Make us your home page

Geithner's inaction puts financial regulation onus on Obama

Let's be thankful that we live in a country that has been remarkably good-natured, generous and pragmatic in the face of a nasty economic crisis.

What really sticks in our craw, however, is that while most of the country is hunkered down, Wall Street continues to feast on a bounty of trading profits.

Fairly or unfairly, the official who has come to personify this let-them-eat-stuffing attitude is Treasury Secretary Tim Geithner, who can't seem to decide whose side of the buffet table he's really on. It was Geithner who, at the height of the financial crisis last year, best articulated the unpleasant truth that we could save the financial system or we could punish the banks, but we couldn't do both at the same time. Now that the system has been saved, he seems to have lost his appetite for retribution.

A telling moment came at the meeting of finance ministers in Scotland earlier this month, when Geithner gave a back-of-the-hand to the idea of a global tax on financial transactions as a way of raising money for economic stabilization while also discouraging high-volume, short-term speculation. In the past, if any country imposed such a tax, trading would simply move somewhere else. But with most industrial countries now willing to act in concert, a transaction tax had possibilities.

By itself, perhaps, the incident could have been written off as a difference of opinion about means rather than ends. But it seemed to be in accord with Geithner's determination to avoid upsetting markets or upending the Wall Street order.

This was the same Geithner, after all, who has pushed not only to preserve but expand the powers of a Federal Reserve that had been the regulatory hand-maiden of Wall Street banks and investment houses. It was Geithner and the Treasury that proposed to enshrine the doctrine of "too big to fail" into law, rejecting calls to break up the biggest banks.

And it has been Geithner who, for all his talk about reforming the structure of Wall Street pay, has never been able to bring himself to declare the simple truth that Wall Street pay is absurdly high.

It's fair to say that Geithner's credibility has been so tarnished in the eyes of Congress and the public that President Obama will now have to devote more personal attention to these issues.

Obama could start by instructing the Justice Department to launch an antitrust inquiry to determine why Wall Street continues to earn the extravagant profits from which the bonuses are derived.

The president could press Congress to close the tax loophole that allows managers of hedge funds and private-equity funds to pay lower tax rates than their secretaries.

And Obama could ask the Group of 20 to put the transaction tax back on the agenda, and vow to use the $50 billion a year in revenue that it would generate here to finance the much-needed transportation infrastructure improvements the president has proposed.

In truth, none of this will create the jobs the country desperately needs. But governing is as much about symbolism as it is substance. Only by taking steps to assure the nation that the economy will no longer be rigged in Wall Street's favor can the president regain the political high ground and push through a new jobs agenda.

Geithner's inaction puts financial regulation onus on Obama 11/29/09 [Last modified: Sunday, November 29, 2009 8:54pm]
Photo reprints | Article reprints

© 2017 Tampa Bay Times


Join the discussion: Click to view comments, add yours

  1. 'What Happened'? Clinton memoir sold 300,000 copies in first week


    Despite being met with decidedly mixed reviews, What Happened, Hillary Clinton's new memoir about the 2016 presidential campaign, sold a whopping 300,000 copies in its first week.

    The new memoir by former presidential candidate Hillary Clinton sold 300,000 copies in its first week.
  2. After Irma topples tree, home sale may be gone with the wind

    Real Estate

    ST. PETERSBURG — To house hunters searching online, the home for sale in St. Petersburg's Shore Acres neighborhood couldn't have looked more appealing — fully renovated and shaded by the leafy canopy of a magnificent ficus benjamini tree.

    Hurricane Irma's winds recently blew over a large ficus tree, left, in the yard of a home at 3601Alabama Ave NE, right, in Shore Acres which is owned by Brett Schroder who is trying to sell the house.
[SCOTT KEELER   |   Times]

  3. Unemployment claims double in Florida after Hurricane Irma


    The number of Americans seeking unemployment benefits dropped by 23,000 last week to 259,000 as the economic impact of Hurricane Harvey began to fade.

    Homes destroyed by Hurricane Irma on Big Pine Key last week. Hurricane Irma continued to have an impact on the job market in Florida, where unemployment claims more than doubled from the previous week.
[The New York Times file photo]
  4. Calling it a 'dangerous precedent,' Tampa chamber opposes city tax increase


    TAMPA — Calling the possibility a "dangerous precedent," the Greater Tampa Chamber of Commerce on Thursday took the rare step of opposing City Hall's proposal to raise Tampa's property tax rate because of its impact on business.

    The Greater Tampa Chamber of Commerce voted against supporting a city tax hike on commercial property. Pictured is Bob Rohrlack, CEO of the chamber. | [Times file photo]
  5. Did Hurricane Irma speed the end of Florida orange juice?


    Hurricane Irma plundered Florida's orange belt, leaving a trail of uprooted trees, downed fruit and flooded groves worse than anything growers say they have seen in more than 20 years.

    A large number of oranges lie on the ground at the Story Grove orange grove in the wake of Hurricane Irma on Sept. 13, 2017, in Lake Wales. [Photo by Brian Blanco | Getty Images]