The surrogate
It begins with a woman who yearns for a baby and another who is willing and able to give her one. You can imagine the motives of the prospective parents. But what about the woman willing to carry a baby, give birth and then walk away?
Friday Night Rewind It doesn't matter which team you cheer for. We've got video previews of every high school football program in Hillsborough, Pinellas, Pasco and Hernando County.
Florida Power & Light, the state's largest utility, announced Wednesday it plans to build three solar energy plants in Florida, including one that would be the biggest of its kind in the world.
The three plants in South and Central Florida will cost $688-million and represent the first commercial-scale renewable energy to be installed in the state. Combined they will be capable of generating enough electricity for 35,000 homes and businesses, which — while small — marks a big step up for solar technology.
FPL Group chairman and CEO Lewis Hay III made the announcement at a two-day state Climate Change Summit in Miami hosted by Gov. Charlie Crist. "Pending regulatory approval, FPL will build 110 megawatts of solar power right here in the Sunshine State, making Florida No. 2 in the nation for solar energy," Hay said.
Hay credited a new energy bill signed Wednesday by Crist "that put a supportive policy framework in place for solar power."
The governor opened his second climate summit saying now is the time "to define our next step forward" for the "green future of the Sunshine State."
FPL's solar plants are part of a seven-year plan announced by the company last September to install 300 megawatts of solar energy in Florida. "The announcement today is a little over one-third of that in less than one year," said FPL president Armando Olivera.
"We think that is pretty good," he added, saying that sites for all three plants had been selected and permits granted. Contracts for the solar technology are due to be signed in the next few days.
Construction of the plants should begin later this year, and the plants would become operational some time in 2009, he said.
The company is awaiting final approval by the state Public Service Commission, which regulates utilities. "That's the only thing we are missing," he said.
The news was welcomed by clean energy activists who have long argued that utilities were not doing enough to invest in solar energy, the world's cleanest renewable energy source. In the past, utilities said Florida's skies were too cloudy to make solar power cost-effective as a reliable energy source, unlike the Southwest — where FPL Group already operates a big solar plant in the Mojave Desert.
Wednesday's news "needs to be applauded," said Stephen Smith, director of the Southern Alliance for Clean Energy. "By going to this kind of utility scale of production they are showing that solar does have potential in Florida, and that will drive cost down further."
FPL says it is has another five solar projects in the works in Florida. "The technology is improving almost daily," said Olivera. "It's becoming more cost-effective."
When carbon emissions begin to be penalized financially, as some governments already are doing, that would make emissions-free solar energy even more competitive, he added.
A 25-megawatt facility in De Soto County will be "the world's largest photovoltaic solar panel facility," the company says. A second 10-megawatt solar panel facility will be built at the Kennedy Space Center.
A larger 75-megawatt solar thermal facility will be built at FPL's existing Martin County plant, which runs on natural gas. By adding the new solar thermal technology, which uses intense heat from the sun to power steam turbines, the company hopes to create "the world's first hybrid energy center," allowing it to switch off its fossil-fuel gas-fired plant when there's enough sun.
Each sunrise will be the equivalent "of taking our foot off the gas pedal," Hay said.
FPL's solar plans may help offset the negative image of its much-vaunted Sunshine Energy Program, which charges customers a voluntary $9.75 monthly fee to help develop green energy.
Nearly 39,000 Florida Power & Light customers gave the company $11.4-million over four years to develop green energy, but a report this week by Florida's Public Service Commission shows most of the money went toward administrative and marketing costs.
The program "does not currently serve the interest of the program's participants," the report found.
FAST FACTS
Energy law boosts solar power
Key pro-solar provisions in the energy bill signed by Gov. Charlie Crist at Wednesday's climate change summit:
• The value of solar equipment can't be added to the value of a home for tax assessment purposes.
• Net metering, the utility industry term for the way power companies compensate consumers for solar power they privately contribute to the grid, must be standardized statewide.
• New solar panel manufacturers that create at least 400 new jobs in the state can receive a capital investment tax credit.
[Last modified: Jun 27, 2008 07:03 PM]
Comments on this article
by JohnPublic
Jun 27, 2008 7:03 PM
Solar makes everyone feel warm and fuzzy, but it is inferior compared to other "proven" technologies. Give us nuclear and coal gassification plants so we won't be held hostage to foreign oil.
by Frank
Jun 27, 2008 6:56 PM
FPL gets to install a big solar system and pass the cost off to the ratepayers. Then they own it and charge said ratepayers for the green/clean electricity. $688 mil would be better spent on distributed solar owned by the ratepayers.
by Frank
Jun 27, 2008 6:56 PM
Is SolarFun one of those Chinese manufacturers thats poisoning the environment. REC Group modules are manufactured with hydropower, under some of the strictest environmental regulations in the world.
by Frank
Jun 27, 2008 6:54 PM
I'm not convinced solar thermal will work in Florida. FPL other solar thermal plants in the Southwest depend on numerous consecutive days of cloudless weather to get the high temps. They backed away from their relationship with Ausra for some reason?
by Frank
Jun 27, 2008 9:43 AM
You think that's expensive just wait till you start paying for the nuke that won't be built for 10 years, maybe. FPL doesn't have to make a profit because they can recover their costs from consumers. Hedging for future carbon tax on the backs of us.
by Sven
Jun 27, 2008 9:40 AM
Solar thermal is really exciting! If only we could store the heat energy longer we wouldn't need a hybrid plant... the fuel would be free!
by Kevi S.
Jun 27, 2008 9:40 AM
this is huge. FPL uses SolarFun Power panels (SOLF), both FPL and SOLF stocks will rock tomorrow.
by Dave
Jun 27, 2008 9:39 AM
Why they are not promoting home based solar is because the counties charge big taxes for the lines to the homes, and the rich utilities can't charge for the power! It's always about the rich getting richer whilst the poor pays. Change the mind set.
by Frank
Jun 27, 2008 9:39 AM
I think the jury is still out on this one. It took FPL 3 years to build the PV system in Sarasota and that was only 250kW. The whole time they were collecting $10 month from those "Sunshine Energy" customers.
by Frank
Jun 27, 2008 9:39 AM
PV would be better suited on consumers rooftops: distributed generation. This way FPL still has control and can charge their customers for free sunshine. We should have a feed-in tarriff like Germany where anyone can install PV and reap the benfits.
by Marty S.
Jun 26, 2008 7:50 PM
Good start! Now let's drain Lake Okeechobee and cover it entirely w/ pv panels!
by Raymond
Jun 26, 2008 7:06 PM
OMG look at all the trees that will have to be cut down. where are the envriomentalists on that issue. boy they really don't mind hurting the invroment when its there agenda now do they. no oil but we can destroy 1000's of acres for solar
by Lesley
Jun 26, 2008 7:01 PM
FINALLY! Yes, let's focus on CLEAN & GREEN alternative fuel sources and NOT offshore drilling!!! It's time to CHANGE how we do things!
by Greg
Jun 26, 2008 6:54 PM
This is insane. Would it not make more sense to place the panels directly on the roofs of the homes that need the energy? This would eliminate the infrastructure costs of getting the energy to the users and would reduce the wasted open space.
by ctb
Jun 26, 2008 6:47 PM
Hmph! 'bout time!
What's that quote about Americans being counted on to do the right thing when they finally HAVE to?
Amusing that they're so self-congratulatory about this. Glad it's happening, tho....
by Chris
Jun 26, 2008 6:45 PM
It's about time! By doing this, even with cloudy skies, we learn a lot and offset a lot of fuel consumption. Also, the cooling demand loads will coincide with bright sunshine.
by A.H.
Jun 26, 2008 6:39 PM
"does not currently serve the interest of the program's participants"... well, duh.... We knew this. Admin and mktg costs, sheesh! It's about time they finally did something.
by Anthony
Jun 26, 2008 6:37 PM
ok, its 2008 and NOW we figure out that we should build SOLAR PANELS in Florida?? Way to be on top of it. Did they just figure out that its called "The Sunshine State"??????????
by Patti
Jun 26, 2008 6:36 PM
Good idea, however, this is $20,000. per home. Someone is getting very rich!
by R
Jun 26, 2008 6:36 PM
It would be a lot cheaper overall to put solar in neighborhoods. 5KW per house, already distributed, no new power lines, substations, or property to maintain.
In fact just give good discounts to home owners and pay them closer to retail to generate.
by Joe
Jun 26, 2008 6:36 PM
Do you think there is any connection between this project and the State's largest land purchase or (Everglades Revival of the sugar fields) last week?
by Suse
Jun 26, 2008 6:10 PM
When is TECO going to do something?
by Mike
Jun 26, 2008 5:42 PM
This is fantastic. A definite step in the right direction. And I am amazed by how fast the 3 sites will be brought on line. If all works well, it should be a benchmark for other Solar sites to be created throughout the USA. Let's roll with this.
by mark
Jun 26, 2008 5:40 PM
Only a couple decades late. Consider Germany, They might have 1/4 of FL sunshine, they are promoting Solar projects BIG TIME. It was only a matter of time before greed was preempted by technological awareness. GO SOLAR ENERGY!
by billy
Jun 26, 2008 5:34 PM
this is a good start. it's a shame that outfitting an individual house for solar can cost over 40 grand.
why are the costs so prohibitive?
by Ellie
Jun 26, 2008 5:20 PM
Money better spent! We need that energy power more than a Ball Game Stadium!
by Rich
Jun 26, 2008 5:19 PM
FLA should be the USA's solar capital before AZ grabs it.
by joe
Jun 26, 2008 5:18 PM
it's about time. It obviously makes more financial sense at this time for fp&l. Money makes the world go round.
by Jack
Jun 26, 2008 5:18 PM
Kudos FPL. Finally, alternative energy is becoming economically worthwhile. Now if only people would start consuming less....
by Patty
Jun 26, 2008 5:15 PM
It's about time. Solar energy power that is free! great alternative to air pollution. Best gift to our children and all future generations.
by Jane
Jun 26, 2008 5:04 PM
Three-quarters of a BILLION dollars to generate electricity to ONLY 35,000 homes?? What a colossal waste of money! Get ready to open your wallets, FPL customers. (But at least the EnviroNazis are happy! Sheesh).
by Russell
Jun 26, 2008 4:58 PM
Hmm - from FPL's own website:
"Though nicknamed the ?sunshine state,? Florida has too much cloud cover to make large-scale solar power production a cost effective alternative."
http://www.fpl.com/environment/conservation/alternative_energy.shtml#3
by Anne
Jun 26, 2008 4:56 PM
Finally! Was always wondering why we never capitalized on our strongest resource- sunshine!!
by John
Jun 26, 2008 4:51 PM
This is great news,however the state should do much more to help homeowners with rooftop solar units. These provide home energy when it is needed the most, on the hottest days, when ac is most used.
by John
Jun 26, 2008 4:21 PM
Applause for FP&L unlike their greedy mismanaged competitor Progress Energy they are really doing something for the environment as well as the state of Florida. Progress Energy on the other hand only wants take money from their customers and give horrible customer service in return. Jeff Lyash's 66% raise tells you that the only thing Progress cares about is more money in their pockets. Thank God for FP&L doing the right thing and looking towards the future. If only FP&L provided electricity for the entire state Florida would be in much better shape.
Subscribe to the Times
Click here for daily delivery
of the St. Petersburg Times.