Make us your home page

Today’s top headlines delivered to you daily.

(View our Privacy Policy)

Judge's 'improper' remarks lead to resentencing order in murder case

TAMPA — A state appeals court has ordered that a Seffner man serving a life prison term for a 2006 murder conviction be resentenced, ruling that his attorney failed to object to "improper" statements made by a Hillsborough Circuit judge.

In an opinion issued this week, Florida's 2nd District Court of Appeal found that Judge Ronald Ficarrotta "relied on improper factors" in his sentencing of Barry Johnson, then 23 years old. The court also decided that Johnson's attorney, Assistant Public Defender Charles Traina, was "deficient" in his counsel because he did not object to the judge's reasoning.

"We are unable to envision any tactical reason that trial counsel would have had for standing mute when the trial judge imposed the harshest sentence available based on improper sentencing factors," Appellate Judge Morris Silberman wrote.

At issue were remarks Ficarrotta made when he sentenced Johnson to life imprisonment in February 2006. The judge, who had also presided over Johnson's second-degree murder trial, rebuked Johnson because he had "shown absolutely no remorse to this day" in the shooting of 32-year-old Mark Franklin.

"You continue to deny your involvement and basically say this didn't even happen," Ficarrotta said, according to a transcript of the proceeding.

The judge's statements ran counter to the legal principle that a defendant's decision to maintain his innocence or testify on his own behalf should not be penalized by a heavier sentence, the appeals court found.

"A sentencing judge may not consider a defendant's claims of innocence or refusal to admit guilt when imposing sentence," Silberman wrote. "It is similarly improper for a judge to consider whether the defendant testified truthfully in imposing sentence. . . . In this case, the trial judge did both in violation of Johnson's due process rights."

The appeals court ordered that Johnson be resentenced by a different judge. The new judge will still be free to decide that he deserves life in prison, the maximum sentence for a second-degree murder conviction.

Ficarrotta declined to comment on the reversal of Johnson's sentence. Traina did not return calls for comment Friday.

A jury found that Johnson, who is now 30, was guilty of second-degree murder in Franklin's death and had used a firearm, leading to a mandatory minimum sentence of 25 years in state prison.

Prosecutors asserted that Johnson shot Franklin six times in a dispute over a car and $150.

Franklin's mother asked Ficarrotta to impose a life sentence. "I don't ever want him to walk the streets again to do the same thing to someone else's child like he did to my Mark," Joyce Franklin said in a statement submitted to the judge.

There are good reasons to prohibit judges from weighing a defendant's show of remorse or refusal to admit guilt when imposing a sentence, according to Jennifer Zedalis, director of trial practice at the University of Florida Levin College of Law.

Such considerations could lead to false displays of contrition by those seeking lighter punishment and have a "chilling effect" on defendants' constitutional right not to admit guilt.

"It's a slippery slope," Zedalis said. "I don't care how guilty somebody looks. You can't say you can consider remorse in this case but not in some other case. You have to have a bright line there."

In a dissenting opinion, Appellate Judge Chris Altenbernd said he did not agree that Traina was "ineffective" in representing Johnson and said Ficarrotta's comments were not inappropriate in light of the circumstances.

"At the sentencing hearing where the neighborhood needed closure, Mr. Johnson gave them nothing," Altenbernd wrote, adding that "the law of Florida that makes it a fundamental error for a trial judge to comment aloud about a defendant's visible lack of remorse in this context ought to be revisited by the Supreme Court."

Peter Jamison can be reached at [email protected] or (813) 226-3337. Follow him on Twitter @petejamison.

Judge's 'improper' remarks lead to resentencing order in murder case 09/06/13 [Last modified: Friday, September 6, 2013 11:34pm]
Photo reprints | Article reprints

© 2017 Tampa Bay Times


Join the discussion: Click to view comments, add yours

  1. Mother's testimony about toddler's death brings judge to tears


    TAMPA — Nayashia Williams woke up early on May 7, 2014, to the sound of her daughter calling for her. It was the last time the young mother's mornings would begin with a summons from Myla Presley, who couldn't yet climb over the mesh fencing around the playpen she used as a bed.

    Deandre Gilmore looks towards the gallery Tuesday in a Tampa courtroom. Gilmore is accused of killing the 19 month-old daughter of his girlfriend in 2014. He said the child fell while he was giving her a bath. [CHRIS URSO   |   Times]
  2. Speakers: Getting tough can't be only response to teen car thefts


    ST. PETERSBURG — Bob Dillinger remembers coming to Pinellas County as a legal intern in 1975. There were five major poverty zones in St. Petersburg.

  3. Internal White House documents allege manufacturing decline increases abortions, infertility and spousal abuse


    White House officials working on trade policy were alarmed last month when a top adviser to President Donald Trump circulated a two-page document that alleged a weakened manufacturing sector leads to an increase in abortion, spousal abuse, divorce and infertility, two people familiar with the matter told the …

  4. Black entrepreneur says city stiffing him on project after he endorsed Rick Baker


    ST. PETERSBURG — A prominent African-American resident says his endorsement of mayoral candidate Rick Baker has led city officials to freeze him out of a major construction project along the historic "Deuces" stretch of 22nd Street S.