Make us your home page

Today’s top headlines delivered to you daily.

(View our Privacy Policy)

'Don't ask, don't tell' repeal blocked in Senate

WASHINGTON —The Senate voted Tuesday against taking up a major military bill containing a provision that would allow the repeal of the "don't ask, don't tell" policy, disappointing advocates of allowing gay Americans to serve openly in the armed forces but leaving open the likelihood of another vote this year.

Democrats thought this was their best chance to undo the 17-year-old measure after President Barack Obama had won the support of Defense Secretary Robert Gates and other military leaders to get rid of it.

But Republicans objected that Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev., had attached several politically motivated proposals to the measure ahead of the fall elections.

Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., who led the charge against repeal, called Reid's plan a "blatant and cynical" political ploy aimed at galvanizing Democratic voters for the midterm elections.

The high-profile failure left some advocates of repeal feeling burned and blaming the White House and congressional Democrats for not acting sooner.

"The Democrats have been against 'don't ask, don't tell' for more than a decade and why we allowed this law to remain in effect for another two years is beyond me," said Richard Soccarides, a former gay rights adviser to President Bill Clinton. "The Washington-based gay rights groups made a decision early on that they were better off going along with the president's time line and that right now that looks like a serious miscalculation."

The House has already approved legislation that would allow the Pentagon to rescind the policy, while a legal fight is advancing in the federal courts.

The outcome, at a time when Congress is increasingly paralyzed by the partisan fury of the midterm elections, was more a result of a dispute between Democrats and Republicans over legislative process than a straightforward referendum on whether to allow gay, lesbian and bisexual soldiers to serve openly.

One Republican, Susan Collins of Maine, said she voted to block the bill for procedural reasons despite supporting the provision to allow repeal of the "don't ask, don't tell" policy. Other Republicans have suggested they might be open to supporting the change later in the year, once the military has finished the study of the likely effects of the proposed policy shift.

The vote was 56-43, with Democrats falling short of the 60 votes needed to overcome a filibuster.

Both Arkansas Democrats, Blanche Lincoln and Mark Pryor, sided with all 40 Republicans present in opposing debate. Reid switched his vote to no at the last minute, a procedural maneuver that allowed him to call for a revote.

Supporters of gay rights said they were deeply disappointed by the vote.

Lawmakers in favor of repealing "don't ask, don't tell" made emotional appeals on the Senate floor.

"It ought to go," said Sen. Joseph I. Lieberman, I-Conn. "It's un-American. It's inconsistent with our best values of equal opportunity, who can get the job done, not what your private life is about."

Lieberman and others said they would continue the fight.

Congress has approved the annual Pentagon bill for 48 consecutive years, and it seems likely that the measure will be brought up again after the election in the relatively calmer — if somewhat unpredictable — atmosphere of a lame-duck session.

The repeal language might be easier to pass in the Senate after Dec. 1, when a Pentagon study on the effects of ending the policy is due. McCain, the senior Republican on the Armed Services Committee, has said it would be premature to vote before the results of that study were known.

As it stands, the Senate measure would not allow repeal of the policy until after the study was completed and Obama and top military commanders certified that ending "don't ask, don't tell" would not harm morale or impede the readiness of troops.

Democrats immediately sought to blame Republicans for obstructing the repeal of "don't ask, don't tell."

The language allowing the end of "don't ask, don't tell" was approved last spring by the Senate Armed Services Committee, and at the time won the support of one Republican, Collins.

In addition, at least one Democrat who opposed the repeal language, Sen. Jim Webb of Virginia, had said he would not vote against the overall bill simply to maintain the "don't ask don't tell" policy. Webb voted Tuesday to move the bill forward.

Although the Obama administration strongly supports repealing the policy, the White House has already threatened to veto the House version of the military bill over several provisions it opposes, including authorization of $485 million for construction of an extra engine for the F-35 joint strike fighter. The administration believes that the extra engine is wasteful.

But substantive policy disagreements were a secondary consideration Tuesday in the skirmishing on the Senate floor. Collins criticized Reid for politicizing the military measure.

"There are many controversial issues in this bill," Collins said in a floor speech. "They deserve to have a civil, fair and open debate on the Senate floor, and that is why I am so disappointed that rather than allowing full and open debate and the opportunity for amendments from both sides of the aisle, the majority leader apparently intends to shut down the debate and exclude Republicans from offering a number of amendments."

With time running short before lawmakers leave Washington to turn their full attention to the fall campaign, Senate Democrats said they planned to hold another vote on a bill to toughen disclosure requirements on campaign spending by corporations and other private groups.

The Democrats have proposed a bill to respond to a recent Supreme Court ruling that allows mostly unfettered campaign spending by corporations. Republicans blocked the bill in July and are expected to do so again.

Information from the Washington Post was used in this report

'Don't ask, don't tell' repeal blocked in Senate 09/21/10 [Last modified: Wednesday, September 22, 2010 7:16am]
Photo reprints | Article reprints

Copyright: For copyright information, please check with the distributor of this item, New York Times.

Join the discussion: Click to view comments, add yours

  1. Woman convicted in murder of 18-year-old with cerebral palsy gets lighter term


    TAMPA — Linda Bonck, a 90-pound Chamberlain High School senior with cerebral palsy, lived near Tampa's Lowry Park. She struggled to walk and talk but was known for being friendly and trusting of strangers until she vanished one day in 1992.

    Georgia Miller, 39, was convicted for the 1992 murder of Linda Bonck, an 18-year-old Chamberlain High School student who had cerebral palsy. Originally sentenced to life in prison, Miller was resentenced Wednesday to 65 years, the result of U.S. and Florida Supreme Court decisions that found it unconstitutional to sentence juveniles to life. With gain time, Miller will be released from prison in the next six years. [Florida Department of Corrections]
  2. Boynton Beach woman arrested on DUI, child abuse charges


    A Boynton Beach woman was arrested Saturday and faces DUI and child abuse charges after she blew a .200 on a breath test with an unbuckled child in the backseat, according to the Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office.

    Brandy Lerma, 31 of Boynton Beach, was arrested on DUI and child abuse charges on Saturday. [Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office]
  3. Editorial: Why can't Hillsborough commissioners move Confederate monument?


    The violence in Charlottesville, Va., crystallized for much of the nation the danger of refusing to address painful symbols of the past. But not so in Hillsborough County, where the County Commission on Wednesday reversed itself yet again and left open the possibility of leaving a Confederate monument outside the …

  4. Former WTSP employee sues station's parent companies for gender discrimination


    A former director at WTSP-Ch. 10 has sued the station's parent companies, claiming she was the victim of gender discrimination.

  5. Editorial: UF should reconsider denying white nationalist's request to speak


    University of Florida president Kent Fuchs understandably cited security concerns Wednesday in denying white nationalist Richard Spencer's application to speak next month on campus. But those security concerns could be addressed, and they should not stamp out free speech at a public university that aspires to be great. …

    The University of Florida, citing security concerns, has denied white nationalist Richard Spencer’s application to speak on campus in September.