Make us your home page

Today’s top headlines delivered to you daily.

(View our Privacy Policy)

Florida asks judge to end federal review of voting laws in five counties

TALLAHASSEE — Florida is challenging the federal government's long-standing authority to review and approve new voting laws in five counties in order to protect minority voters from discrimination.

The counties, which include Hillsborough and Monroe in the Florida Keys, find themselves at the center of a growing legal battle as the 2012 presidential election unfolds in the nation's largest battleground state.

Gov. Rick Scott's chief elections officer, Secretary of State Kurt Browning, asked a federal court Tuesday to remove the five counties from the voting law preclearance process after 40 years. The other counties are Collier, Hardee and Hendry.

At issue is a key provision of the Voting Rights Act of 1965, considered a centerpiece of historic civil rights legislation pushed by President Lyndon Johnson in an era when black voters, mostly in the South, routinely confronted poll taxes, literacy tests and other racially motivated barriers to voting.

The Republican-controlled Legislature last spring approved sweeping changes to Florida's election laws, and four of the most controversial provisions remain suspended in the five affected counties pending the federal review.

The provisions reduce the number of days of early voting from 14 to eight; require voters who move from county-to-county and who update their addresses at the polls to cast provisional ballots; require third-party groups that register voters to submit forms within 48 hours or face penalties; and reduce the validity of voters' signatures on initiative petitions from four years to two.

Critics, chiefly Democrats and voter advocacy groups, complained that the changes were designed to suppress Democratic turnout in a year when President Barack Obama might need a victory in Florida to secure his re-election.

In a statement, Browning acknowledged the need for laws to protect voters from discrimination. But he added: "There is no constitutional basis to single out five Florida counties . . . based solely on information from decades ago."

The state argues that the 40-year-old formula the federal government uses to determine pre-clearance is "arbitrary and irrational" and should no longer apply to Florida.

The state said the five affected Florida counties were subjected to federal preclearance in 1972 because less than half of the adults in the counties were registered to vote, they had a non-English speaking population of more than 5 percent and election materials were published only in English.

One of the groups fighting Florida in the courts reacted harshly to the state's legal maneuver.

"The governor's taxpayer-funded shenanigans continue," said Howard Simon, executive director of the ACLU of Florida. "(He is) now seeking to set aside landmark civil rights legislation that protects racial and language minorities in Florida."

By their latest action, Simon said, Scott and Browning prove that they would rather "fight to suppress the vote than follow landmark civil rights laws."

Dan McCrea, president of the Florida Voters Coalition, said it was "particularly shameful" that Scott and Browning would spend tax dollars to oppose a federal law designed to protect the rights of voters.

The state hired the Washington law firm Wiley Rein as special counsel in the case at a cost not to exceed $85,000 plus up to $10,000 in costs.

In the most recent case with similarities, the U.S. District Court in Washington last month rejected a claim brought by Shelby County, Ala., a jurisdiction also subject to the preclearance requirement.

Judge John Bates wrote in his 151-page decision that Congress extended the preclearance requirement in 2006 after hearing voluminous testimony that discriminatory voting practices continued to exist.

"This Court declines to overturn Congress' carefully considered judgment," Bates wrote.

Times researcher Caryn Baird contributed to this report. Steve Bousquet can be reached at or (850) 224-7263.

Time line: Florida's

changing election laws

May 19: Gov. Rick Scott signs House Bill 1355, a major overhaul of state election laws.

June 3: The ACLU and others file a lawsuit seeking to block implementation of the law until the federal government approves.

July: Secretary of State Kurt Browning asks a three-judge panel, instead of the U.S. Justice Department, to review the most controversial sections of the law.

Aug. 9: The Justice Department approves non-controversial parts of the law.

Oct. 11: The state asks the three-judge panel to remove the preclearance provision from five Florida counties.

Florida asks judge to end federal review of voting laws in five counties 10/11/11 [Last modified: Tuesday, October 11, 2011 10:58pm]
Photo reprints | Article reprints

© 2017 Tampa Bay Times


Join the discussion: Click to view comments, add yours

  1. Trigaux: Amid a record turnout, regional technology group spotlights successes, desire to do more


    ST. PETERSBURG — They came. They saw. They celebrated Tampa Bay's tech momentum.

    A record turnout event by the Tampa Bay Technology Forum, held May 24 at the Mahaffey Theater in St. Petersburg, featured a panel of area tech executives talking about the challenges encountered during their respective mergers and acquisitions. Show, from left to right, are: Gerard Purcell, senior vice president of global IT integration at Tech Data Corp.; John Kuemmel, chief information officer at Triad Retail Media, and Chris Cate, chief operating officer at Valpak. [Robert Trigaux, Times]
  2. Take 2: Some fear Tampa Bay Next transportation plan is TBX redux


    TAMPA — For many, Wednesday's regional transportation meeting was a dose of deja vu.

    The Florida Department of Transportation on Monday announced that it was renaming its controversial Tampa Bay Express plan, also known as TBX. The plan will now be known as Tampa Bay Next, or TBN. But the plan remains the same: spend $60 billion to add 90 miles of toll roads to bay area interstates that are currently free of tolls. [Florida Department of Transportation]
  3. Hailed as 'pioneers,' students from St. Petersburg High's first IB class return 30 years later


    ST. PETERSBURG — The students came from all over Pinellas County, some enduring hot bus rides to a school far from home. At first, they barely knew what to call themselves. All they knew was that they were in for a challenge.

    Class of 1987 alumni Devin Brown, from left, and D.J. Wagner, world history teacher Samuel Davis and 1987 graduate Milford Chavous chat at their table.
  4. Flower boxes on Fort Harrison in Clearwater to go, traffic pattern to stay


    I travel Fort Harrison Avenue in Clearwater often and I've noticed that the travel lanes have been rerouted to allow for what looks like flower boxes that have been painted by children. There are also a few spaces that push the travel lane to the center that have no boxes. Is this a permanent travel lane now? It …

  5. Palm Harbor boat dealer facing litany of complaints of bad deals


    PALM HARBOR — With an aging father sick in the hospital and a son just graduating high school, Andrew Kashella, in between jobs, knew what he had to do.

    A sign on a front window of Gulf Coast Boat Sales, 37517 Us Highway 19 N, in Palm Harbor, notifies people they are under restructuring  The Pinellas County Sheriff's Office has received 20 complaints against Gulf Coast Boat Sales in Palm Harbor. Complainants say they sold the shop their boats and never got paid and/or paid for boats they never received. Pinellas County Consumer Protection is leading the investigation.