Make us your home page

Peer-to-peer lending has yet to find firm footing

Renaud Laplanche is co-founder of Lending Club, a Redwood City, Calif., peer-to-peer online lending company. It began in 2007, seeking higher credit scores from its borrowers than Prosper does.

New York Times

Renaud Laplanche is co-founder of Lending Club, a Redwood City, Calif., peer-to-peer online lending company. It began in 2007, seeking higher credit scores from its borrowers than Prosper does.

When peer-to-peer online lending first became possible in the United States five years ago, using the Web to make money by lending it to fellow citizens in need seemed wonderfully subversive.

No more banks! Let the people play loan officer! The hype was literally suffused with the rhetoric of revolution when a company called Prosper began operations in February 2006. "Prosper gives people the opportunity to take back the marketplace for consumer credit," the company's co-founder, Chris Larsen, said in its news release.

The big idea went something like this: Borrowers would post a request for funds and explain why they needed the money. Lenders could put money into part or all of any loan that caught their fancy. And Prosper (and later, Lending Club) would run credit checks of aspiring borrowers for the lenders, watch for fraud, collect and distribute monthly payments and take some money off the top for itself.

People borrowed for breast implants and home renovations, and lenders pored over payment data in search of patterns that could help them select better borrowers in the future. To the Securities and Exchange Commission, however, all of this looked like investing, not lending, and both companies stopped taking in new lenders for months in parts of 2008 and 2009 to get their regulatory houses in order.

Even today, the companies are still trying to persuade more than 20 states, including sizable ones like Texas, New Jersey, Pennsylvania and Ohio, to let individual lenders there put money into loans. The industry appears to be settling into something both less and potentially more than it once promised.

There's a far more basic function that these companies actually serve: The majority of customers who borrow use the loans to pay off higher-interest debt. They are paying 18 percent or more to credit card companies, and they seek Prosper or Lending Club loans that charge, say, 10, 12 or 14 percent. As an investor, your return would be the interest rate that borrowers pay, minus the companies' fee and whatever money the borrowers fail to repay.

This has attracted investors who are hardly motivated by helping the little guy or needling the banks. Hedge funds are writing seven-figure checks to Lending Club to get in on the action. More conservative types, like money managers for wealthy families, are also dipping their toes in. In total, borrowers have signed up for more than $400 million in loans through the two companies in the last five years.

And so the question is this: Just how badly could you get burned if you invested a little money?

I've been asking this question since Prosper made its debut. While the basic outline of the business hasn't changed much, there was more room to do something foolish when Prosper began.

Back then, the company would accept loan applications from people with FICO credit scores as low as the subprime 520 (or lower in the first couple of months, before the frightening default rates caused the company to establish a floor).

Human nature being what it is, starry-eyed lenders were attracted to the higher interest rates that people with low credit scores seemed willing to pay.

And wouldn't you know it? Of all of the loans that Prosper helped originate in its first three years, more than one-third went bad. The average investor lost 4.95 percent annually on the loans made during that period. Former lenders now spew bile toward the company on the user forums at, and the company is the target of a class-action suit.

Lending Club was more conservative when it began in 2007. Its minimum credit score for borrowers was 640, and now it's 660, though most borrowers have had scores higher than 700. It set the interest rates for loans based on borrowers' credit history and other factors. Lending Club's co-founder, Renaud Laplanche, said that no lender who had invested more than $10,000 on his platform (generally spreading money among loans) had ever lost money.

Prosper is now aping Lending Club's approach, raising its credit standards and getting rid of the loan auctions so it can set the loan terms itself.

Lending Club states in its government filings that its estimated default rates for loans of varying credit quality are not based on its own experience. Instead, it bases the guesses on decades of credit bureau data that looks at repayment rates on other types of loans.

But peer-to-peer loans may well perform differently. Aspiring borrowers, for instance, can and do make up all sorts of stories to be more attractive or sympathetic.

Lending Club does not necessarily check out all these tales.

And if you cannot necessarily trust some percentage of the borrowers, and the still-young companies do not have much data on completed three-year loans, which are the most popular ones, this sure seems less a bond purchase than a new type of casino game in Las Vegas.

Peer-to-peer lending has yet to find firm footing 02/12/11 [Last modified: Saturday, February 12, 2011 3:31am]
Photo reprints | Article reprints

Copyright: For copyright information, please check with the distributor of this item, New York Times.

Join the discussion: Click to view comments, add yours

  1. Rick Scott appoints 'my friend,' Jimmy Patronis, as Florida CFO

    State Roundup

    TALLAHASSEE — Gov. Rick Scott on Monday appointed a long-time friend and political supporter, Jimmy Patronis, to replace Jeff Atwater as Florida's next chief financial officer, making him one of three members of the Cabinet that sets state policy on a wide range of issues. He'll take over Friday.

    Rick Scott appoints Jimmy Patronis (background) as CFO. [STEVE BOUSQUET | Tampa Bay Times]
  2. Local gas prices plummet as Fourth of July holiday travel approaches


    TAMPA — Local gas prices are enjoying an unseasonal dip around the $2 mark just in time for the hectic Fourth of July holiday travel weekend.

    The price of regular unleaded gasoline has dropped to $1.99 at a Rally station on Pasadena Ave. South and Gulfport Boulevard South, South Pasadena.
[SCOTT KEELER   |   Times]

  3. Air bag recalls, lawsuits lead Takata to file for bankruptcy


    Shattered by recall costs and lawsuits, Japanese air bag maker Takata Corp. filed Monday for bankruptcy protection in Tokyo and the U.S., saying it was the only way it could keep on supplying replacements for faulty air bag inflators linked to the deaths of at least 16 people.

    Japanese air bag maker Takata Corp. CEO Shigehisa Takada bows during a press conference in Tokyo on Monday. Takata has filed for bankruptcy protection in Tokyo and the U.S., overwhelmed by lawsuits and recall costs related to its production of defective air bag inflators.
[(AP Photo/Shizuo Kambayashi]
  4. Airbag maker Takata bankruptcy filing expected in Japan, U.S.


    DETROIT — Japanese airbag maker Takata Corp. has filed for bankruptcy protection in Tokyo and the U.S., overwhelmed by lawsuits and recall costs related to its production of faulty air bag inflators.

  5. Federal agencies demand records from SeaWorld theme park


    ORLANDO — Two federal agencies are reportedly demanding financial records from SeaWorld.

    Killer whales Ikaika and Corky participate in behaviors commonly done in the wild during SeaWorld's Killer Whale educational presentation in this photo from Jan. 9. SeaWorld has been subpoenaed by two federal agencies for comments that executives and the company made in August 2014 about the impact from the "Blackfish" documentary. 
[Nelvin C. Cepeda/San Diego Union-Tribune/TNS]