Make us your home page
Instagram

New privacy rules for Internet service would be illegal, providers say

As you spend more of your time and money on the Internet, the big companies responsible for connecting you to it are becoming more interested in using your browsing history and online habits in the same way that Google or Facebook does — turning that valuable behavioral information into ad dollars and using the data to power new online services to compete with Web companies.

Now, Internet providers want to thwart a federal proposal aimed at enhancing online privacy, in the latest battle between industry and government regulators over the future of the Web.

The proposal from the Federal Communications Commission could put limits on some of that commercial activity, requiring broadband companies such as AT&T and Comcast to obey some of the same privacy regulations that govern traditional phone companies. Under the existing rules, carriers have to protect personal information that you provide as a part of receiving the service you pay for — things like your name, address and credit card information. And they can't share that information unless you actively say so.

Internet providers have not historically been required to follow these regulations, although they are legally obligated to carry out any commitments they make to consumers in their privacy policies and certain state laws. So it's no surprise to see broadband industry groups pushing back, arguing that the proposed rules would be unconstitutional and illegal, not to mention burdensome. And they have raised a big debate over just how different, if at all, Internet providers are from digital media companies.

You see, if companies like Google basically know everything about you already, then an Internet provider that knows everything about you isn't all that different, and shouldn't have to live by different rules. That's the argument from the industry, which was laid out Friday in a blog post from AT&T.

The FCC is under "a wrong-headed conclusion … that ISPs are uniquely in a position to develop highly detailed and comprehensive profiles of their customers," wrote Bob Quinn, AT&T's senior vice president of federal regulatory affairs. "It is just not true."

The FCC argues that Internet providers are indeed in a "unique position," to use Quinn's words, because whereas Google might be able to capture a lot of information about you when you use Google's services, Internet providers can gather information about you no matter whose websites you visit. Their whole job is to take your requests about where you want to go on the Internet and what you want to do, as part of providing your service.

"An ISP handles all of its customers' network traffic, which means it has an unobstructed view of all of their unencrypted online activity — the websites they visit, the applications they use," the agency said in March.

We've seen glimmers of how Internet providers would like to monetize your data. Companies such as Verizon have been buying up advertising technology and content companies such as AOL and rolling out new video services, such as Go90, that it hopes to begin selling ads against. AT&T offers discounts to some customers who agree to let the company track their Web history for advertising purposes.

The industry says new government privacy rules would constrain how its ad-supported programs can work, which would put it at a disadvantage relative to Internet companies.

New privacy rules for Internet service would be illegal, providers say 05/27/16 [Last modified: Friday, May 27, 2016 7:39pm]
Photo reprints | Article reprints

© 2017 Tampa Bay Times

    

Join the discussion: Click to view comments, add yours

Loading...
  1. Massachusetts firm buys Tampa's Element apartment tower

    Real Estate

    TAMPA — Downtown Tampa's Element apartment tower sold this week to a Massachusetts-based real estate investment company that plans to upgrade the skyscraper's amenities and operate it long-term as a rental community.

    The Element apartment high-rise at 808 N Franklin St. in downtown Tampa has been sold to a Northland Investment Corp., a Massachusetts-based real estate investment company. JIM DAMASKE  |  Times
  2. New York town approves Legoland proposal

    News

    GOSHEN, N.Y. — New York is one step closer to a Lego dreamland. Goshen, a small town about fifty miles northwest of the Big Apple, has approved the site plan for a $500 million Legoland amusement park.

    A small New York town, Goshen approved the site plan for a $500 million Legoland amusement park. Legoland Florida is in Winter Haven. [Times file  photo]
  3. Jordan Park to get $20 million makeover and new senior housing

    Real Estate

    By WAVENEY ANN MOORE

    Times Staff Writer

    ST. PETERSBURG —The St. Petersburg Housing Authority, which bought back the troubled Jordan Park public housing complex this year, plans to spend about $20 million to improve the 237-unit property and construct a new three-story building for …

    Jordan Park, the historic public housing complex, is back in the hands of the St. Petersburg Housing Authority. The agency is working to improve the 237-unit complex. But the latest plan to build a new three-story building for seniors will mean 31 families have to find new homes. [LARA CERRI   |   Tampa Bay Times]
  4. Coming soon at two Tampa Bay area hospitals: a cancer treatment that could replace chemo

    Health

    A new cancer treatment that could eventually replace chemotherapy and bone marrow transplants — along with their debilitating side effects — soon will be offered at two of Tampa Bay's top-tier hospitals.

    Dr. Frederick Locke at Moffitt Cancer Center in Tampa is a principal investigator for an experimental therapy that retrains white blood cells in the body's immune system to fight cancer cells. The U.S. Food and Drug Administration approved these so-called "CAR-T" treatments for adults this month. In trials, 82 percent of cases responded well to the treatment, and 44 percent are still in remission at least eight months later, Locke said. [CHRIS URSO   |   Times]
  5. Regulator blasts Wells Fargo for deceptive auto insurance program

    Banking

    Wells Fargo engaged in unfair and deceptive practices, failed to properly manage risks and hasn't set aside enough money to pay back the customers it harmed, according to a confidential report by federal regulators.

    Wells Fargo engaged in unfair and deceptive practices, failed to properly manage risks and hasn't set aside enough money to pay back the customers it harmed, according to a confidential report by federal regulators.
[Photo by Spencer Platt/Getty Images, 2017]