Make us your home page
Instagram

Today’s top headlines delivered to you daily.

(View our Privacy Policy)

Procedural issue delays Hernando School Board's reconsideration of impact fees

BROOKSVILLE — Look no further than Tuesday night's Hernando County School Board meeting to see just how controversial impact fees have become in the county.

The issue nearly derailed the entire meeting.

Board members initially were slated to vote on a measure to pay for an educational facilities impact fee study — something that is needed to determine the appropriate fees.

The one-time levies on new construction help offset the cost of future growth, but are currently suspended. Hernando County commissioners have made it clear they won't bring back the education fee without a new study.

But last week, the item was removed from the School Board's agenda.

Some board members were not happy.

"As a matter of business," said board member John Sweeney, "I would like greater notification the next time something is going to be removed of this importance."

Here's what happened:

After seeing the agenda, chairman Matt Foreman asked superintendent Bryan Blavatt to remove the item because the School Board had already voted on the funding issue at its December meeting.

At that meeting, the board tied 2-2, and therefore did not provide funding for the study. Board member Cynthia Moore, who supports impact fees, was absent.

Foreman and vice chairman Gus Guadagnino both voted against funding the study.

As a result of the vote, Foreman said, it was inappropriate for Blavatt to be the one to put it back on the agenda.

Blavatt agreed.

"They voted 2-2, and it was rejected to do the study," he said. "For me to have the agenda item back on the January agenda was my mistake."

Foreman, after consulting with the board's attorney, said a board member will have to make a motion during a meeting to bring the item back before the board. It would then appear on the follow meeting's agenda, he said.

Because no board member made that motion Tuesday, he said it will not appear on board's next agenda on Feb. 5.

"It just needs to be done appropriately," Foreman said. "I just want things done right."

Tuesday's delay didn't go over well with other board members.

"Each day is precious here," said board member Dianne Bonfield. "It is very important, in my opinion, that we move forward as quickly as possible with a full board."

Sweeney was more blunt, saying, "My point is let's not play politics with this."

Foreman said he wasn't.

"The information is going to be presented," he said. "There's just a matter of procedure that has to be followed. I'm a little bit of a stickler for it, as the superintendent will tell you."

The issue came to a head when board members were asked to approve Tuesday night's agenda, a formality that normally takes only a few seconds.

At first, there weren't enough votes to bring it to a vote.

The small crowd on hand murmured.

The agenda was then voted down 3-2.

"If nobody wants to have a meeting, I guess we can come back in a couple of weeks and come back and do this again," Foreman said.

Sweeney responded: "I think that's a pretty big leap," he said. "Of course we're here; we wanted a meeting. We just don't want to have agendas revised and changed without our notification."

Eventually, the agenda was approved 4-1.

"I don't mean to make this a contentious issue, and I don't mean to make it so we don't have the rest of the board meeting because there are items on here that are very important," Bonfield said. "But also, in my opinion, it's very important that we go ahead with the study."

She cited the roughly $1 million in revenue the district has lost since impact fees have been suspended or discounted for the past three years.

She said not having the impact fee money is not in the best interest of schoolchildren.

"To me, the best interests of the children of this county are never to be educated in classrooms with close to 40 kids in them and two teachers," she said. "Never again. And that's what we could be looking at down the line if we don't do everything we can at this point in time to make certain that our capital funds remain healthy."

Danny Valentine can be reached at dvalentine@tampabay.com or (352) 848-1432. Tweet him @HernandoTimes.

Procedural issue delays Hernando School Board's reconsideration of impact fees 01/23/13 [Last modified: Wednesday, January 23, 2013 6:07pm]
Photo reprints | Article reprints

© 2017 Tampa Bay Times

    

Join the discussion: Click to view comments, add yours

Loading...
  1. Rays make Hechavarria trade official

    Blogs

    Here is the release from the team ...

     

  2. Jones: Will Tampa Bay hit a Hall of Fame dry spell now?

    Lightning Strikes

    Marty St. Louis may lack the Hall of Fame stats, but two scoring titles, an MVP award and clutch goals should count for a lot. (Dirk Shadd, Times)
  3. SeaWorld shares drop Monday to 2017 low after disclosure of federal subpoena

    Tourism

    The Orlando parent company of SeaWorld and Busch Gardens theme parks saw its stock drop 3.5 percent Monday to $15.10, its lowest price of this year.

    Killer whales perform at Shamu Stadium at SeaWorld in Orlando in 2011, before public pressure was placed on the theme park company to curtail its orca shows.SeaWorld has since announced an end to the traditional killer whale entertainment  at its theme parks. [AP Photo/Phelan M. Ebenhack]
  4. Update: Scientology cancels planned mock FBI raid on downtown building

    Special Topics

    CLEARWATER — The Church of Scientology planned to film a mock FBI raid on a downtown building Monday afternoon, but the actors and cameras never showed up to the location disclosed to the city.

    According to Clearwater Police, the Church of Scientology plans to hold a mock FBI raid at 3 p.m. Monday at this vacant building at 305 N Fort Harrison Ave. Police announced the raid in advance to alert the public. They said they did not know the reason for the event. [Google Earch image]
  5. Support for gay marriage surges, even among groups once wary

    Human Interest

    NEW YORK — In the two years since same-sex marriage was legalized nationwide, support for it has surged even among groups that recently were broadly opposed, according to a new national survey.

    People gather in Washington's Lafayette Park to see the White House lit up in rainbow colors on June 26, 2015, the day the Supreme Court ruled that same-sex marriage legal. In the two years since same-sex marriage was legalized nationwide, support for it has surged even among groups that recently were broadly opposed, according to a new national survey released on Monday, June 26, 2017. [Associated Press]