Make us your home page

Today’s top headlines delivered to you daily.

(View our Privacy Policy)

Ethanol projects in Florida

Ethanol far worse for environment than gas, some say

In its bid to halt climate change, Florida has pumped $50-million into ethanol projects in the past two years.

Is it worth it?

Florida has bet millions on unproven technology. If it works, in a decade Florida will produce enough ethanol to offset less than 2 percent of its thirst for gasoline. The state's gamble on ethanol continues, even as new research indicates that ethanol could be far worse for the planet than gasoline.

Jeremy Susac, director of Florida's Energy Office, stands behind the state's investment. He believes that the latest science is flawed and that ethanol offers deep cuts in greenhouse gas emissions. Even if ethanol turns out to be a major polluter, he'd still back it.

"Even if it's a wash, even it's just as bad as gasoline, why not stimulate production in-house?" Susac asked. "How many wars do you have to have in the Middle East before you say it's a good idea to reduce our dependence on foreign oil?"

Ethanol, an alcohol-based fuel that the United States makes largely from corn, has been hailed as the saving trinity: It will reduce greenhouse gases, save the family farm and free the country from the grip of foreign oil. In December, Congress passed sweeping energy legislation that pushes the country to use 36-billion gallons of biofuels a year by 2022. Ethanol, with more than 6.5-billion gallons produced in the United States last year, stands ready to fill the breach.

Florida has trumpeted $37.5-million in renewable-energy grants since the start of the year. More than $20-million went to ethanol. By contrast, the state put $2.6-million into wind projects and $2.4-million into solar.

Susac argues that ethanol is a prudent investment, just "one arrow amongst many in a quiver to reduce greenhouse gases and achieve energy security."

• • •

Some have divided the ethanol debate into warring camps of "uncritical lovers" against "unloving critics." If Susac lands squarely in the first camp, Mark Z. Jacobson, engineering professor at Stanford University, stands firmly in the second.

"There's no reason to think that ethanol will reduce carbon emissions," Jacobson said. "There's no legitimate study in the world that shows that."

Jacobson's own research shows that using ethanol instead of gasoline could make air quality worse. When he published his article last April, the industry quickly attacked. Ethanol backers claimed his funding came from Exxon Mobil. (It came from NASA.)

Ethanol boosters launched a barrage of counterclaims and fell back on ethanol's strongest defense: that it reduces the greenhouse gas emissions that cause climate change. The industry has long championed its feedstock crops as traps for carbon dioxide. Subtract the trapped carbon from ethanol's emissions, and the fuel gains an enormous carbon advantage over gasoline.

Susac pointed to an Argonne National Laboratory study popular among ethanol lovers that claims corn ethanol would cut greenhouse gases by up to 29 percent and cellulosic ethanol by as much as 85 percent.

But that claim suffered a double blow in February. Two new studies published in the peer-reviewed journal Science concluded that ethanol from corn could double greenhouse gases over 30 years. Cellulosic ethanol, made by unlocking the sugars in switch grass, could increase greenhouse gases by 50 percent.

The authors tried to calculate the poorly understood costs of turning America's farmland into a gas station. Left alone, land stores carbon. If we turn food crops to fuel crops, we still have to eat. That means new land will have to be cleared to grow food, releasing the carbon tucked away in its trees and grasses.

That indirect carbon penalty should count against ethanol, argued Tim Searchinger, visiting scholar at Princeton University and author of one of the studies.

"If you can count the benefit of using land that way, then you have to count the cost of using land that way," Searchinger said. "The point is that land is not free, either in terms of money or of carbon."

• • •

There's an important exception to Searchinger's equation, something he calls "the free carbon lunch": waste products.

Of the $50-million Florida has devoted to ethanol production and research, at least $13-million went to projects that will use waste such as tree trimmings and citrus peels. An additional $20-million went to a University of Florida project with Florida Crystals to make ethanol from sugar bagasse.

These waste-to-ethanol projects depend on cellulosic technology, which produces ethanol by unlocking the energy potential in complex fibers of tree trimmings or orange peels.

"One group talks about it as being at least 10 years away, and there's another group that talks as if it's ready to turn the spigot today," said Lonnie Ingram, director of the Florida Center for Renewable Chemicals and Fuel at the University of Florida. "I think it's between those two."

Ingram, 60, patented the genetically engineered bacteria that made it possible to use wood and agricultural waste to create cellulosic ethanol in the 1980s. But after gas prices dropped, so did interest in his breakthrough.

Development lagged until oil prices surged again in recent years. The long delay leaves cellulosic ethanol playing catch-up. The United States started building its first cellulosic ethanol plant last year in Louisiana. When completed, it will produce about 1.5-million gallons of ethanol each year.

So far, the projects under way in Florida have yet to produce a drop.

Have patience, urged Jay Levenstein, deputy director of the Florida Department of Agricultural and Consumer Services. "The science has been done, and some of the work has been done. They just really haven't made that leap to commercial scale yet."

In the meantime, U.S. motorists consume more than 388-million gallons of gasoline every day.

Numbers like that infuriate "unloving critics" like Jacobson.

"If you're trying to solve climate problems, biofuels don't do anything for climate, and they don't do anything for air quality," Jacobson lamented. "But other renewables do, and that's what we should be investing in."

Times researchers Carolyn Edds and Shirl Kennedy contributed to this report. Asjylyn Loder can be reached at or

(813) 225-3117.

Citrus Energy LLC

Location: Clewiston

Feedstock: citrus waste

Project description: produce 4-million gallons a year from citrus waste

Amount of state grant and year awarded: $2.5-million, 2007

Alico Inc.

Location: LaBelle

Feedstock: biomass

Project description: produce electricity from ethanol

Amount of state grant and year awarded: $2.5-million, 2007

Florida International


Location: Miami

Feedstock: sugar bagasse

Project description: research how to turn sugar cane waste into ethanol

Amount of state grant and year awarded: $990,532, 2007

Gulf Coast Energy

of Walton LLC

Location: Mossy Head

Feedstock: wood waste

Project description: make ethanol from wood waste and biodiesel from feedstocks like chicken fat and soybean oil

Amount of state grant and year awarded: $7-million, 2008

United States Envirofuels LLC

Location: Venus

Feedstock: sweet sorghum, sugar cane, cane by-products

Project: produce ethanol, fertilizer and beverage-grade liquid carbon dioxide

Amount of state grant and year awarded: $7-million, 2008

Liberty Industries

Location: Hosford

Feedstock: forestry waste, crop waste, sawdust

Project description: produce 7-million gallons of ethanol and 5.4 megawatts of electricity

Amount of state grant and year awarded: $4-million, 2008

Southeast Biofuels LLC

Location: Auburndale

Feedstock: citrus waste

Project description: ferment citrus waste into ethanol at a demonstration plant

Amount of state grant and year awarded: $500,000, 2008

Applied Research Associates, collaborating with Florida Crystals

Location: Panama City

Feedstock: sugarcane bagasse

Project description: research cellulosic ethanol

Amount of state grant and year awarded: $203,130, 2008

Renergie Inc.

Location: Florida Panhandle

Feedstock: sweet sorghum

Project description: build a mechanical harvesting system and produce 5-million gallons of ethanol per year

Amount of state grant and year awarded: $1.5-million, 2008


by the numbers


Gallons of ethanol produced

in the U.S. in 2007

17 days

How long it

takes U.S. drivers to use

6.5-billion gallons of gasoline

0 Barrels of ethanol

produced in Florida in 2007


Amount of state money

Florida committed to ethanol

projects in 2007 and 2008


Estimate in gallons of

Florida's annual ethanol

production by 2017


Estimate of Florida's gasoline

consumption by 2017

Sources: Florida Department of Environmental Protection; Florida Department of Agriculture and

Consumer Services; U.S. Energy

Information Administration;

Renewable Fuels Association

Ethanol far worse for environment than gas, some say 03/01/08 [Last modified: Thursday, October 28, 2010 9:21am]
Photo reprints | Article reprints

© 2017 Tampa Bay Times


Join the discussion: Click to view comments, add yours

  1. Rays beat Orioles, but tough stretch looms that could change their plans (w/video)

    The Heater

    ST. PETERSBURG — Tuesday was a step back in the right direction for the Rays, who halted a season-high five-game losing streak by hanging on — and we mean that pretty much literally — for a 5-4 win over the Orioles.

    The Rays’ Tim Beckham celebrates with Mallex Smith after hitting a three-run homer in the second inning for a 5-0 lead.
  2. Diaz, Taddeo win easily in special Miami Senate primaries


    Two Miami state Senate candidates who raised and spent the most in their respective primaries — Republican Rep. Jose Felix Diaz and Democratic businesswoman Annette Taddeo — notched easy victories in a special election Tuesday night.

    Republican candidate Jose Felix Diaz is surrounded by supporters after he won the primary for Florida’s Senate District 40 race. Democrat Annette Taddeo, right, celebrates her victory with supporter Venus Lovely at BJ’s Restaurant in The Falls.
  3. In live debate, Kriseman and Baker ask St. Pete: Is the city better off?



    Mayoral candidates Rick Kriseman and Rick Baker made their best pitch to voters in front of a live television audience on Tuesday night. The candidates essentially asked this: Is the city better off now than it was four years ago?

    Incumbent Mayor Rick Kriseman and former Mayor Rick Baker debate in front of a live television audience during the City of St. Petersburg Mayoral Debate at the Palladium Theater in St. Petersburg on Tuesday evening. The event was sponsored by the Tampa Bay Times and Bay News 9. [DIRK SHADD   |   Times]
  4. Romano: It all comes down to sewage in this mayoral race

    Local Government

    Well, poop.

    Nothing else really matters, does it?

    Schools, economic development, public safety? Pfft. The Rays stadium, affordable housing, the pier? Ack. When it comes to the St. Petersburg mayoral election, sewage is the yin, the yang and the yuck.

    At Tuesday’s debate, incumbent Mayor Rick Kriseman said responsibility lies on him regarding the sewage crisis.
  5. Shooting sends man to hospital in St. Pete


    ST. PETERSBURG — Police were investigating a shooting that occurred around 4:40 p.m. on Tuesday and sent a man to the hospital.