Make us your home page

Complexities of reverse mortgages snag homeowners

Well into their senior years, Kenny and Fran Goodnow were struggling to pay their mortgage in 2007 when a salesman offered what seemed like a wonderful solution.

A reverse mortgage would tap the equity in their St. Petersburg home to pay off their existing loan and give them extra cash for travel, a new car, a nest egg. Best of all, they could stay in their house.

The couple only had to take care of the property taxes and insurance, which totalled barely $100 a month back then.

"He told us you get paid every month instead of you paying the bank,'' said Kenny, now 87.

Soon after, their insurance premium jumped so high they could not afford it. They fell behind on their bills. The reverse mortgage company demanded that they pay $217,000 or lose their home of 25 years.

The couple now wish they had better understood the seemingly simple reverse mortgage, a frequent lament of homeowners who turn to what is actually a complex financial product. And as increasing numbers of baby boomers become eligible for reverse mortgages, concern looms that many others could find themselves in the same predicament as the Goodnows.

Some will end up fighting to keep their homes.

That's why Fran, 71, was in a Pinellas County courtroom Tuesday morning, her age-speckled hands clutching the lectern as she nervously faced a judge.

"Mrs. Goodnow, the mortgage company is filing for foreclosure,'' the judge said. "Is there something you want to tell me?''

• • •

You've probably seen the TV ads: Actors including Henry Winkler, Robert Wagner and Fred Thompson tout reverse mortgages as "a safe, effective financial tool.''

"It allows you to eliminate monthly payments, pay some bills or simply enjoy your retirement,'' Thompson, also a former U.S. senator and presidential candidate, says in his folksy drawl. "It allows seniors to stay in their homes."

Most reverse mortgages are federally insured loans that enable people 62 and older to turn part of their home equity into cash. The homeowners can take a lump sum or receive monthly payments, or a combination of the two. Either way, they don't make monthly principal and interest payments.

When the homeowners move or die, the amount of the loan and the accumulated interest must be repaid. If there is enough equity remaining, the owners or their heirs can sell the home, pay what's owed to the reverse mortgage company and keep the rest.

The reverse mortgage company is counting on people not staying in the house for too long. Plus, if the house sells for less than what is owed, the Federal Housing Agency takes the loss, not the mortgage company.

Created by a Maine savings and loan in 1961, reverse mortgages were relatively uncommon until the real estate boom boosted home values in the early 2000s. New reverse mortgages peaked in 2009 at nearly 115,000 in the United States as many homeowners sought ways to stay financially afloat during a recession that eroded the value of their other investments. The numbers have declined to about 60,000 since then.

Reverse mortgages can be a useful financial tool for home­owners who have substantial equity, intend to live in their homes for many years, and plan to take the cash out over time instead of all at once.

That is not what usually happens, however. Three out of every four borrowers took all of their money up front in a lump sum, according to a 2012 study by the federal Consumer Financial Protection Bureau. Because many of them were "young'' seniors in their 60s, withdrawing so much money early in their retirement could mean less money to cover major expenses later in life.

"Reverse mortgages are complex products that are difficult for consumers to understand,'' the study stated.

The study also found a long-running problem with "deceptive advertising,'' including solicitations that imply a federally insured reverse mortgage is a government benefit rather than a loan.

Another potential problem: As of 2012, the consumer bureau said, "a surprisingly large proportion'' of reverse mortgage borrowers — 9.4 percent — were at risk of foreclosure because they didn't pay the taxes or insurance.

The numbers are particularly high in the Tampa Bay area, especially Pinellas County with its large senior population. Between 2007 and 2010, one big player in the reverse mortgage field, James B. Nutter & Co. of Kansas City, issued nearly 470 reverse mortgages to Pinellas homeowners, including the Goodnows. Of those, 27 percent have been in foreclosure.

The state's economic woes helped inflate those figures, said Paul Madson, the company's vice president.

"Florida was by far the worst-hit state," Madson said. "So I would expect the foreclosure rate to be much higher than practically anywhere else.''

As for who should take out a reverse mortgage, "there's not one right way to do a reverse mortgage or one right person,'' Madson said. "I think you have to know all the circumstances.''

• • •

The Goodnows bought their house in St. Petersburg's Historic Kenwood area in 1989 for $40,000.

A near-fatal car accident a decade later left Fran Goodnow, a certified nursing assistant, with permanent memory problems. Neither she nor Kenny, a retired security guard, remembers a series of refinancings that climaxed in 2007 with a $153,750 mortgage and payments of about $800 a month.

That's when Kenny noticed an ad for reverse mortgages.

Then, as now, anyone getting a federally insured reverse mortgage must first meet with a government-certified housing counselor who explains the complicated terms. Madson, of James B. Nutter & Co., said the Goodnows would have been required to go through counseling, although neither Fran nor Kenny recalls it.

Because Fran's credit was poor, she was instructed to deed the house over to Kenny, who would then be the sole name on the reverse mortgage.

Blind in one eye, dim-sighted in the other, Kenny signed the paperwork without paying much attention to the terms.

"Neither of us could read all that malarkey,'' Fran said.

Here's what they agreed to: James B. Nutter & Co. would pay off their existing $153,750 mortgage, so the couple would no longer have their $800 monthly payment. They would owe that $153,750, plus interest, to be deferred until Kenny died, moved out of the house or failed to pay the property taxes and insurance.

They quickly ran into trouble when two different companies canceled their insurance, first because of hazardous tree limbs on their property, then because they failed to make a payment. A new policy cost more than they could afford.

In 2012, the mortgage company started foreclosure proceedings. Kenny met with a company representative at a mediation session. "They wanted me to pay them,'' he said, so nothing came of it.

By Tuesday, the Goodnows owed $217,402.

Kenny was in a nursing home recovering from an infection and severe dehydration. So Fran, leaning on a cane, walked alone into the courtroom of Circuit Judge Jack Day. Two weeks earlier, she had lost her oldest son to a massive heart attack. Now she was about to lose her house.

When the case was called, a lawyer for the mortgage company said Kenny had failed to pay for insurance in 2009, 2010 and 2011. Fran intended to tell the judge that she and Kenny didn't understand how they could owe so much.

Instead, when Helinger asked if she wanted to say anything, she began to ramble about Kenny's health.

"Mrs. Goodnow, they say you still haven't paid your insurance,'' the judge gently redirected her.

"It was $300 a month, and we just couldn't pay it.''

"I sympathize with your husband in the hospital,'' the judge said, "but you understand I have to follow the law.'' With that, he gave the Goodnows until July 25 to get out of their house.

• • •

A few hours later, Fran was still trying to accept that she had less than 60 days to find another place to live. With their combined $1,500 a month in Social Security, she and Kenny hope to get an apartment in a facility for the handicapped.

Fran acknowledges that neither of them could maintain the 1,110-square-foot house, which has fallen into an obvious state of disrepair.

The mortgage company likely gambled wrong in loaning Kenny so much on the house, which now has a market value of just $87,500. But because the loan was federally insured, the company will get its money back and taxpayers will ultimately foot the bill.

What advice would the Goodnows give anyone considering a reverse mortgage?

"Don't take it!'' Kenny bellowed from his nursing home bed. "Unless you are 99 1/2 years old.''

"Or,'' added Fran, "at least until you understand it.''

Susan Taylor Martin can be reached at

The basics of reverse mortgages

Reverse mortgages allow people 62 and older to get cash from the equity in their homes. But they are loans that have to be paid back when the borrower dies, moves out of the house or fails to pay the property taxes and insurance. Here are some tips:

If you get a federally insured reverse mortgage (and most are) you must meet with a housing counselor who will explain the terms and help you decide if you are a suitable candidate.

If you or your spouse have health problems that might force a move in the near future, a reverse mortgage might not be right for you. The longer you stay in the house, the better.

Try to avoid taking all of the cash up front in a lump sum. You might not have enough later to pay for everyday bills and major expenses.

Make sure you have enough to pay the property taxes and insurance. If you don't, the lender can foreclose.

Complexities of reverse mortgages snag homeowners 05/30/14 [Last modified: Monday, June 2, 2014 3:40pm]
Photo reprints | Article reprints

© 2017 Tampa Bay Times


Join the discussion: Click to view comments, add yours

  1. Law firm's Russia ties prove nothing about Trump


    The statement

    "Law firm @POTUS used to show he has no ties to Russia was named Russia Law Firm of the Year for their extensive ties to Russia. Unreal."

    Sen. Chris Murphy, D-Conn., stands during a media availability on Capitol Hill, Monday, June 20, 2016 in Washington. A divided Senate blocked rival election-year plans to curb guns on Monday, eight days after the horror of Orlando's mass shooting intensified pressure on lawmakers to act but knotted them in gridlock anyway — even over restricting firearms for terrorists. (AP Photo/Alex Brandon)
  2. Pasco county lawyer disbarred for taking woman's money

    Real Estate

    NEW PORT RICHEY — The Florida Supreme Court on Thursday disbarred Pasco County attorney and former congressional candidate Constantine Kalogianis.

    The Florida Supreme Court on Thursday disbarred Pasco County attorney and former congressional candidate Constantine Kalogianis. 
[2016 booking photo via Pasco County Sheriff's Office]
  3. Rick Scott signs package of tax breaks

    State Roundup

    TALLAHASSEE — Gov. Rick Scott signed a tax cut package Thursday that — while vastly scaled back from what he wanted — eliminates the so-called "tampon tax" and offers tax holidays for back-to-school shoppers and Floridians preparing for hurricane season.

    Florida Governor Rick Scott signed a tax cut package that will cost state coffers $91.6 million during the upcoming year. [Joe Raedle | Getty Images]
  4. FBI probes fraudster's alleged church scam following Tampa Bay Times report

    Real Estate

    PLANT CITY — Once again, the FBI is investigating felon fraudster Victor Thomas Clavizzao.

    The FBI is investigating convicted mortgage fraudster Victor Thomas Clavizzao on new allegations following a Tampa Bay Times report.
[TImes file photo]

  5. Tampa Bay is ground-zero for assignment of benefits cases over broken auto glass


    When Rachel Thorpe tried to renew her auto insurance last year for her Toyta RAV4, she was stunned to see her monthly premium had nearly doubled to $600. The Sarasota driver was baffled since her only recent claim was over a broken windshield.

    Auto glass lawsuits filed by a third party (through what's known as assignment of benefits) are skyrocketing in Tampa Bay.
[Times file photo]