Make us your home page
Instagram

Researching life insurance

The words "life insurance" have been called a euphemism for death insurance, but who wants to think about it that way? The important thing is you think about it, and get insured, if needed.

• A primer was posted by the Boston branch of the Better Business Bureau. The post has simple explanations of the many kinds of life insurance policies, most of which are variations on two: whole life (policies that build cash value) and term life (policies that are cheaper than whole life, offer protection only for a set number of years and have no cash value if the term ends while you're still alive). http://goo.gl/cZu7Gy

• Bankrate.com writer Jay MacDonald talks to experts about "myths about buying life insurance." "Insurance is insurance; it's not an investment vehicle," says Tony Steuer of the insurance consumer group United Policyholders. James Hunt, with the Consumer Federation of America, recommends term-life and 401(k) investments as an alternative to whole-life policies, saying, "The problem is, 40 or 50 percent of the buyers drop out within 10 years and never get a good return on their money." http://goo.gl/esd3p

• Tips at Forbes.com explain more about term insurance. "If you are in a situation (where) your dependents will not rely on you financially forever, your best bet is probably a term-life policy," writes contributor Jessica Bosari. http://goo.gl/iMA0X

• If you get life insurance and then die, how likely is it that your beneficiaries can collect on the policy? That's an important question to ask before you buy. You can look up Standard & Poor's ratings for insurance companies from this tool page at Insure.com, an independent insurance website. http://goo.gl/5N1hsh

Researching life insurance 05/23/14 [Last modified: Sunday, May 25, 2014 9:53pm]
Photo reprints | Article reprints

Copyright: For copyright information, please check with the distributor of this item, Tribune News Service.
    

Join the discussion: Click to view comments, add yours

Loading...
  1. For Gov. Rick Scott, 'fighting' could mean vetoing entire state budget

    State Roundup

    Every day, Gov. Rick Scott is getting a lot of advice.

    The last time a Florida governor vetoed the education portion of the state budget was in 1983. Gov. Bob Graham blasted fellow Democrats for their “willing acceptance of mediocrity.”
  2. Potential new laws further curb Floridians' right to government in the Sunshine

    State Roundup

    TALLAHASSEE — From temporarily shielding the identities of murder witnesses to permanently sealing millions of criminal and arrest records, state lawmakers did more this spring than they have in all but one of the past 22 years to chip away at Floridians' constitutional guarantees to access government records and …

    The Legislature passed 17 new exemptions to the Sunshine Law, according to a tally by the First Amendment Foundation.
  3. Data breach exposes 469 Social Security numbers, thousands of concealed weapons holders

    Corporate

    Social Security numbers for up to 469 people and information about thousands of concealed weapons holders were exposed in a data breach at Florida the Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services. The breach, which the agency believes happened about two weeks ago, occurred in an online payments system, spokesperson …

    Commissioner of Agriculture Adam Putnam on Monday that nearly 500 people may have had their Social Security numbers obtained in a data breach in his office.
[Times file photo]

  4. Trigaux: Can Duke Energy Florida's new chief grow a business when customers use less power?

    Energy

    Let's hope Harry Sideris has a bit of Harry Houdini in him.

    Duke Energy Florida president Harry Sideris laid out his prioriities for the power company ranging from improved customer service to the use of more large-scale solar farms to provide electricity. And he acknowledged a critical challenge: People are using less electricity these days. [SCOTT KEELER   |   Times]
  5. Citigroup agrees to pay nearly $100 million fine for Mexican subsidiary

    Banking

    NEW YORK — Citigroup has agreed to pay nearly $100 million to federal authorities to settle claims that a lack of internal controls and negligence in the bank's Mexican subsidiary may have allowed customers to commit money laundering.

    Citigroup has agreed to pay nearly $100 million to federal authorities to settle claims that a lack of internal controls and negligence in the bank's Mexican subsidiary may have allowed customers to commit money laundering. 
[Associated Press file photo]