Make us your home page

Today’s top headlines delivered to you daily.

(View our Privacy Policy)

TV cameras should be allowed in the U.S. Supreme Court

Wouldn't it be something to see your U.S. Supreme Court at work?

To watch justices deal with some of the biggest questions of the day, like same-sex marriage, campaign finance, or whether juveniles should get life in prison if they didn't kill anyone?

How about being able to listen in as they hear cases that speak volumes about where we are in the world right now — like one about the rights of grieving families of the military dead vs. those of lunatic fringe demonstrators who show up to funerals with signs that say "Thank God for dead soldiers"? To witness decisions that determine who we are as a country?

Hey, looks like we might agree on this one. A recent poll says more than 60 percent of voters believe televising Supreme Court proceedings would be "good for democracy." Even a majority of Democrats and a majority of Republicans think so, if you can believe that.

But our highest court has resisted exposure to the sort of sunshine that could put its proceedings on C-SPAN and in your living room. Oft-cited reasons are the dignity of the court, the privacy of justices, the desire to stay above politics. (And I bet the grumpiest among them isn't feeling too friendly about exposure after President Barack Obama did a big with-all-due-respect on them about a controversial campaign finance decision that could "open the floodgates for special interests." Boy, you go to that big State of the Union party thinking everything's cool, and the president goes and calls you out.)

On the question of "dignity": Some bring up the infamous O.J. Simpson trial, a red herring and a scary one, given how that particular media mess spiraled off into la-la land. But the Supreme Court includes neither juries nor witnesses that might be bedazzled by the glare of such media attention.

Me, I'd argue on the side of letting the public see what goes on in the public's courtrooms, period.

Cameras are not allowed in our federal courthouse, which pretty much leaves local TV on the courthouse steps. This does not help show the important matters that play out inside those tall, imperious walls — why cases get dismissed, who goes to jail and who doesn't, why one guy gets life and another probation, whether on a given day the justice system actually involved justice. This does not inspire trust.

We've gotten an eyeful of sunshine around here lately, at least in the political world. We the people were able to watch — on the government's own public access TV channel, even! — as Hillsborough commissioners began unsnarling the tangle of whether to fire top employees involved in an e-mail scandal (among other alleged transgressions.) And yes, it was like seeing sausage made.

But in the end, access makes for better government. People got to see how their commissioners behaved. Maybe they got to thinking about whether their county indeed needs a mayor, having seen firsthand how things work, or how they don't.

Question, then: How do you understand what's going on when it's so hard to see inside?

Sen. Arlen Specter has introduced a resolution for cameras in the courtroom. Even more trust-inspiring would be justices heeding voices that call for openness, and letting the sunshine in.

Good for democracy? As it turns out, most of us already think so.

TV cameras should be allowed in the U.S. Supreme Court 03/18/10 [Last modified: Thursday, March 18, 2010 7:42pm]
Photo reprints | Article reprints

© 2017 Tampa Bay Times


Join the discussion: Click to view comments, add yours

  1. Rays late-night bullpen shuffle: Alvarado, Pruitt down; Kolarek up


    The Rays shuffled their bullpen again after Tuesday's game, sending down struggling LHP Jose Alvarado along with RHP Austin Pruitt to Triple-A Durham, and turning next to LHP Adam Kolarek, who will make his major-league debut at age 28,

  2. Tampa Bay Times honored for top investigative story in Gerald Loeb annual business awards


    The Tampa Bay Times was a co-winner in the investigative category for one of the highest honors in business journalism.

    Tampa Bay Times current and former staff writers William R. Levesque, Nathaniel Lash and Anthony Cormier were honored in the investigative category for their coverage of "Allegiant Air" in the 60th Anniversary Gerald Loeb Awards for Distinguished Business and Financial Journalism. 


  3. Pasco woman gives birth to child fathered by 11 year old, deputies say


    A Port Richey woman was arrested Tuesday, nearly three years after deputies say she gave birth to a child fathered by an 11-year-old boy.

    Marissa Mowry, 25, was arrested Tuesday on charges she sexually assaulted an 11-year-old and gave birth to his child. [Hillsborough County Sheriff's Office]
  4. For good of the Rays, Tim Beckham should embrace move to second

    The Heater

    PITTSBURGH — The acquisition of slick-fielding shortstop Adeiny Hechavarria said a lot of things, most notably that the Rays are serious about making in-season moves to bolster their chances to make the playoffs, with a reliever, or two, next on the shopping list.

    PITTSBURGH, PA - JUNE 27:  Tim Beckham #1 of the Tampa Bay Rays celebrates with teammates after scoring during the eighth inning against the Pittsburgh Pirates at PNC Park on June 27, 2017 in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. (Photo by Joe Sargent/Getty Images) 700011399
  5. St. Petersburg showdown: Kriseman faces Baker for first time tonight at the Rev. Louis Murphy Sr.'s church

    Local Government

    A standing-room-only crowd packed a Midtown church banquet hall Tuesday to witness the first face-off between Mayor Rick Kriseman and former mayor Rick Baker in what is a watershed mayoral contest in the city's history.

    Former Mayor Rick Baker, left, is challenging incumbent Mayor Rick Kriseman, right, to become St. Petersburg mayor.