Make us your home page
Instagram

Buying back-to-school supplies online won't save you money, study finds

Buying school supplies in brick-and-mortar stores such as this Staples in Menlo Park, Calif., can be a better bargain than shopping online, according to a study by StellaService.

Associated Press (2010)

Buying school supplies in brick-and-mortar stores such as this Staples in Menlo Park, Calif., can be a better bargain than shopping online, according to a study by StellaService.

Remember the days when back-to-school shopping meant schlepping your cranky kids to Staples or Office Depot, only to find that the store was out of half of the stuff you needed and the other half was grievously overpriced? Thank goodness for the Internet, right?

Not so fast.

StellaService, an online customer service ratings startup, decided this year to study just how much money shoppers could save by purchasing school supplies on sites such as Walmart.com and Staples.com instead of going to the stores themselves. Their counterintuitive finding: none.

In fact, the firm's mystery shoppers spent significantly more to buy the same or comparable items online than they did offline. The average in-store bill for 13 items — including No. 2 pencils, a three-ring binder, a calculator and a glue stick — came to $31. Online, it was $53, including an average of $10 for shipping. That means the items would have been pricier on the Web even if shipping had been free.

Not only that, but some of the physical stores had a better selection than their digital counterparts did. Target.com, for instance, didn't offer many of the items on the list. Costco.com had items in stock but with minimum order requirements — such as three boxes of ballpoint pens — that drove up prices.

Finally, clunky and confusing online checkout processes meant that customers spent almost as much time completing their purchases online as they did standing in store checkout lines. (And, of course, those online orders generally take several days to arrive.)

What's going on here?

First, according to StellaService's chief executive officer, Jordy Leiser, the study's findings are genuine, as far as they go. Many office supply stores really do seem to offer better back-to-school deals offline than they do on their websites. The reasons aren't entirely clear. Maybe they see in-store discounts as loss leaders, or perhaps they just haven't mastered the online retail business model yet. Either way, it seems that in at least some cases, shoppers may be better off ducking into their local OfficeMax than going to OfficeMax.com.

Second, though, it would be a mistake to generalize from this study to conclude that offline shopping is superior to online shopping overall. Just because brick-and-mortar stores offer great back-to-school sales, that doesn't mean they're cheaper than their online counterparts for other items or at other times of the year.

And Leiser noted that the study compared only the online and offline experiences of specific stores that offered both. That means it did not include online retail giant Amazon.com.

It also means that it did not consider the relative ease of comparison shopping online. If you drive to Target, it's a big hassle to then drive to Office Depot to see if its prices are better. But in your Web browser, you can toggle between numerous sites with the click of a button.

Leiser said the proper takeaway from the study for consumers is simply that you can't assume that things will be cheaper just because you're buying them online — you have to be smart about it. And from a business perspective, the study may help explain why traditional retailers' websites have had a hard time making inroads against online-only competitors such as Amazon.

Buying back-to-school supplies online won't save you money, study finds 08/17/12 [Last modified: Friday, August 17, 2012 10:28pm]
Photo reprints | Article reprints

Copyright: For copyright information, please check with the distributor of this item, Slate.
    

Join the discussion: Click to view comments, add yours

Loading...
  1. Pinellas licensing board asks Sen. Jack Latvala for $500,000 loan

    Local Government

    The troubled Pinellas County agency that regulates contractors wants Sen. Jack Latvala to help it get a $500,000 lifeline from the state to stay afloat.

    State Sen . Jack Latvala, R- Clearwater, is being asked to help the Pinellas County Construction Licensing Board get $500,000 from the state so it can stay open beyond February.  [SCOTT KEELER   |   Times]
  2. In advertising, marketing diversity needs a boost in Tampa Bay, nationally

    Business

    TAMPA — Trimeka Benjamin was focused on a career in broadcast journalism when she entered Bethune-Cookman University.

    From left, Swim Digital marketing owner Trimeka Benjamin discusses the broad lack of diversity in advertising and marketing with 22 Squared copywriter Luke Sokolewicz, University of Tampa advertising/PR professor Jennifer Whelihan, Rumbo creative director George Zwierko and Nancy Vaughn of the White Book Agency. The group recently met at The Bunker in Ybor City.
  3. Tampa Club president seeks assessment fee from members

    News

    TAMPA — The president of the Tampa Club said he asked members last month to pay an additional assessment fee to provide "additional revenue." However, Ron Licata said Friday that the downtown business group is not in a dire financial situation.

    Ron Licata, president of the Tampa Club in downtown Tampa. [Tampa Club]
  4. Under Republican health care bill, Florida must make up $7.5 billion

    Markets

    If a Senate bill called the Better Care Reconciliation Act of 2017 becomes law, Florida's government would need to make up about $7.5 billion to maintain its current health care system. The bill, which is one of the Republican Party's long-promised answers to the Affordable Care Act imposes a cap on funding per enrollee …

    Florida would need to cover $7.5 billion to keep its health care program under the Republican-proposed Better Care Reconciliation Act of 2017.  [Times file photo]
  5. Amid U.S. real estate buying binge by foreign investors, Florida remains first choice

    Real Estate

    Foreign investment in U.S. residential real estate recently skyrocketed to a new high with nearly half of all foreign sales happening in Florida, California and Texas.

    A National Association of Realtors annual survey found record volume and activity by foreign buyers of U.S. real estate. Florida had the highest foreign investment activity, followed by California and Texas. [National Association of Realtors]