 2008 7:37 PM
Why should the people be paying for something they aren't receiving? I know we have to do something quickly, but, we don't even know what to do with the waste and we are charging ahead like a blind bull.
by Sam
Jul 16, 2008 7:33 PM
Absolutely ridiculous to think that Nuclear Powered Energy is a viable solution to energy independence for the state. Who's backyard is the nuclear waste going to be stored? Why not build a solar plant to supplement fossil fuels a.k.a Sunshine State.
by Pete
Jul 16, 2008 7:27 PM
Heck they will collect all this money and never get to build the plants. We will invest into another pink elephant and they will get to keep our money and we will never see the power
by DM
Jul 16, 2008 7:27 PM
Oil, coal, gas, (they own the power companies), lobbyists, PSC, republicans, Bush, Gas $4.20/gal. They're kicking the American sleeping dog. Coming very soon: Solar, Wind, Hydrogen. Did you get it yet?
by Frank
Jul 16, 2008 7:26 PM
Let's see: 17 billion and 8 years in construction. My prediction is at least double and possibly triple in both dollars and years. Does anyone seriously believe that we will ever see such mega projects like nuclear plants ever completed.
by Jacob
Jul 16, 2008 7:21 PM
But what isn't mentioned in the article is the waste produced by nuclear power and the fact that there is nothing to do with it other than bury it in the ground. Build something that has a non-reversable negative effect...it's carbon free alright.
by tim
Jul 16, 2008 7:13 PM
Good news. 35 years after our last so-called "oil/energy crises", we start doing something about it. A couple of big fat nukes charging our new electric cars and solar water heaters on top of our houses and we'll be saying "Iran who?"
by Kevin
Jul 16, 2008 7:10 PM
Why is it that nobody wants to pay for a good future investment? If they build these reactors now, then they can shut down an equilavent wattage amount of fossil fuel plants. No paying for million of gallons of oil or coal every year. Lower bills.
by Jake
Jul 16, 2008 4:05 PM
Why not wait to charge the consumer AFTER NRC approval - not before. Oh yeah, this is Floriduh where citizens get ripped off every week.
by Richard
Jul 16, 2008 3:36 PM
Hey, when I want to expand my business, I have to find someone to finance me, I don't charge my customers. Where's the capitalism?
by Frank
Jul 16, 2008 8:05 AM
Unbelievable, growth has slowed, economy is dead, Progress Energy is laying off people in several areas, and we have to finance what in my opinion will be a colossal and costly mistake if these plants are built.
Subscribe to the Times
Click here for daily delivery
of the St. Petersburg Times.