Fill out this form to email this article to a friend
We were unable to send your email.
Click here to try again.
Pinellas School Board moves ahead in search for superintendent
By
Thomas C. Tobin, Times Staff Writer
In print: Wednesday, May 7, 2008
The Pinellas School Board saw progress on two major fronts Tuesday, pushing ahead with a nationwide superintendent search and hearing from finance officials that it might be possible to reduce or eliminate proposed pay cuts for all district employees. At a workshop, the board informally decided on a four-month search to replace outgoing superintendent Clayton Wilcox. The district's new top executive will be offered a salary of between $200,000 and $240,000 and an initial contract of three years. Wilcox's salary this year is $204,000. The board plans to select five finalists, invite them for a late-August visit that would include school tours and make a selection by late September. The process calls for public input. Also Tuesday, board members quickly agreed on a salary increase for deputy superintendent Julie Janssen, who will assume a larger role as interim superintendent after Wilcox leaves June 2 for a private sector job. Janssen's salary will rise from $131,000 to $185,000. A 4-3 board majority appears inclined to allow Janssen to apply for the permanent job. The board will take formal votes Tuesday on Janssen's appointment, her salary and other matters related to Wilcox's departure, including hiring a search consultant. The consultant will be Wayne Blanton, executive director of the Florida School Boards Association, who has conducted about 70 superintendent searches. "When you get to your top five (finalists), every one of them can run your school system," Blanton told the board. He also told them it was likely that allowing the interim superintendent to apply for the permanent job would likely reduce the pool of candidates because many will think the interim has an advantage. Like the other 16,000 employees in the district, Janssen stands to take a pay cut if one is approved by the board. Wilcox last week proposed a 2 percent pay cut for about 14,000 employees, most of them teachers. The remaining 2,000 employees — bus drivers, maintenance workers, cafeteria staffers and office employees — were to have their hours reduced by 30 minutes a day, resulting in a 6.25 percent pay cut. But Tuesday brought news that the new worst-case scenario is an across-the-board 1.5 percent pay cut for all 16,000 district employees. What changed? A call by board members to have all employees share the pain equally. In addition, Wilcox and his finance staff now recommend cutting deeper into the district's reserves by $4.8-million. They also said they learned that the system's property and casualty insurance will cost $1.1-million less than anticipated. Together, those developments generate another $6-million that could be spent on salaries. Put another way, last week's $43-million budget deficit now stands at about $37-million. The downside: Lanse Johansen, the district's chief business officer, said cutting into reserves would leave the district with a contingency fund of about $14-million, or 1.5 percent of the operating budget — a figure he described as perilously low. "That's the lowest I can recommend," Johansen told the board. Officials also proposed ways to make the pay cut even smaller or eliminate it by increasing health insurance premiums paid by employees. The district faces an $11-million increase in insurance premiums for 2008-09. The current budget proposes that the district shoulder the entire increase as it has in the past and not pass it on to employees. But what if the district passed on a portion of the premium increase in exchange for making the pay cut less severe? Or what if employees shouldered the entire premium increase in exchange for a freeze in pay? The board received a worksheet showing how increasing health premiums would affect different employees. One example: If the district froze pay at this year's levels, an employee making $40,000 a year who pays insurance premiums for herself only would shoulder an increase in premiums of $440 a year. On the other hand, the same employee would lose $600 in salary if the district cut pay by 1.5 percent and did not pass on the insurance increase to employees. Kim Black, president of the Pinellas Classroom Teachers Association, said the union has not agreed to such a tradeoff. "We do need to continue this discussion, and we do need to look at what benefits the majority of employees," she said. "We just ask the employees to hang with us and to remain calm and focus on the remainder of this year and let us work on the bargaining process." Thomas C. Tobin can be reached at tobin@sptimes.com or (727) 893-8923.
[Last modified: May 13, 2008 09:36 AM]
Comments on this article
|
by Kawanis
|
May 13, 2008 9:36 AM
|
|
Pick Joe he's Awsome
|
|
by Marty S.
|
May 9, 2008 11:15 AM
|
|
Isn't a contingency fund for just this sort of contingency?
|
|
by mad dad
|
May 9, 2008 11:07 AM
|
|
It would seem that we are here, once again, at the end of the school year hearing the sky is falling next year. As usual, the people who take care of, shape, and educate our children are supposed to take the brunt of the “hit”.
|
|
by k
|
May 7, 2008 4:28 PM
|
|
Want to save some money? No increase for interim Supt. and no outside search -hire from within someone who knows our county and employees. Look what the last search got us - a mess and a Supt. who was just in it for the money and moving on
|
|
by Concerned Citizen
|
May 7, 2008 1:56 PM
|
|
How about reducing the number of days principals and AP's are working. Do we need staff in the schools over the summer? An increase in pay for interim Super? $50,000. is quite the bonus!Find the money to pay our teachers! They deserve it!
|
|
by Maarisia
|
May 7, 2008 1:03 PM
|
|
Nat'l. search will be futile only because no one in their right mind would want to come here. I would be suspicious of anyone applying. why come to a district w/ so many problems if you are talented enuf to get something better
|
|
by Vickie
|
May 7, 2008 12:08 PM
|
|
The new incoming Superintendent is getting
a pay increase from $131,000 to $185,000.
It's stated that she will take a pay cut also.
Which is it? Cut or increase?
You do the math.
|
|
by Shay
|
May 7, 2008 12:02 PM
|
|
HIRE JOHN LEANES----He is a true leader!!
|
|
by Vickie
|
May 7, 2008 12:01 PM
|
|
The School board should start
pay cuts at the top (Superintendent on down).
Why cut the pay of the teachers, who make the least & are far more
important in our students education?
Leave our teachers be & revise your budget
fro
|
|
by Largo Teacher
|
May 7, 2008 11:51 AM
|
|
OK-We don't cut pay but we do raise insurance premiums. How is that not considered a paycut??? If we are in such a shortage, perhaps we could save money by hiring from within the district instead of paying for a nation-wide search for
|
|
by Mud
|
May 7, 2008 11:50 AM
|
|
Good Old Girl? Spend $$$ hiring a consultant from a FL School Boards Assciation, when the President of the NATIONAL School Boards Association is on your board? They live in their own little world of reserved parking and retreats.
|
|
by support
|
May 7, 2008 11:38 AM
|
|
1.1million oversight. How much more have they missed? segways for all!!
|
|