Make us your home page
Instagram

Fate of nuclear fee depends on disparate House, Senate bills

TALLAHASSEE — Florida legislators continued to fast-track two proposals on Tuesday to rework the unpopular nuclear fee on customer utility bills, but activists warned that the two plans could have drastically different impacts on customers.

The House bill (PCB 13-01) will allow Progress Energy and Florida Power & Light to continue collecting the controversial nuclear fee to pay for the development of power plants, even if the plants never get constructed. The Senate plan, SB 1472, could end the fee if the utilities fail to obtain a license from the Nuclear Regulatory Commission — a process that the federal government has currently put on hold.

Since 2006, when lawmakers passed the nuclear cost recovery statute to encourage development of nuclear power, Florida customers of Progress Energy and Florida Power & Light have paid an estimated $1.5 billion in fees to pay for the development of future nuclear power plants. Both the Senate and House bills could put an end to development of additional nuclear power plants outside of the existing proposals, but each takes a different approach to the current projects.

"The Senate has a framework to impose a series of new decision points that say it's much better to walk away from the $1.5 billion we've already spent than to waste another $35 billion more,'' said Mark Cooper, a senior fellow with the Institute for Energy and the Environment at the Vermont Law School, who has analyzed the bills. "The House does exactly the opposite."

Progress Energy has charged customers more than $1 billion to expand the now-crippled Crystal River nuclear power plant and to start developing a new nuclear power plant in Levy County. The company terminated the Crystal River project, but has kept $150 million of the money in profits from all its projects. Florida Power & Light collected $530 million from the nuclear fee and used the money to finance expansions to its existing power plants at Turkey Point and in St. Lucie County. It has also proposed building two new reactors at Turkey Point, but has not obtained a permit to do it.

Florida's utility companies have said they oppose any change to the current law, but did not make any formal statements at Tuesday's hearings.

Voter discontent with Progress Energy's troubled power plant has prompted four bay area senators to take the more aggressive approach to revamping the law, although they have stopped short of repealing the proposal.

Under the Senate bill, after the utility obtains its license for the nuclear plant it must petition the Public Service Commission before it can get approval to charge customers for any additional costs associated with the plant's development.

"If we had this bill in place six years ago, the issues dealing with the Progress Energy Levy plant, instead of being an $800 million project, it would have been significantly lower,'' said Sen. John Legg, R-Trinity, a Senate bill sponsor.

Susan Glickman, lobbyist for the Southern Alliance for Clean Energy, which is pushing for alternatives to nuclear power, said effectiveness of the Senate bill "depends upon how rigorous the Public Service Commission is in their review."

The Senate Community Affairs Committee voted unanimously to approve the bill.

By contrast, the House takes a more inclusive approach — allowing the companies to continue business as usual but imposes new rules on future nuclear projects. It adds a requirement that utilities include a line item on each customer's utility bill showing how much is going toward nuclear construction.

The House Regulatory Affairs Committee rejected a series of amendments by Rep. Michelle Rehwinkel Vasilinda, D-Tallahassee, that would have forced state regulators to consider alternatives to nuclear power before imposing the nuclear fee. "It keeps us from picking winners and losers,'' she said.

But House Republicans, many of whom were elected on the strength of the utility industry's campaign contributions, have flatly rejected using the rewrite of the nuclear fees law to allow for any competition to the utility giants. Rep. Jose Felix Diaz, R-Miami, House Energy and Utilities Committee chairman, said the process regulators go through "is already pretty extensive" and the changes are not needed.

Both bills change the interest rate the utility companies can charge customers to pay for planning and development of the nuclear plants, saving an estimated $800 million over the 20-year life of the construction process.

The Senate bill also allows the PSC to authorize a rebate to customers in certain circumstances, but neither Legg, nor Curt Kiser, the general counsel for the Public Service Commission, could conceive of any scenario that would allow customers to receive a refund.

Contact Mary Ellen Klas at meklas@MiamiHerald.com and on Twitter@MaryEllenKlas

Fate of nuclear fee depends on disparate House, Senate bills 04/16/13 [Last modified: Tuesday, April 16, 2013 8:22pm]
Photo reprints | Article reprints

© 2017 Tampa Bay Times

    

Join the discussion: Click to view comments, add yours

Loading...
  1. Trigaux: Tampa Bay household income tops $50,000 but still makes us look poor

    Personal Finance

    The good news is Tampa Bay's median household income finally crawled above $50,000 last year. The bad news is that figure — officially $51,115 by new U.S. Census Bureau data — still puts the Tampa Bay region as the poorest of the nation's 25 largest metro areas.

    Tampa Bay still has the lowest median household income among the 25 most populous metro areas, according to U.S. Census Bureau data.
[Times]
  2. Make-A-Wish Foundation aims to help more kids in Tampa Bay

    Health

    The Make-A-Wish Foundation is on the lookout for sick children in the Tampa Bay area who need a once-in-a-lifetime pick-me-up.

    Grace Savage, a 10-year-old girl with a chromosomal disorder made a trek to the Clearwater Marine Aquarium last year, courtesy of the Make-A-Wish Foundation. The foundation intends to beef up its presence in the Tampa Bay area after a reorganization. The region is now the responsibility of the foundation's Southern Florida chapter, one of the most active in the country, with more than 11,000 wishes granted so far. [JIM DAMASKE   |   Times ]
  3. Florida hides details in nursing home reports. Federal agencies don't.

    Medicine

    TALLAHASSEE — Gov. Rick Scott widened his offensive Thursday against the Broward nursing home he blames for the deaths of 10 residents by setting up a tip line for information, but when it comes to access to the inspection reports of all nursing homes, the governor's administration has heavily censored what the …

    In the foreground is a document detailing the findings of a Feb. 2016 inspection at the Rehabilitation Center at Hollywood Hills obtained from a federal agency, the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services. Behind it is the state?€™s version of the same document, from the Agency for Health Care Administration, showing how it has been redacted before being released to the public. [Miami Herald]
  4. 'Toxic' times: How repeal of Florida's tax on services reverberates, 30 years later

    State Roundup

    TALLAHASSEE — Long before Hurricane Irma attacked Florida, the state faced a troubled fiscal future that the storm will only make worse.

    Robertson says the tax debate is now “toxic.”
  5. Fewer Tampa Bay homeowners are underwater on their mortgages

    Real Estate

    The percentage of Tampa Bay homeowners underwater on their mortgages continues to drop. In the second quarter of this year, 10.2 percent of borrowers had negative equity compared to nearly 15 percent in the same period a year ago, CoreLogic reported Thursday. Nationally, 5.4 percent of all mortgaged homes were …

    The percentage of Tampa Bay homeowners underwater on their mortgages  continues to drop. [Times file photo]