Make us your home page

Today’s top headlines delivered to you daily.

(View our Privacy Policy)

Why only 6 on the Zimmerman jury?

With all eyes on Central Florida for the George Zimmerman trial and its aftermath, one question keeps surfacing: Why are juries made up of just six people?

Throughout most of the country, 12 jurors determine the guilt or innocence of suspects in felony trials.

But in Florida and a handful of other states, only six jurors are seated in the majority of felony cases — even in some of the most violent and serious crimes.

This element of Florida's criminal-justice system was highlighted during Zimmerman's trial and after his acquittal on second-degree-murder charges in the shooting death of 17-year-old Trayvon Martin on Feb. 26, 2012.

When the all-female jury was chosen, critics pointed out the lack of diversity on the panel.

And now, in the wake of Zimmerman's acquittal, U.S. Rep. Randolph Bracy, D-Fla., is calling for state leaders to change Florida's law so that in felony trials, juries must have 12 members.

"It's more of a jury of one's peers when you have more jurors," said Bracy. "I think that is better for the people of Florida and for our criminal-justice system in general."

Legal experts and researchers back up Bracy's premise: that six-member juries are less diverse than 12-member panels, said Susan Rozelle, a law professor at Stetson University College of Law.

Defendants are constitutionally entitled to a fair cross-section of potential jurors, but that doesn't mean the people who are actually seated for the jury have to demonstrate that diversity, she said.

In Zimmerman's trial, all of the jurors were women — five of them white — and they ranged in age from 20s to 60s. Rozelle said even if the jury pool is ethnically diverse, a smaller panel lessens the likelihood of having other kinds of diversity.

Rozelle said if every juror on any panel has the same background, the same life experiences, and are the same demographic, they are likely going to view the facts the same. They may not see an alternative perspective because it simply didn't occur to them and they have no one to point it out, she said.

In some cases, the law professor said, "everyone agrees what the facts are, but they disagree bitterly on what those facts mean. If the trial is about truth seeking, it helps to have all possible interpretations of those facts considered."

In the days since Zimmerman was acquitted, the Seminole County jurors who found him not guilty have faced sharp criticism from legal observers and others. Some have questioned why there were no blacks on the jury because there were several in the pool that was culled from several hundred to 40 after a week of jury selection.

After one juror, known only as B-37, spoke out on CNN last week, saying race was not a consideration in deliberations, some critics said the homogeny of the panel led to a lack of empathy for the dead teenager.

Benjamin Crump, an attorney for Trayvon's parents, Sybrina Fulton and Tracy Martin, said it more pointedly: "(Juror B-37) never, ever saw Sybrina Fulton's child, Trayvon, as her child," Crump told CNN's Anderson Cooper. "She never saw that that could have been her child."

In addition to added diversity and range of experience, 12-member juries are more likely to deadlock, or "hang," than smaller panels, some experts say.

But researchers say further studies need to be conducted to determine other differences between six- and 12-member juries.

"The jury is really out on if it is more efficient or not" to have a smaller panel, said Mark Summers, a law professor at Barry University and former federal prosecutor and defense attorney.

Summers noted that jurors only have to come back with a simple guilty or not guilty verdict. They do not need to explain why or how they reached that conclusion.

And that poses a significant question, he says. Without knowing why a jury made the decision it did, "How do you say that your trial was unfair based on the fact you had a six-person jury?"

Why only 6 on the Zimmerman jury? 07/23/13 [Last modified: Tuesday, July 23, 2013 11:34am]
Photo reprints | Article reprints

Copyright: For copyright information, please check with the distributor of this item, Tribune News Service.

Join the discussion: Click to view comments, add yours

  1. Lacking support, lobbying ordinance gets no hearing in Hernando

    Local Government

    BROOKSVILLE — A push to publicly identify people who lobby top county officials was rejected by a majority of the Hernando County Commission this week when commissioners decided to pull a proposed lobbying ordinance from the agenda.

    Commissioner Steve Champion said there was not a consensus to bring a lobbying ordinance forward so the item should not have been placed on the agenda.
  2. 80 books disappear from classroom that sheltered Irma evacuees


    DUNEDIN — When Martha Hereford-Cothron returned to her classroom at Dunedin Highland Middle School on Monday morning, her heart sank as her eyes scanned the room and landed on a white bookshelf, empty except for a broken DVD player and a thermal blanket.

    Gone from this shelf at Dunedin Highland Middle School were some 80 books and several board games in the classroom of teacher Martha Hereford-Cothron. The items disappeared after the classroom was used to shelter evacuees from Hurricane Irma. [Photo courtesy of Martha Hereford-Cothron]
  3. Lanes closed after pedestrian fatally struck by semi-tractor on U.S. 19 in Clearwater


    CLEARWATER — Southbound lanes on U.S. 19 were closed early Wednesday morning after a pedestrian was fatally struck by a semi-trailer.

  4. [National Hurricane Center]
  5. Manhattan Casino controversy resumes after taking a break for Irma

    Local Government

    ST. PETERSBURG — Mayor Rick Kriseman's administration has once again found itself defending its controversial choice of the Callaloo Group to open a "Floribbean" restaurant in the historic but currently empty Manhattan Casino.