Make us your home page
Instagram

Today’s top headlines delivered to you daily.

(View our Privacy Policy)

Here's how Foreman can really lead on school impact fees

School Board member Matt Foreman is upset that the County Commission used $40,000 of school and county tax money on a report on impact fees when commissioners were dead set against the fees.

WILL VRAGOVIC | Times

School Board member Matt Foreman is upset that the County Commission used $40,000 of school and county tax money on a report on impact fees when commissioners were dead set against the fees.

Let's give Hernando County School Board member Matt Foreman the benefit of the doubt.

Let's assume that he wasn't just trying to sound like he cared about school impact fees. Let us, for the moment, believe that he really wants to lead on this issue and fell a little short.

I'm talking about the board's workshop last week when Foreman unexpectedly blasted the four-member majority of the County Commission for its dismissive stance on this much-needed source of funding for schools.

Foreman doesn't have a problem with the stance itself. He can't; he's more dismissive of impact fees than anyone.

No, he just doesn't like the way it came about.

He doesn't like that commissioners previously suggested they might actually consider imposing the fees if they had an up-to-date cost study — when, really, they were dead set against the fees all along.

He's mad that the commission wasted nearly $40,000 of school and county money that paid for this report, mad that it was "playing politics with educational dollars." Finally, Foreman said, the commission owes the people a real explanation for its vote and not just a bunch of excuses that "lacked merit."

Unfortunately, Foreman's the champ when it comes to weak excuses for opposing impact fees. He thinks they're unfair always, no matter what, which puts him at odds with the state Legislature that created this system, with the courts that upheld it, with nearby counties that almost all charge these fees to help pay for new schools.

He's further behind on this issue than the backward-looking commission majority — further, even, than county builders who said they'd be happy to take on the burden of impact fees once their sick industry gets a little better.

So, to be a leader he needs to dump this indefensible position. Then he needs to go before the board when it takes a final vote on school impact fees on March 11, because that's the good news here: It's not too late.

Specifically, Foreman needs to provide what the School Board sadly lacked the last time this issue came up — political heat.

Point out what the commission is really doing — favoring a politically connected industry over education.

Call commissioners out on their claim that they just want to give builders a little more time, and do this by presenting a compromise that allows for charging an increasing percentage of the newly calculated fees tied to building permits until the housing market has recovered.

Show that, by relieving the builders of their burden, the commission is shifting it to the rest of us. That half-cent school sales tax that builders say they are okay with? Without impact fees, the real price would be more like a full cent on every dollar.

Get up before the commission and tell them exactly why their excuses don't cut it. Explain, for example, that it's perfectly acceptable that impact fees pay off debts on existing schools, because that's where the children of new home buyers will be taught — in available space.

Finally, Foreman needs to shame the commission for holding on to the very pattern that has made this county such a hard sell for builders: constructing too many houses and not enough community.

Because there is one good thing that came out of Foreman's high-minded, forceful speech. He proved he can lead if he really wants to.

Here's how Foreman can really lead on school impact fees 02/25/14 [Last modified: Tuesday, February 25, 2014 6:36pm]
Photo reprints | Article reprints

© 2017 Tampa Bay Times

    

Join the discussion: Click to view comments, add yours

Loading...
  1. Review: Mark Bowden's 'Hue 1968' a gripping, and timely, history

    Books

    More than 40 years after it ended, America's war in Vietnam is still contentious, still misunderstood, and fast slipping into the fog of history.

     On Feb. 15, 1968, U.S. Marines carry out an assault on Dong Ba Tower in Hue, South Vietnam. In the battle for the tower, six men died and 50 were wounded.
  2. Florida education news: Athletic trainers, signing bonuses, student vaccinations and more

    Blogs

    SAFETY FIRST: Pasco County school district leaders decide to retain high school athletic trainers, which had been slated for elimination, amid pleas from …

  3. Rays morning after: Why Alex Cobb was out of the game and Alex Colome was in

    Blogs

    Alex Cobb obviously did a really good job pitching the first eight innings for the Rays on Tuesday.

  4. Police commander among 6 charged in deadly 1989 UK soccer deaths

    World

    LONDON — British prosecutors charged six people Wednesday in the 1989 Hillsborough stadium disaster where 96 soccer fans were crushed to death.

    Police, stewards and supporters tend and care for wounded supporters on the pitch at Hillsborough Stadium, in Sheffield, England, on April 15, 1989. British prosecutors on Wednesday June 28, 2017, are set to announce whether they plan to lay charges in the deaths of 96 people in the Hillsborough stadium crush _ one of Britain's worst-ever sporting disasters. [Associated Press]
  5. Supreme Court term ended much different than it began

    Courts

    BC-US—Supreme Court, 1st Ld-Writethru,899

    AP Photo WX109

    People visit the Supreme Court in Washington, Monday, June 26, 2017, as justices issued their final rulings for the term, in Washington.  The Supreme Court began its term nine months ago with Merrick Garland nominated to the bench, Hillary Clinton favored to be the next president, and the court poised to be controlled by Democratic appointees for the first time in 50 years.  Things looked very different when the justices wrapped up their work this week. [Associated Press]