Make us your home page
Instagram

Fed shouldn't try to pop bubbles — just ask Sweden

NEW YORK

To pop or not to pop, that is the question for central bankers.

Whether 'tis wiser for the economy to suffer the booms and busts of irrational exuberance, or to take arms against a sea of bubbles and by opposing end them. In other words, should the Federal Reserve try to clean up only after a bubble has already popped, or should it actively try to pop bubbles so the cleanup is easier?

Now, as you might have guessed, the choice isn't so simple. While nobody thinks policymakers can afford to ignore financial froth anymore, the economy can't afford for them to pay too much attention to it, either. Raising rates would eventually burst any bubbles we may be experiencing — but that would come at the cost of higher unemployment. Regulating away a bubble makes more sense, since it wouldn't hurt the rest of the economy, but it's not clear that regulators can actually pull this off.

That's a lesson Sweden has more than learned. Sweden has become the unlikely guinea pig for raising rates to fight a bubble. Now until a few years ago, Sweden had been what the New York Times' Neil Irwin called the "rock star of the recovery": Aggressive fiscal stimulus had helped it bounce back from the crisis faster than almost any other country. But, despite still-low inflation, its central bank, the Riksbank, began to worry that it had bounced back too fast and that households were taking on too much debt, up to 174 percent of their income. That's why, over the protests of Lars Svensson, one of its deputy governors and one of the world's leading monetary economists, Sweden's central bank began hiking rates in July 2010.

When inflation refused to show up, the Riksbank said it still needed to do so, to keep a housing bubble in check.

This didn't just cripple Sweden's recovery. It crippled Swedish households. And in doing so, it paradoxically made a crisis more likely. See, Sweden's economy had been doing better than most others, but not so much that it could withstand seven rate hikes while joblessness was still high. This premature tightening kept unemployment from falling much further, and made inflation fall well below target — into negative territory.

And this is the key point: Low inflation means higher real-debt burdens. So raising rates to try to stop households from taking on more debt actually increases their inflation-adjusted indebtedness. It's a policy with almost all costs and no benefits — and that's according to the Riksbank's own calculations. As Svensson points out, the central bank estimates that the benefits of raising rates to try to pop a bubble are only 0.14 percent of the costs. No wonder the Riksbank recently reversed course and cut rates back near zero.

So Sweden isn't trying to pop its bubble anymore. It's trying to make it less dangerous instead. It's using what economists call "macroprudential regulations" to try to limit risky debt — for example, by making borrowers pay back their mortgages faster. Central bankers realize they can't make policy that helps the financial economy but hurts the real one without it eventually rebounding onto the financial one, too. Instead, they need to give the real economy the policy it needs, and the financial one the regulation it needs.

It's a matter of slowing, not stopping, the bubble — and surviving it if it does pop.

Fed shouldn't try to pop bubbles — just ask Sweden 07/10/14 [Last modified: Thursday, July 10, 2014 6:32pm]
Photo reprints | Article reprints

Copyright: For copyright information, please check with the distributor of this item, Washington Post.
    

Join the discussion: Click to view comments, add yours

Loading...
  1. Trigaux: Tampa Bay household income tops $50,000 but still makes us look poor

    Personal Finance

    The good news is Tampa Bay's median household income finally crawled above $50,000 last year. The bad news is that figure — officially $51,115 by new U.S. Census Bureau data — still puts the Tampa Bay region as the poorest of the nation's 25 largest metro areas.

    Tampa Bay still has the lowest median household income among the 25 most populous metro areas, according to U.S. Census Bureau data.
[Times]
  2. Make-A-Wish Foundation aims to help more kids in Tampa Bay

    Health

    The Make-A-Wish Foundation is on the lookout for sick children in the Tampa Bay area who need a once-in-a-lifetime pick-me-up.

    Grace Savage, a 10-year-old girl with a chromosomal disorder made a trek to the Clearwater Marine Aquarium last year, courtesy of the Make-A-Wish Foundation. The foundation intends to beef up its presence in the Tampa Bay area after a reorganization. The region is now the responsibility of the foundation's Southern Florida chapter, one of the most active in the country, with more than 11,000 wishes granted so far. [JIM DAMASKE   |   Times ]
  3. Florida hides details in nursing home reports. Federal agencies don't.

    Medicine

    TALLAHASSEE — Gov. Rick Scott widened his offensive Thursday against the Broward nursing home he blames for the deaths of 10 residents by setting up a tip line for information, but when it comes to access to the inspection reports of all nursing homes, the governor's administration has heavily censored what the …

    In the foreground is a document detailing the findings of a Feb. 2016 inspection at the Rehabilitation Center at Hollywood Hills obtained from a federal agency, the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services. Behind it is the state?€™s version of the same document, from the Agency for Health Care Administration, showing how it has been redacted before being released to the public. [Miami Herald]
  4. 'Toxic' times: How repeal of Florida's tax on services reverberates, 30 years later

    State Roundup

    TALLAHASSEE — Long before Hurricane Irma attacked Florida, the state faced a troubled fiscal future that the storm will only make worse.

    Robertson says the tax debate is now “toxic.”
  5. Fewer Tampa Bay homeowners are underwater on their mortgages

    Real Estate

    The percentage of Tampa Bay homeowners underwater on their mortgages continues to drop. In the second quarter of this year, 10.2 percent of borrowers had negative equity compared to nearly 15 percent in the same period a year ago, CoreLogic reported Thursday. Nationally, 5.4 percent of all mortgaged homes were …

    The percentage of Tampa Bay homeowners underwater on their mortgages  continues to drop. [Times file photo]