Make us your home page

Age discrimination: illegal, immoral and common

Suppose I'm a business that's interviewing people for a job opening. There are two finalists, one 27 years old, the other 52.

They have similar qualifications, albeit the older candidate has more experience. I hire the 27-year-old because that person will be around longer, and I'll get more from the investment I make in training.

That's a perfectly rational business decision.

It's also an illegal one.

Still, in these recent years of layoffs, downsizing and high unemployment, people in their 40s, 50s and 60s have learned that age discrimination is routine, regardless of its legality.

I've heard from dozens of readers who have gone unemployed for years because of their age. Often, more senior workers are the first to go in layoffs, and it's common to see them miss out on promotions. It breaks my heart. And it also angers me, because there's a law meant to prevent this — a law that lacks the teeth to be effective.

The Age Discrimination in Employment Act prohibits employment discrimination against anyone 40 or older. But according to Michael Harper of the Boston University School of Law, the act is nowhere near as effective as Title VII of the 1964 Civil Rights Act, which prohibits employment discrimination based on race, color, religion, gender and national origin.

In an article recently published in the Employee Rights and Employment Policy Journal, Harper wrote: "For no good policy-based reason, ADEA's prohibitions of age discrimination are more difficult and less attractive to enforce."

Furthermore, Congress and the Obama administration have done nothing to beef up the act, despite clear signs that age discrimination is on the rise. Harper cited in his article that 23,000 charges of age discrimination were filed with the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission in fiscal 2010, up by about 7,500 from 1997.

"I'm not criticizing any employer for trying to make money or for being rational," Harper said in an interview. "But we need enforceable regulations, because it's a collective action for our society. The society's interest is not in all cases served by what's rational for the individual employers."

I'd argue that many businesses' interests aren't served well either. By screening job candidates by age, a company wholly overlooks qualifications that might make a person a superior employee. Harper calls it "statistical discrimination," but I'll go ahead and call it short-sighted and dehumanizing.

Eric Matusewitch, former deputy director of the New York City Equal Employment Practices Commission and author of The Manager's Handbook on Employment Discrimination Law, noted that Title VII was amended in 1991 to include "mixed-motive cases." Basically, the plaintiff in a discrimination case only needed to show that his or her race or gender was part of the reason an employment decision was made.

But the Age Discrimination in Employment Act was not similarly amended. In fact, the act was weakened in 2009 by a U.S. Supreme Court ruling that said age discrimination had to be the reason for a contested employment decision.

"That decision barred many older employees from the courthouse door," Matusewitch said.

In his article, Harper calls for a number of reforms to the Age Discrimination in Employment Act that would make it at least as strong a deterrent to discrimination as Title VII. Those include allowing victims of age discrimination to sue for compensatory and punitive damages and making it easier to have age discrimination suits certified as class actions.

But would changes to this law make a difference, particularly when companies can discriminate based on age with relative stealth?

Matusewitch thinks so.

"Clearly employers would be put on notice that they have to be much more careful about their hiring decisions regarding older workers," he said.

Unfortunately, given that we have a Republican-led U.S. House of Representatives that bristles at the mere thought of additional business regulations, Matusewitch and Harper say swift changes to the age discrimination law are unlikely.

That's a shame. There is no reason age discrimination should be taken less seriously than any other form of bias. It's wrong morally, and it's stupid economically.

Companies may be cutting their bottom lines by pushing out older workers in favor of younger ones, but as more older workers remain unemployed, the cost to the country at large goes up.

Age discrimination: illegal, immoral and common 04/13/13 [Last modified: Tuesday, April 9, 2013 6:30pm]
Photo reprints | Article reprints

Copyright: For copyright information, please check with the distributor of this item, Tribune News Service.

Join the discussion: Click to view comments, add yours

  1. Water Street Tampa unveils video showing downtown's transformation


    TAMPA — Water Street Tampa, the sweeping, 50-plus acre redevelopment project in Tampa's urban core, has unveiled new images and video of what the downtown district will look like upon completion.

    Strategic Property Partners released a conceptual image of what the Tampa skyline will look like once its redevelopment of 50-plus acres of downtown will look like. [Photo courtesy of  of SPP]
  2. Florida ranks high for workplace equality between men and women

    Working Life

    When it comes to the workplace, Florida ranks fifth in terms of gender equality, a WalletHub study released Tuesday found.

    Florida ranks high in terms of equality between men and women in the workplace. Pictured is Sandra Murman, county commissioner in 2015, talking about the differences in pay between men and women. | [Times file photo]
  3. Treasury secretary's wife boasts of travel on government plane, touts high fashion


    U.S. Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin's wife, Louise Linton, boasted of flying on a government plane with her husband to Kentucky on Monday and then named the numerous fashion brands she wore on the trip in an unusual social media post that only became more bizarre minutes later.

    Steven Mnuchin and his then- financee Louise Linton watch as President Donald Trump speaks during Mnuchin's swearing-in ceremony as  treasury secretary in the Oval Office of the White House on Feb. 13. [Mandel Ngan | AFP via Getty Images]
  4. Ford, Chinese partner look at possible electric car venture


    BEIJING — Ford Motor Co. and a Chinese automaker said Tuesday they are looking into setting up a joint venture to develop and manufacture electric cars in China.

    In this April 23, 2016 photo, attendees take smartphone photos at a promotional event for Ford Motor Company ahead of the Auto China car show in Beijing. Ford Motor Co. announced an agreement Tuesday, Aug. 22, 2017 with a Chinese partner to look into forming a joint venture to develop and manufacture electric cars in China. [AP Photo/Mark Schiefelbein]
  5. Judge throws out $458,000 condo sale, says Clearwater attorney tricked bidders

    Real Estate

    CLEARWATER — Pinellas County Circuit Judge Jack St. Arnold on Monday threw out the $458,100 sale of a gulf-front condo because of what he called an "unscrupulous" and "conniving" scheme to trick bidders at a foreclosure auction.

    John Houde, left, whose Orlando copany was the high  bidder June 8 at the foreclosure auction of a Redington Beach condo, looks in the direction of Clearwater lawyer and real estate investor Roy C. Skelton, foreground,  during a hearing Monday before Pinellas County Circuit Judge Jack St. Arnold.  [DOUGLAS R. CLIFFORD   |   Times ]