Today's paper | eEdition | Subscribe
The Truth-O-Meter
Latest print edition
St. Petersburg Times
Environment: Air Quality
Special report
Video report
Multimedia report
Fill out this form to email this article to a friend
Your name Your email
Recipient email
You may enter up to 20 multiple email addresses, separated by commas.
Your message
Validation Code
Hear
validation
code
  Enter validation code

Smog added to Tampa Bay area hit list

By Craig Pittman and Asjylyn Loder, Times Staff Writers
In print: Friday, March 14, 2008


TECO's Big Bend Station
TECO's Big Bend Station
[Skip O'Rourke | Times, 2005]
Social Bookmarking
Digg Facebook Stumbleupon
Reddit Del.icio.us Newsvine
ADVERTISEMENT

Hillsborough, Pinellas and Pasco counties likely will be required to take expensive steps to reduce smog and meet new air pollution standards set this week by the federal Environmental Protection Agency.

Reducing the smog that tends to plague the Tampa Bay area during warm weather probably will require gas stations to sell cleaner fuel that costs more, Hillsborough County officials said Thursday.

It also will likely require imposing tougher restrictions on the power plants and incinerators where smokestacks still spew nitrogen oxide, a key component in smog, they said.

On the bright side, the new limits will reduce the number of Tampa Bay area residents suffering from respiratory ailments, particularly children and the elderly, said Jerry Campbell of Hillsborough County's Environmental Protection Commission.

State environmental officials were noncommittal about their next step, saying only that they would review the new federal standards and decide what to do.

Hillsborough EPC director Rick Garrity predicted the most likely move would be to require "that all the gasoline coming into this area would have to be reformulated to burn cleaner."

Reformulated gas, currently used in 17 states and the District of Columbia, costs about 5 to 6 cents more per gallon than conventional gas, the EPA says.

As for the power plants and incinerators, work under way at Progress Energy will reduce the company's emissions, said spokesman Scott Sutton. The St. Petersburg utility is converting its Weedon Island power plant in Pinellas County from oil to cleaner-burning natural gas.

TECO's Apollo Beach plant will clean up its coal-fired emissions by 2011, according to Campbell of the Hillsborough EPC.

Repeatedly flunking pollution standards can carry a stiff penalty. When Atlanta flunked in 1997, federal officials froze money for new highway construction in the region. Road building stalled, producing nightmarish traffic jams, hurting economic growth and damaging property values.

Two chemicals combine to produce ozone, the main ingredient of smog, on sunny days: hydrocarbons and nitrogen oxide. Both puff out of the tail pipes of cars, trucks and motorcycles, as well as industrial smokestacks.

Studies show that more people head to hospitals with respiratory problems when ozone increases, said Dr. Thomas Truncale, a pulmonologist who teaches at the University of South Florida. He advises his patients to stay indoors on those days.

Until this week, the federal limit for average concentrations of ozone at ground level over an eight-hour period was 84 parts per billion (ppb). Hillsborough barely scraped by, thanks to Tampa Electric's switch from coal to natural gas at its Tampa plant, Campbell said.

The American Lung Association sued the federal government to force it to tighten the limit on ozone. Last year, a science advisory panel unanimously recommended setting the limit no higher than 70 ppb, and urged EPA Administrator Stephen Johnson to consider a limit as low as 60 ppb.

But electric utilities, oil companies and other businesses lobbied the agency to keep the standard at 84 ppb, arguing that tighter regulations would cost them too much.

The economic argument should not count when the scientists agree on what is best for human health, said William L. Chameides, who chaired a National Academy of Sciences panel that reviewed air quality management in the United States in 2001.

"Where do you draw the line on saving lives?" he asked, contending that setting the limit higher than the scientists' recommendation would mean "more sick days, school absences and deaths."

Johnson announced late Wednesday that the new limit would be 75 ppb. He also proposed revamping the Clean Air Act so EPA administrators could consider cost when revising pollution standards.

"We're really concerned that they're not doing more to protect public health," said Brenda Olsen, spokeswoman for the state chapter of the American Lung Association.

Hillsborough and Pasco are among 10 Florida counties that do not meet the new EPA smog standard, according to DEP figures. Manatee and Sarasota also flunk. From 2004 to 2007, Hillsborough averaged 81 ppb, while Pasco, Manatee and Sarasota's readings were all 76 ppb, according to the DEP.

While Pinellas' reading of 72 ppb meets the new smog standard, air pollution does not stop at the county line. So any pollution control measures required in the four surrounding counties will probably be required in Pinellas as well, Campbell said.

The highest ozone reading in Florida, 82 ppb, was in Escambia County in the Panhandle, according to the DEP. The other counties DEP identified as not in compliance are Santa Rosa, Bay, Duval, Lake and Orange.

The EPA gives counties years to meet the needed reductions. The areas suffering from the worst air pollution may get up to a decade to comply before federal funds would be withheld.

Information from the Associated Press, Washington Post and San Jose Mercury News was used in this report.



[Last modified: Mar 14, 2008 11:19 PM]



Comments on this article
by Scott Mar 14, 2008 11:19 PM
Think about your food you eat. All the heavy medals.Murcury,Lead. In your fish is rising. End dead planet
by Buzzard Mar 14, 2008 8:27 PM
Anyone who regularly drives to Tampa in the morning knows the smog ain't from cars. You can distinctly see the trail of yellow crud pouring out of the power station smokestacks, raining their pollution onto Tampa and St. Pete for babies to breat
by Peter Mar 14, 2008 4:47 PM
pete...The emissions tests were in only four (4) counties (Hills, Pine, Duval, Broward), the rest of the state didnt have them. Get YOUR facts straight!!
by Jocephus Mar 14, 2008 3:37 PM
I wish they would bring back emissions testing. Lately it seems like I'm always stuck behind an old car spewing smoke when driving. It's like nobody even tries to maintain their cars without mandatory testing.
by pete Mar 14, 2008 3:20 PM
Deebee, I dont know what you are talking about. I've lived in florida for 17 years and there has never been a emisssions inspection requirement for vehicles in this state. Get your facts straight
by Jim Mar 14, 2008 2:35 PM
We all drive with our windows open and breath the fresh air. That would be nice. No cigarettes, no emissions, no smog, no global warming. Never gonna happen. Sigh :-(
by Frank Mar 14, 2008 1:34 PM
Emissions controls is the best way this problem was waiting to happen when they removed testing....
by cb Mar 14, 2008 1:26 PM
So tired of the false arguments against reducing pollution because of costs! A measly 5-6 cents/gal for gasoline is meager, compared to the financial costs of all the health problems.
by beckythegreat Mar 14, 2008 1:20 PM
They should tax the heck out of cigarettes. Behind every dirtbag in a beat up car is a cigarette.
by Fed up in Pinellas Mar 14, 2008 11:08 AM
I agree with Daniel. I think there should be a mandatory emissions testing on any car over ten years for resale. This should put a stop to all the endless reselling of cars that litter and pollute the roadways of Pinellas County. You know who you are
by deebee Mar 14, 2008 11:00 AM
Daniel, we used to do that. And when the air quality readings improved, Gov. Bush said, Problem solved. And then eliminated the requirement.
by Heidi Mar 14, 2008 11:00 AM
Agreed-bringing back emissions inspection programs is a must. But making the big polluters (TECO Big Bend and other power plants) is paramount also. It also helps to boost mass-transit -- a pollution saver in many respec
by eric Mar 14, 2008 10:50 AM
How about considering all costs associated with action and inaction? Complying with stricter standards may cost the utilities some money, but keeping old standards will cause increased health problems and healthcare costs paid by taxpayers.
by Daniel Mar 14, 2008 9:31 AM
How about instead of increasing taxes on already record high gas prices, they require vehicle inspections? This would force vehicles to comply with emissions restrictions. Several other states already have inspection programs. Why not Florida?
Subscribe to the Times
Click here for daily delivery
of the St. Petersburg Times.

Email Newsletters

ADVERTISEMENT

 
ADVERTISEMENT